Aardman returns! | Movie News

Aardman returns!
Comments: 3
terometer
100%
Strike Back below!
by: Mike Sampson Apr. 2, 2007

You knew it wouldn't be long after DreamWorks officially terminated their deal with animation house Aardman that they'd wind up somewhere else. Sure enough, Sony Pictures today announces a three-year, first-look deal with Aardman. While Sony has been working on animation in-house (OPEN SEASON, SURF'S UP) but may be looking to ramp up to two animation releases a year. The first project under the deal hasn't been announced but Aardman is currently developing four projects, including a new WALLACE AND GROMIT movie that would be directed by co-founder Nick Park. Unlike the deal with DreamWorks, which at times required them to use animation staff in Los Angeles, Aardman looks forward to creating all their films from their headquarters in Bristol. Aardman is hoping that this new deal will allow them to refocus on what made Aardman so popular instead of trying to fit their styles into DreamWorks idea of a popular film. I know I've said this before but why not bring back the abandoned TORTOISE AND THE HARE project? I always thought it had potential despite its obvious production problems. Stay tuned...

Source: Variety

Add to MFC Profile

Extra Tidbit: Aardman's last film at DreamWorks, CROOD AWAKENING, is staying at DreamWorks and will be retooled by Chris Sanders (LILO & STITCH).

3 discussions Expand all
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
filmguy450
5:35PM on 04/02/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Good, good, good
As long as Aardman doesn't have to conform to fit retarded ass pop culture references (which is what destroyed Flushed Away), I'm certain they can bring back their wonderful brand of magic.
As long as Aardman doesn't have to conform to fit retarded ass pop culture references (which is what destroyed Flushed Away), I'm certain they can bring back their wonderful brand of magic.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
mountaineer014
12:46PM on 04/02/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Good news
I love them too.

Was flushed away CGI because of Dreamworks forcing them to make it CGI? Or was it Ardman trying it out to see if it could still have that Ardman touch but be made quicker than claymation?
I love them too.

Was flushed away CGI because of Dreamworks forcing them to make it CGI? Or was it Ardman trying it out to see if it could still have that Ardman touch but be made quicker than claymation?
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
Agent86
8:54AM on 04/02/2007 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Great news! Aardman rocks. For some reason I was thinking that Disney would be the ones taking a chance on Aardman, but I am glad to see that they're ending up somewhere that they can just do what they do best.
Great news! Aardman rocks. For some reason I was thinking that Disney would be the ones taking a chance on Aardman, but I am glad to see that they're ending up somewhere that they can just do what they do best.