Aronofsky explains his departure from RoboCop | Movie News

Aronofsky explains his departure from RoboCop
Comments: 10
terometer
40%
Strike Back below!
by: Mike Sampson Sep. 2, 2010

Much has been made on the interwebz about Darren Aronofsky's participation on ROBOCOP. Rumors that Aronofsky was departing the project were rampant within months of him signing on to the project and eventually he did leave the film behind to work on BLACK SWAN. While there was much speculation on the move, the director himself had never commented on his participation on ROBOCOP. Until now...

So why did Aronofsky bail on ROBOCOP? Was it the 3D? Did he realize it was a bad idea to remake ROBOCOP? Did Clarence Boddicker come charging in the room and say, "Bitches leave"? None of the above actually. Aronofsky told MTV that it had nothing to do with 3D or his interest in the project, simply that MGM was in a precarious financial situation (which we've all seen) and BLACK SWAN was ready to go immediately. That made his decision pretty easy.

Despite the rumors, Aronofsky claims that "interesting things are going to be done in 3D" and that if it's good enough for Scorsese and Cameron, it's good enough for him. "With the right project, I'm totally into 3D."

As to whether he'd ever return to ROBOCOP if MGM got their finances in order, Aronofsky remained diplomatic saying, "We'll see what happens with it down the line." (I don't think you need Google Translate to know that means, "Thanks but no thanks...")

Source: MTV

Add to MFC Profile

Extra Tidbit: WOLVERINE 2...in 3D?

10 discussions Expand all
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
filmaddict
5:27PM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I was looking forward to his vision for this
I love the old movie so much, but there was so much potential for a solid franchise, and the sequels were sequentially more and more awful, almost undermining the original in the process. I think a "reboot" could do it justice. I still say Mickey Rourke as RoboCop -- dude won't even need much prosthetic makeup.



Verhoeven is obviously a more satirical and over-the-top director,...
I love the old movie so much, but there was so much potential for a solid franchise, and the sequels were sequentially more and more awful, almost undermining the original in the process. I think a "reboot" could do it justice. I still say Mickey Rourke as RoboCop -- dude won't even need much prosthetic makeup.



Verhoeven is obviously a more satirical and over-the-top director, but Aronofsky could definitely reinterpret the story in a darker, grittier and more emotionally resonant fashion. It would at the very least be an interesting reboot and one of the few justified ones (really, does Fantastic 4 need to be redone already?).
 
-1
Vote Up Vote Down
The_Soloist
12:58PM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
meh. don't really care if this gets remade.
meh. don't really care if this gets remade.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
mister easter
12:52PM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
didn't i read somewhere that aronofsky wanted to do a live action "lone wolf and cub?" i think he should stick to that! i'd love to see his take on a sexy samurai flick!
didn't i read somewhere that aronofsky wanted to do a live action "lone wolf and cub?" i think he should stick to that! i'd love to see his take on a sexy samurai flick!
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
Sulaco
12:52PM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Don't touch it.
Leave the old one where rests upon it's alter of awesome.
Leave the old one where rests upon it's alter of awesome.
 
-12
Vote Up Vote Down
Terminal_83
12:30PM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Robocop will not translate well with general audiences unless they tone down the violence, the sexual content and re-invent Robocop with a sleeker more Transformer like design.
Robocop will not translate well with general audiences unless they tone down the violence, the sexual content and re-invent Robocop with a sleeker more Transformer like design.
2 Replies
 
mayhem23
5:04PM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
They already did that, it's called Iron Man.
They already did that, it's called Iron Man.
 
slimbo0330
12:35PM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
they already toned down the violence and sexual content (if there ever was any) and they called it Robocop 3. you saw how that worked out.
they already toned down the violence and sexual content (if there ever was any) and they called it Robocop 3. you saw how that worked out.
 
-5
Vote Up Vote Down
miguel_montes
11:41AM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Although I do agree Robocop is an excellent movie, I do feel some technical aspects of it didn't stand the test of time so well. Kinda like Clash Of The Titans. Mind you, I'm not talking about the overall quality of the movie, I'm talking about visual effects.
Although I do agree Robocop is an excellent movie, I do feel some technical aspects of it didn't stand the test of time so well. Kinda like Clash Of The Titans. Mind you, I'm not talking about the overall quality of the movie, I'm talking about visual effects.
1 Reply
 
emjoi
7:52PM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
If you are talking about the stop motion animation of the ED-209... that's classic stuff. The whole "ED tries to walk down stairs" scene is a classic moment.
If you are talking about the stop motion animation of the ED-209... that's classic stuff. The whole "ED tries to walk down stairs" scene is a classic moment.
 
+3
Vote Up Vote Down
Bigger Boat
10:32AM on 09/02/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Robocop is a perfect film. I'm glad he's not doing it, even though I think it would be great. I want to see him tackle a totally original sci-fi action flick. Or remake a lesser film w/ lots of potential.
Robocop is a perfect film. I'm glad he's not doing it, even though I think it would be great. I want to see him tackle a totally original sci-fi action flick. Or remake a lesser film w/ lots of potential.