No Tree in 09?

Comments: 12
terometer
11%
Strike Back below!
by: Niki Stephens Oct. 15, 2009

Another movie of interest was pushed back today, Terrence Malick's TREE OF LIFE.

It was originally thought that TREE would be released by Christmas but will have to wait. Bob Burney, chief of the film's distributor Apparition said this about the year end opening, “Wishful. It’s definitely not going to come out this year.”

What might be even more disappointing for the film is that the push back takes it out of contention for the 2009 Oscars. It certainly would have been nominated. The film has two amazing actors: Brad Pitt and Sean Penn. Plus a heartfelt story about the loss of a son's innocence and the struggle to come to grips with it into adulthood. This is Malick's fifth film in the span of 35 years which may have to do with him being a bit of a perfectionist. The director shot the film in 2008 in Austin, Texas and spent more than the past year in the editing room. Needless to say, he's not in much of a hurry.

TREE was also potentially going to play at Sundance but with the push back is more likely to play at Cannes in May. As for an exact date on the movies release all Burney could say was, “I can’t tell you when it will come out.” Although this is sort of a bummer, I'd rather Malick take a million years trying to perfect it than just put some shitty drama out there.

Source: Indie Wire

Extra Tidbit: George Clooney joked yesterday about adopting some of Brad Pitt's kids. I say go ahead, he's got a few to spare.

12 discussions Expand all
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
corran horn
5:23PM on 10/16/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Disappointed but not surprised
While I would have liked to see Tree of Life this fall, I'm not surprised that it's been pushed back to next year. I often thought that December 2009 was too optimistic, given how long Malick likes to take when editing his films, and in this [link] was right.
While I would have liked to see Tree of Life this fall, I'm not surprised that it's been pushed back to next year. I often thought that December 2009 was too optimistic, given how long Malick likes to take when editing his films, and in this [link] was right.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
FrancoYesca
1:17PM on 10/16/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Damn It
With the exception of Zombieland any movie worth a damn has, for some reason, got to be pushed back.
With the exception of Zombieland any movie worth a damn has, for some reason, got to be pushed back.
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
Justinvsky1
1:40AM on 10/16/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Terrence Malick is one of the best
My favorite director and one of the best of our time. DAMN I'm pissed.
My favorite director and one of the best of our time. DAMN I'm pissed.
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
Justinvsky1
1:39AM on 10/16/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Terrence Malick is one of the best
My favorite director and one of the best of our time. DAMN I'm pissed.
My favorite director and one of the best of our time. DAMN I'm pissed.
 
-1
Vote Up Vote Down
Cinematographer
1:28AM on 10/16/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Hopefully it's better than The New World...what a let down that film was. For such a "perfectionist" he sure didn't bother perfecting that one.
Hopefully it's better than The New World...what a let down that film was. For such a "perfectionist" he sure didn't bother perfecting that one.
2 Replies
 
luke319
2:01AM on 10/16/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
The New World is certainly not for everybody. I felt it was a pretty good film, but I also felt that no matter how you looked at it, it wasn't on the same level as most of Mallick's other work.
The New World is certainly not for everybody. I felt it was a pretty good film, but I also felt that no matter how you looked at it, it wasn't on the same level as most of Mallick's other work.
 
Justinvsky1
1:39AM on 10/16/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
The New World is a cinematic revelation pal. Open Your Eyes.
The New World is a cinematic revelation pal. Open Your Eyes.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
haakim the beam
10:14PM on 10/15/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
guess it's ok to wait for something most likely very good...
guess it's ok to wait for something most likely very good...
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
Natty
9:51PM on 10/15/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Damn. I was kinda expecting it though seeing as we hadn't got a trailer or anything yet.

Still can't wait to see this movie.
Damn. I was kinda expecting it though seeing as we hadn't got a trailer or anything yet.

Still can't wait to see this movie.
 
+5
Vote Up Vote Down
drewmc
8:21PM on 10/15/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
First Shutter Island, now this...booo.
First Shutter Island, now this...booo.
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
JackDurden
7:34PM on 10/15/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Darn
At least now we have another reason to hope for 2010 being a great movie year.
At least now we have another reason to hope for 2010 being a great movie year.
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
AntoineDoinel
7:33PM on 10/15/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Has it just been officially pushed back today ? Cause I thought it'd been obvious for quite a while this film wasnt coming out this year. Anyhow. I cant wait to see it. Pitt has been working with great directors lately. Coens, Fincher, Tarantino, Malick. I hope he works with Scorsese some day.
Has it just been officially pushed back today ? Cause I thought it'd been obvious for quite a while this film wasnt coming out this year. Anyhow. I cant wait to see it. Pitt has been working with great directors lately. Coens, Fincher, Tarantino, Malick. I hope he works with Scorsese some day.