First Hulk pic ...sort of
Looks like Marvel got a little jealous with all the attention DC is hogging by releasing THE DARK KNIGHT tidbits like they're white doves, because today we get our first teaser pic of the new Hulk, in next summer's THE INCREDIBLE HULK. This is not an official online release from the studio. Instead, Universal unveiled the poster at the New York City Licensing show and Wizard posted it online. As far as I can tell, the Hulk's body shape is very similar to the previous film, although this time he appears to be all black and completely featurless, which to me came as a geniuine shock. Oh no wait, that's a silhouette. Rrrright. Looks cool so far. Director Louis Leterrier is said to be creating this Hulk out of a melange of makeup, animatronics, and CGI, whereas the first Hulk was primarily the latter. As we all know, the film stars Edward Norton as Bruce Banner, along with Liv Tyler, William Hurt, and Tim Roth, as Abomination. And as you can tell from the picture, it will be released June 13 of next year.
Source: /Film
Extra Tidbit: Billy Crudup was Ang Lee's first choice to play Bruce Banner in the first HULK.




































































































4:11AM on 06/22/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I was simply saying that the film intrigues me with its casting decisions. But the poster blows.
I was simply saying that the film intrigues me with its casting decisions. But the poster blows.
3:29AM on 06/22/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I'll agree with you FeedMe..., that the emerging details continue to make this film sound exciting and interesting.
However, if this is actually intended to be something that excites fans, they have failed entir...
I'll agree with you FeedMe..., that the emerging details continue to make this film sound exciting and interesting.
However, if this is actually intended to be something that excites fans, they have failed entirely. It is quite possibly the most bland advertisement I've ever seen. Although I don't see any reason this reflects negatively on the film's potential quality, it certainly does them a disservice by having a truly crappy piece of art out there with their name on it.
I mean, for one, the shape of the hulk, while similar to the first film, is nothing to be excited about, as one of you pointed out. Second, the background is completely anonymous and might as well be white --"oh wait, theres a one way sign, thats so cool! Nevermind!!"...uhhhh, just dumb.
And finally, the title and font/logo for the hulk: This is possibly the worst facet of the poster, and most important part. It is almost precisely the old logo, and the logo used in the comics, etc.... In other words, absolutely NOTHING new or exciting--
Whereas if you look at Batman, and his logo, that has changed so many times over the years that it is nearly unrecognizable. And what's more important, its not some stagnant, dated notion of what's cool-- People want their favorites reinvented and reinterpretted, not simply refilmed with newer effects. If this isn't obvious enough, see superman returns.
I remain excited at the prospect of this film, but only for the talent involved and the details emerged. I have to agree that this poster is a complete waste, and would only hurt the films hype.
8:12PM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
This already sounds way better than the first and the casting is twice as good as I'd ever hoped. Normally it isnt necessary for a remake/sequalish thing to follow so closely, but this was needed. I dont even like the hul...
This already sounds way better than the first and the casting is twice as good as I'd ever hoped. Normally it isnt necessary for a remake/sequalish thing to follow so closely, but this was needed. I dont even like the hulk that much as a comic character.
5:46PM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:10PM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Should've known some dumbasses would already be bitching about it.
Should've known some dumbasses would already be bitching about it.
1:12PM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Id be super happy if they kept his look the same (aside from the face) being the actor is different :/
Id be super happy if they kept his look the same (aside from the face) being the actor is different :/
11:47AM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
But anyway: Go Ed Norton!
But anyway: Go Ed Norton!
11:08AM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:12AM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
"He's shaped like the first Hulk" "Someone forgot to push the originality button." For christ's sake people...he's shaped like the Hulk. Would you prefer he wear a cape and a dunce cap?
I qu...
"He's shaped like the first Hulk" "Someone forgot to push the originality button." For christ's sake people...he's shaped like the Hulk. Would you prefer he wear a cape and a dunce cap?
I quit. The internet is dumb.
9:46AM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
BLEH...
BLEH...
6:29AM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
[link]
Or this:
[link]
[link]
Or this:
[link]
5:41AM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:13AM on 06/21/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
this is just rediculous and hideous
this is just rediculous and hideous