INT: Sam Raimi

Comments:
 
Strike Back below!
by: Thomas Leupp Oct. 20, 2004

Every time I see Sam Raimi, I’m always amazed that he ever made it in Hollywood in the first place. Polite, humble and exceedingly gracious, he is the antithesis of the self-absorbed, shamelessly self-promoting types one so often encounters in Los Angeles. Not only did the guy make it, but he’s at the helm of one of the most successful film franchises of all time, SPIDER-MAN. Given my admiration for Sam, I was naturally psyched up for our one-on-one interview about his latest project, THE GRUDGE, which is based on a series of popular Japanese films by the same name. Only problem was I also had tickets for the Dodgers-Cardinals playoff game going on at the same time. Talk about dilemmas. I couldn’t pass up a chance to hang with Sam, though, so the Dodger game would have to wait. It was appropriate that when we sat down, the first thing Sam mentioned was baseball.

Wearing his trademark suit and tie, he also talked about SPIDER-MAN 3, the possibility of another EVIL DEAD film, and, of course, his experience producing THE GRUDGE, opening this Friday. Check it out:

SAM RAIMI

Raimi: Are you a baseball fan?

Yes.

The hardest part [of the junket] is not being able to watch the game. (I pull out my ticket) For tomorrow’s game?

Nope, the game right now. 

You’re kidding! You poor bastard. It’s starting right now, right?

Yeah. So right after this, I’m on my way.

You got a good seat?

No, we’re in the bleachers. But I don’t mind it much.

Yeah, the bleachers are fine. It’s those ones that are underneath and dead on the side – I once got ‘em. It was a nightmare; I couldn’t see crap. I was on the third base line, all the way in the corner.

What was it about the Grudge that made you want to make it with your production company?

When I saw it, I was absolutely terrified by the film. And I thought this director was probably some new master of horror, and because I was so affected by it, I thought, “Oh, everybody’s gonna wanna see this.”  So it was simple as that. I was really terrified by it and I thought it would be perfect, therefore, for our company, Ghost House Pictures.

Were you concerned at all with adapting a Japanese film for American audiences?

Yes, only in the sense that I didn’t want to spoil it. I didn’t want to make it some lame, Americanized version of something that was uniquely Japanese. So the conditions under which I made it with my company were, I said that I’m interested as long as we’re gonna make it with the same director, in Japan, with the same crew that made it, so it has the exact same feel. The only thing I wanted to change was I wanted to put American actors in it, obviously speaking English, and because I’m asking to do that, we need to re-work the story as subtly as possible so that we have justification of who these people are and why they’re in Japan.

Did you get a lot of pressure from the studio to have an American director or make certain other changes?

One of the reasons that my partner, Robert Tappert and myself made this company, Ghost House Pictures, is because the kind of horror films we like aren’t usually being made by the studios. We work in such a way so that we have our own financing, we put together the project any which way we desire, and then the studio can come on board or not. So we had already decided that’s the director, that it would be made in Japan, and what the story was. And then Columbia had the option of joining us or not. 

What type of a producer are you? Are you more of a hands-on producer? Were you on set for this?

No, only during the American portion. I’m a good and a bad producer. I’m good because I have a tremendous amount of respect for the director and I really have an awareness of great artists and technicians who work in the industry, just for having worked in the business for so long. But I’m bad in the sense that I have so much respect for a director, if I’m on the set, it’s very hard for me to say anything that may be say anything that may be counter to the director’s wishes, even if I think it’s in the best interests of the picture. I’m usually more quiet than I should be.

I read that Boogeyman was supposed to be the first film released by Ghost House. What is the status of that?

Well, Boogeyman was the first film…we didn’t really know what the first film would be that would be released. It’s certainly the first film that we took as a screenplay and began working on. So I think we assumed it would be, but because that was a film that had to be built from the ground up – from Eric Kripke’s screenplay – it was a slower process to get it to a point of production and shoot the film than it was doing a remake of an existing film. We could begin on that immediately. So it turned out that even though we were later along on the Boogeyman project, this film, the moment we saw it, already had a screenplay, already had a director, was already working. It just got jump-started and was in a position to hit the theaters at a much earlier date.

So when do you think we’ll get to see Boogeyman?

It’s whenever Screen Gem’s date is, and I actually don’t know what it is. I think it’s in February.

Was Takashi Shimizu, the director of the original Japanese film, hesitant to remake this project again?

I’ve read that he was. I know I sent out this communication, saying, “Please ask the director if he would re-make it again with an American cast,” and the answer came back that he wasn’t interested. And then I said to tell him that we don’t want to Americanize it; we really want his vision, his crew, his take on it, but with an American cast; tell him how much I loved the movie and what a big fan I was and how much I would support his vision of the film.  And then I got the answer back that yes, he would do it. He came out to visit and we talked. And we hit it off and he took the job.

Were you concerned at all about the language barrier?

Yes, I really was. I thought…I was very concerned that, with English being Shimizu-san’s second language, that he might miss some of the subtleties within the actor’s readings, within their performances.  I thought that he might not understand that the actor is taking this a slightly different way; he might not be aware of that. It’s a subtlety that maybe only and American here could understand. But when I got the dailies back, the first few days, which I was really studying closely, I couldn’t tell that it wasn’t directed by a really great American actor’s director. So, he’s got something that he can look beyond the language, into their eyes, into the performance and know whether it’s real, whether it’s right on with what he’s after or not. I don’t know quite how he does it, but he does it.

Ghost House specializes in horror/thriller films. What is it about the horror genre that appeals to you so much?

I love horror films, and I think I like them because I’m curious as to what lies beyond. Is there another world, is there something lurking in the shadows? It’s a giddy kind of fear that’s both terrifying and fun to peak into. It’s kind of like a dare. That’s really why I have a fascination with them; I love getting scared while knowing I’m really safe.

There were rumors of a possible Freddy Vs. Jason Vs. Ash film. Any truth to them?

Well, I know that New Line had planned to do that movie, but it just didn’t work out, finally. So I don’t think that’s happening anymore.

Any chance of an Evil Dead 4?

Maybe one day, but it’s hard to think about until I can finish this Spider-Man project, because it’s so all-consuming. It takes every second of my time to work on the characters, the story, and the arcs of where Peter Parker is going to go next. And then the effects are there and this team of…I mean thousands of artists and technicians that need direction. So I can’t even think about it right now. I’d like to one day, though.

And where are you with Spider-Man 3?

I’m lost in a world of confusion right now. In a place of terror.

So you’re still trying to figure out the story?

Yes, with a release date coming.

Do you have villains in mind?

Not yet. I’m still trying to figure out Peter’s journey, what he’s gotta learn in this next adventure, what’s gonna happen with the love story with him and Mary Jane Watson and his friend Harry, and what the thematic elements are. What will the movie be about? And once I know that, once I know where he’s heading, those conflicts that come up to stand in his way. Once they’re clear in my mind, then I’ll try and find those villains in the Marvel Universe that best represent that conflict, and I think that’s how I’ll arrive at the villains.

Do you think they’ll go beyond three?

Well, Amy Pascal, the chairwoman of Columbia Pictures, has said to me, “Sam, I have a sense that the audience want the conclusion of the story now.  So don’t set up anything in your story for part four.  Don’t worry about that.  Just make it as complete of a movie that ends our saga in as fulfilling a way as possible.”  So, that’s the dictate that I’m creating this story under.

Source: JoBlo.com