Latest Entertainment News Headlines

Aaron Sorkin really wants to convince you The Social Network isn't sexist

10.12.2010

THE SOCIAL NETWORK is universally beloved by most and on the way to making a splash during Oscar season. But with any popular work comes controversy, and the latest screenwriter Aaron Sorkin thought it was best to directly respond to.

On TV writer Ken Levine's blog, Sorkin encounter one commenter who had a lot to say about how the film portrayed women, which, according to her, was not very flattering. “I also loved The Social Network, except for one thing– the lack of a decent portrayal of women. With the exception of 1 or 2 of them (Rashida Jones included), they were basically sex objects/stupid groupies. … kinda makes me think that Aaron Sorkin (though I love his writing) failed the women in this script.”

Sorkin apparently feels deeply for the commenter's hurt feelings, and felt the need to write an entire essay to combat these allegations. Read it below, or for the TLDR version: "This is how things were, these guys were misogynists."

Believe me, I get it. It’s not hard to understand how bright women could be appalled by what they saw in the movie but you have to understand that that was the very specific world I was writing about. Women are both prizes an equal [sic - "prizes and equals", I think]. Mark’s blogging that we hear in voiceover as he drinks, hacks, creates Facemash and dreams of the kind of party he’s sure he’s missing, came directly from Mark’s blog.

With the exception of doing some cuts and tightening (and I can promise you that nothing that I cut would have changed your perception of the people or the trajectory of the story by even an inch) I used Mark’s blog verbatim. Mark said, “Erica Albright’s a bitch” (Erica isn’t her real name–I changed three names in the movie when there was no need to embarrass anyone further), “Do you think that’s because all B.U. girls are bitches?” Facebook was born during a night of incredible misogyny. The idea of comparing women to farm animals, and then to each other, based on their looks and then publicly ranking them. It was a revenge stunt, aimed first at the woman who’d most recently broke his heart (who should get some kind of medal for not breaking his head) and then at the entire female population of Harvard.

More generally, I was writing about a very angry and deeply misogynistic group of people. These aren’t the cuddly nerds we made movies about in the 80’s. They’re very angry that the cheerleader still wants to go out with the quarterback instead of the men (boys) who are running the universe right now. The women they surround themselves with aren’t women who challenge them (and frankly, no woman who could challenge them would be interested in being anywhere near them.) And this very disturbing attitude toward women isn’t just confined to the guys who can’t get dates.

I didn’t invent the “F–k Truck”, it’s real–and the men (boys) at the final clubs think it’s what they deserve for being who they are. (It’s only fair to note that the women–bussed in from other schools for the “hot” parties, wait on line to get on that bus without anyone pointing guns at their heads.)

These women–whether it’s the girls who are happy to take their clothes off and dance for the boys or Eduardo’s psycho-girlfriend are real. I mean REALLY real. (In the case of Christy, Eduardo’s girlfriend so beautifully played by Brenda Song, I conflated two characters–again I hope you’ll trust me that doing that did nothing to alter our take on the events. Christy was the second of three characters whose name I changed.)

I invented two characters–one was Rashida Jones’s “Marylin”, the youngest lawyer on the team and a far cry from the other women we see in the movie. She’s plainly serious, competent and, when asked, has no problem speaking the truth as she sees it to Mark. The other was Gretchen, Eduardo’s lawyer (in reality there was a large team of litigators who all took turns deposing witnesses but I wanted us to become familiar with just one person–a woman, who, again, is nobody’s trophy).

And Rooney Mara’s Erica’s a class act.

I wish I could go door to door and make this explanation/apology to any woman offended by the things you’ve pointed out but obviously that’s unrealistic so I thought the least I could do was speak directly to you.

I see where he's coming from. I mean, hot girls lining up to get into exclusive parties is something I witnessed dozens of times in my (non-Ivy league) college, and I'm sure it happened to some extent and Harvard. As for Facemash, it's not hard to believe that a college guy thought it was a good idea to have a website where you could rate girls on their hotness. That's not Sorkin being sexist, Facemash was a real site invented by Zuckerberg, so that speaks to the character, whose blogs about his (ex) girlfriend being a bitch were verbatim from the blog entries he wrote in real life.

Maybe as a guy, I'm biased, but I honestly don't see the case for the movie itself being sexist. Sure, there are characters that are misogynistic, and girls who allow themselves to be taken advantage of in that fashion, but I don't think the film is straying all THAT far outside of reality, and has plenty of strong females in the film as well (Erica and Rashida Jones' Marylin). I don't think Sorkin needed to play this much defense, but hey, he is a writer, it can be hard to stop once you get going.

CLICK IMAGE TO OPEN GALLERY & SEE MORE PICS...

Extra Tidbit: I think Sorkin's bigger problem is dismissing ALL these guys as misogynists when he didn't really even talk to most of them.
Source: Ken Levine

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

12:51PM on 10/12/2010

Note to Aaron...

When you win your Oscar next year Aaron, tell all the haters to f#ck off during your speech.
When you win your Oscar next year Aaron, tell all the haters to f#ck off during your speech.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
2:03PM on 10/12/2010
People are too anal about little things in movies these days.
People are too anal about little things in movies these days.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
5:06PM on 10/12/2010

What she fails to see...

Is that there was a just as big if not bigger ratio of flawed male characters in the script. No character in the film was perfect.
Is that there was a just as big if not bigger ratio of flawed male characters in the script. No character in the film was perfect.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+6
2:54PM on 10/12/2010

The even BIGGER question:

Why wasn't there more walking and talking? ;D
Why wasn't there more walking and talking? ;D
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:44PM on 10/12/2010
I feel like you see this a lot: audiences taking the flaws of the characters and juxtaposing them to their creator/writer.
I feel like you see this a lot: audiences taking the flaws of the characters and juxtaposing them to their creator/writer.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+5
4:59PM on 10/12/2010

"Sorkin failed the women in this script.

Lady that made that comment: No he didn't fail. You might not like to admit it, but a lot of women are like that. And they are not all stupid either, some of them might even act like the smart and prudent girls in the film once the party is over. Or would if they had the looks.
Lady that made that comment: No he didn't fail. You might not like to admit it, but a lot of women are like that. And they are not all stupid either, some of them might even act like the smart and prudent girls in the film once the party is over. Or would if they had the looks.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:13PM on 10/12/2010
go to any ivy league liberal arts college and tell me there aren't an enormous amount of privileged misogynists running around. I do agree Sorkin bites his tongue condoning all of these guys, but it's not a far fetched notion.
go to any ivy league liberal arts college and tell me there aren't an enormous amount of privileged misogynists running around. I do agree Sorkin bites his tongue condoning all of these guys, but it's not a far fetched notion.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
11:33PM on 10/12/2010
Sorkin isn't dismissing anybody - he wrote a script about characters who happen to be named Mark Zuckerberg and Eduardo Saverin, and who happened to invent a website that happens to be called Facebook. Never once in the entire process did Sorkin, FIncher or anybody actually claim to set out to create a "bio-pic of the real Mark Zuckerberg." it's a fiction film, inspired by true events. And the claims of sexism are ridiculous in my opinion. And Sorkin's right - who is portrayed in a misogynistic
Sorkin isn't dismissing anybody - he wrote a script about characters who happen to be named Mark Zuckerberg and Eduardo Saverin, and who happened to invent a website that happens to be called Facebook. Never once in the entire process did Sorkin, FIncher or anybody actually claim to set out to create a "bio-pic of the real Mark Zuckerberg." it's a fiction film, inspired by true events. And the claims of sexism are ridiculous in my opinion. And Sorkin's right - who is portrayed in a misogynistic way? The frat girls? Saverin's girlfriend? Because like Sorkin, I actually think Erica is a class act and a hero for calling out Zuckerberg and not giving him the time of day. And the lawyer characters, especially Rashida Jones, are also very well-written and rounded. So what gives?!
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
3:56PM on 10/13/2010
Listen to what Daniel Tosh has to say about bitches running wild.
[link]


Listen to what Daniel Tosh has to say about bitches running wild.
[link]


Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
8:32PM on 10/12/2010
I read an article that Natalie Portman provided some advice to Sorkin about the movie, since she was at Harvard during the time facebook came out (remember the line "Zuckerberg was the biggest thing on campus, and that included 2 olympians and a movie star). Since she was at Harvard, I'm sure some of the accounts of what she saw women act like in Harvard are accurate, and you can hardly blame Sorkin. Man, how awesome would it be to have Natalie Portman in your class.
I read an article that Natalie Portman provided some advice to Sorkin about the movie, since she was at Harvard during the time facebook came out (remember the line "Zuckerberg was the biggest thing on campus, and that included 2 olympians and a movie star). Since she was at Harvard, I'm sure some of the accounts of what she saw women act like in Harvard are accurate, and you can hardly blame Sorkin. Man, how awesome would it be to have Natalie Portman in your class.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+0
12:58PM on 10/12/2010

I Agree Paul, The Bigger Problem:

"I was writing about a very angry and deeply misogynistic group of people." Wait... What was that Aaron?
"I was writing about a very angry and deeply misogynistic group of people." Wait... What was that Aaron?
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
9:21AM on 10/13/2010
GOD. Bitches keep on complain'in. Nice retort fella!
GOD. Bitches keep on complain'in. Nice retort fella!
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting

Movie Hottie Of The Week

More