C'MON HOLLYWOOD: Stop giving away too much in trailers!
...stop giving away too much in trailers!
by J.A. Hamilton
Now I get the whole advertising end of things and will admit that proper advertising can be key, but once a film hits and people see that itís good, word of mouth is just as powerful. That said, what the hell happened to the good old days when we got a teaser and then a trailer!? These days we get both of those (sometimes two teasers), an international trailer, a red band trailer, a half dozen TV spots, making of featurettes and then another half a dozen ďclipsĒ that hit the net all before opening day. In some cases you almost donít even need to see the movie after all this because you already have seen most of what it has to offer as well as any or all the highlights.
I would have rather been surprised.
Sure, this alone isnít enough to dismiss the movie going process but what about giving away big secrets? Take TERMINATOR SALVATION for example, I was unimpressed by the way they gave away Arnieís cameo in a TV spot. Yeah, we all knew it was coming, but did they have to show it? This next oneís a bit personal as I was pumped to see the remake of RED DRAGON (MANHUNTER was the first go around if you didnít know), and having read the books I was blown away by how they reveal a key plot point in the trailer (Lecter gives the killer Will Grahamís home address, a secret code the FBI was trying to break). That was a big deal in the book, one you didnít see coming and should have remained a secret and not a selling point.
I was disappointed in the trailer, but the movie kicked ass.
The worst examples of blatant giveaways come from the straight to DVD trailers. Sweet Jesus, you all know what Iím saying and are no doubt shaking your heads if youíve ever been standing in Blockbuster (or whatever local movie store) and found yourself watching the trailers they have streaming all day long. I canít count how many times Iíve started watching one of these trailers and had my interest turn to anger by the end of it (Iím still rather unimpressed with the CARRIERS trailer giveaways, though I wonít repeat them in case you havenít watched this awesome film). I still watch the movies, but am deeply angered when the plot or storyís tension is ruined by a dead giveaway I saw in the trailer.
I highly recomment this flick, just don't watch the trailer.
Trailers will always be one of my favourite things about movies, and in cases like X-MEN: THE LAST STAND and SPIDERMAN 3, the trailers even outshined the films, which isnít exactly a good thing but it proves that a phenomenal trailer can sell us instantly on even a mediocre flick. But too much of a good thing is still a rule of thumb, and though I hate to sound too much like a clichť, less is more when it comes to trailers. Curiosity is also to blame, as most times we feel compelled to watch any and all clips available to us, but most of us complain that weíre no longer surprised at the movies and though not a cure for this situation, seeing less of the final product in trailers and advertisements is a good start.
I dug the poster, hated the trailer.
|Extra Tidbit:||I'd hoped I was wrong, but as it turns out I'd managed to guess who the killer was in SURVEILLANCE after watching the trailer...despite the fact he wearing a mask.|