Latest Entertainment News Headlines

David Twohy talks!

10.10.2002

by Tom Leupp

Last Saturday, I skipped my usual ritual of sleeping until noon and instead headed down to the posh, uber-hip W Hotel in Westwood, California. A favorite of celebrity set, the W features a swanky lounge – the kind of place I might hang out at if I earned a living wage. But since it was 11:00 am and I wasn’t set to start drinking for at least another hour, I decided to ditch the lounge and check out the junket for BELOW, set to open in theaters on October 11th.

Combining elements of multiple genres, BELOW presents a terrifying look at a World War II submarine crew pushed to the brink of insanity by a series of escalating crises. It’s a great film, but unless you’re a regular visitor to Joblo.com or Ain’t It Cool News, chances are you’ve never even heard of it. It seems as if Dimension, the studio that produced BELOW, doesn’t believe in the internet as part of its marketing strategy. Go figure.

BELOW sprang from the mind of Darren Aronofsky (the guy behind PI and REQUIEM FOR A DREAM) and is directed by David Twohy, best known for his most recent film, the wildly successful PITCH BLACK. Once in danger of going straight to video, PITCH BLACK is now considered a sci-fi/horror classic and is widely credited with launching the career of a little guy named Vin Diesel.

Clad in a t-shirt and cargo pants and munching on handfuls of cashews, David was vibrant, engaging and remarkably candid about his experience with BELOW. He also offered some cool info on the upcoming sequel to PITCH BLACK, THE CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK. Check out the interview…

DAVID TWOHY

I noticed that the filmmakers took matters into their own hands and created a website for BELOW. How important do you think the internet is to a film’s marketing strategy?

Well look, it launched my last picture, PITCH BLACK, which was 3 weeks away from opening and possibly going straight to video, when somebody arranged for a screening with Harry Knowles, who loved it and raved about it. It was only then that the studio started to get behind it and started to promote it and decided to buy some TV spots. They jumped into it late in the day but at least they jumped into it and saved that film from oblivion.

Why do you think the Dimension took so long to get behind “Below?”

I think it’s because of K-19. I would’ve liked for it to have come out before K-19, but for whatever reason it didn’t happen. And as soon as that came out and didn’t perform as well as people thought it would then I think Dimension lost enthusiasm for its own submarine film.

How did you get involved with the project? Did you have a relationship with Darren Aronofsky before this project?

Not at all. I had seen PI and liked it a lot for its visual audacity. He liked PITCH BLACK - he told me he went to see it twice in the theaters. He did the first couple drafts of the script with his writing partner, Lucas Sussman. Darren was, I think, getting ready to do REQUIEM and the studio wanted to move ahead anyway on the project anyway. The Weinsteins had seen PITCH BLACK and liked it, so they invited me aboard and I took over the writing chores myself. Darren gave me his thoughts on the drafts as they came in and also gave me his thoughts on the cuts of the movie as they came in.

In terms of submarine movies, the benchmark that most people look to is DAS BOOT. Your film has a very different look to it. What was your inspiration for the look of the film?

Well, I didn’t want to do anything that had come before. So you’ve got to say that DAS BOOT is the benchmark and recognize that its style is very much cinema verite. Now look at U-571 and it’s got a kind of slick, studio look to it. I didn’t see K-19 so I don’t know what that looks like. The idea is to, stylistically and otherwise, come up with something that is different. So, I’m a big fan of the noir films of the 40s, like CAT PEOPLE, OUT OF THE PAST, I WALK WITH A ZOMBIE and NIGHT OF THE DEMON and I loved the cinematography and the way they establish the mood and atmosphere of the film. And I thought since I have a story set in the 1940s anyway and since I have a very dark toned movie, that the noir cinematography was the perfect style for this film and it would help make it look different than all those other submarine movies. So it is very much “submarine noir.”

Can you describe at all the process of working with your cinematographer, Ian Wilson?

Ian is a great old English gent. He’s very much a student of photography as well as cinematography. He was shooting these great portraits back in the 1940s himself. And he was a guy that I could learn a lot from about photography as well as cinematography. He’s probably best known for THE CRYING GAME. He just really knew how to give me those rich blacks, which is really important for a noir film, rich blacks. He knew about shadowplay as well. How to throw the right shadows against the walls. It was important for me to find someone who’d lived through the noir period as well. Ian was that. He’s probably about seventy years old today. Still very active. He had a lot of experience that I could tap into with this picture.

PITCH BLACK and BELOW share similar themes but very different landscapes. What was it like going from the vast, empty space of PITCH BLACK, to the very confined environment of a submarine?

Well, it wasn’t dissimilar, because in PITCH BLACK, even though we are doing wide open spaces, it’s still claustrophobic because you couldn’t venture out of the light. We just implied wide open spaces while we traveled in very small spaces. So, kind of the pieces are sort of kissing cousins in a way because of that claustrophobic aspect. There’s another similarity in that the same reversal of expectation in PITCH BLACK is used again in BELOW, because in the first third of PITCH BLACK, you’re thinking that clearly the Vin Diesel character is the root of all their problems when in fact now there’s something else on that planet that is. And we play kind of a similar game in BELOW, about who the protagonist in the movie really is.

You seem to rely a lot less on special effects in BELOW. How many visual effects shots are there in the film?

I think it’s actually a comparable number to PITCH BLACK. But more of these tend to be photo-real and invisible. In PITCH BLACK they’re sort of in your face, with creature effects, spaceships burrowing in, all of that stuff. Here, the same number of effects but used to a different effect. Every time you see the submarine underwater, that’s a visual effects shot. There are a lot of visual effects shots in BELOW, but they’re in the service of the story, whereas in PITCH BLACK they’re kind of in service of “Wow, look at that dope shit.”

You worked with an ensemble cast both in PITCH BLACK and BELOW. What are the challenges of working with an ensemble?

Well, the challenges of an ensemble cast are trying to give everyone equal time and equal attention. Because if you’re doing a movie with a movie star, one big movie star at the core, then you know that’s where that’s where most of your time is gonna go. Sorry, but it’s the truth. Not so in an ensemble cast. Just about the time you think - and I’m talking just in general about ensemble casts - just about the time you think that you’ve got all the fires under control and everybody’s happy, there’s a brushfire that breaks out on the back forty and you realize that no, not everybody’s happy, and you’ve got to run over there and put that fire out. So it’s a lot more like that, a lot more “spot fires.” That you put out when you’re dealing with an ensemble cast.

There are a lot of talented actors in the cast, but no “stars.” Is that something you deliberately set out to do?

Yeah, I did. The beauty of the ensemble cast is that you can mess around with the audience’s expectations. And everything doesn’t have to be anchored by the big star. Everything doesn’t have to be about the big star. Capital B, capital S. And that’s cool because you can, sometimes, tell more interesting stories because of that. It hurts you when you come to market the film, that you don’t have a big star to anchor it. But it allows you more flexibility and more freedom in terms of telling an interesting story.

You went to great efforts to create a realistic experience for the cast in terms of the setting, sound effects, etc.

Yeah. It’s interesting to see actors get more comfortable in their environment. At first I was always telling them what to do in terms of their jobs and their capacity, but in the second half (of shooting) that started to reverse itself and they were telling me that “No, no, the helmsman would never do that. This is where I would go in an emergency.” It was fun and gratifying to see them take on the responsibilities of the actual positions aboard the boat. And I was learning a few things from them later on in the day because some of those actors had really done their research. Concurrent with that happening, it began to feel more and more like a submarine that you were trapped aboard. I didn’t want to give them too many exits on the submarine and I pulled the side walls of the submarine very seldom, only when I had to get a big, wide side shot. Other than that I just kept it locked up and everyone locked inside.

How far along are you with the RIDDICK CHRONICLES?

We’re in pre-production. The script is finished and I’ve got my production designer on it. Right now we’re calling the series the CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK. We’re referring to them now as “C-1,” “C-2” and “C-3.” I’m plotting all three films as we pre-produce this first film. The reason why it’s “Chronicles” and not “Pitch Black 2” is because that would give a false impression of this next film, because not only are we changing genres – the first one was a horror film and this one will be action/adventure/sci-fi – but we’re also increasing the scope in such a way that isn’t true to the original film as well.

Are you planning to shoot “C-2” and “C-3” simultaneously?

If the first one justifies any follow-ups at all, then yeah, we’re thinking of doing 2 and 3 together.

Can you give us a peek at what THE CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK will be about?

All I can say is that it takes that Riddick character and follows him through multiple worlds as he meets multiple adversaries. There’s a lot of theology in it. Even though I’m not a religious guy, I am very interested in religion and why people turn to it. In BELOW I’m interested in why people turn to supernatural explanations when there are more plausible ones. I’m not a great believer in the supernatural either, but I find it fascinating when people turn to it.

You shot PITCH BLACK in Australia. Are you planning to shoot CHRONICLES there, too?

No. We would have gone back, but stage space was a little tight there. So we booked Vancouver and sucked up all of their available stage space, only to find out that Darren’s new film, THE FOUNTAIN, went down. He had a lot of stage space in Australia reserved and suddenly in the last two weeks all of that stage space has become available again. I would have loved to go to Australia, but now we’re booked into Vancouver, so I don’t think there’s any chance of switching back at this point.

Have you done any casting yet, other than Vin Diesel?

No.

What is the casting process like for such a big studio film?

A lot of people have a say in casting matters, when you’re spending as much money as we are on RIDDICK. So, the studio will their favorite people, the casting director will have her favorite people. The producers – and there are at least three producers I know of – have their favorite people. And they’re all represented by different agencies. There are a lot of different interests being represented in the whole casting process, and ultimately you just have to remind yourself and remind the studio that you’re not gonna cast anybody that you don’t want, because sometimes there’s a lot of pressure to cast a given person. But if they’re not right for the role, you just say, “Look, I’m the one whose responsibility it is to make a good film, and I can’t make a good film without the right actor in the role. So don’t force this guy down my throat.” So you gotta give them a brushback pitch every once in a while.

Do you have any other projects in mind?

CHRONICLES is going to take me about two years, so I try not to think beyond that. But, I’ll tell you, someday I’d really like to fall back and do a drama without one goddamned visual effects shot in it.

Do you get frustrated working with visual effects?

No, I love it. But it’s so hugely time-consuming. These visual effects films are like doing two films - two normal films, in terms of the time commitment. “Pitch Black “probably had 225 visual effects shots in it. This film, BELOW, has around 200. THE CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK will have between 750 and 800 visual effects shots. So, it means a protracted post-production period just to accommodate all that stuff. It’ll take six to eight months in post-production just to accommodate all of the special effects. That’s a huge amount of time.

I’ll tell you, the tech aspect of directing is very seductive. As Orson Welles said, it is a very big train set that I get to play with. And every boy loves a train set. But there’s a problem in that you spend too much time on the technical aspect and not enough on the human aspect. And I have fallen prey to that in the past. That said, with BELOW especially, I’m getting back toward spending more time with actors, listening to their ideas and embracing some of them as well. The technical side is very compelling, but there’s so much of it in post-production that I can really feed my technical soul with that.

How difficult is it to preside over the chaos that occurs in the big action sequences?

As long as you have a bullhorn and a loudspeaker, you can do it. But it’s actually great fun. It requires a lot of inertia just to get the machine going and moving. But once it’s going, it’s really fun. I like big mechanics. If you haven’t done it before, you’re kind of scared of it. But once you’ve done it, big mechanics are great to play with. It’s just like a big fuckin’ train set.

-------------------------

I also got a chance to talk with Bruce Greenwood, who plays the tough but tormented Lieutenant Brice. Last seen in role of John F. Kennedy in THIRTEEN DAYS, Greenwood is no stranger to playing leaders thrust into difficult situations. Speaking of difficult situations, Greenwood can also be seen playing Madonna’s husband in the upcoming film SWEPT AWAY.

BRUCE GREENWOOD

Describe your experience on the set. Was it a practical set?

It was massively practical. And horrendously heavy. It was around 120 feet long, built in 25 foot sections. And they could link sections together so you could run through them with a steadycam or whatever. I was built on a big gimbal that would tilt and shake and shudder - just monstrous hydraulics beneath it.

Was it claustrophobic?

Yeah, basically you’d get there early in the morning and they’d batten down the hatches. David really wanted us to have that feeling that you surrounded by pressure. It was tight.

Did they send you to training?

Yeah, we did some training. But mostly it consisted of going to a couple of lectures where a guy who’d spent a lot of time in a submarine told us what it was like during the 50s and 60s on a submarine. It’s really close, tight, stinky and oppressive emotionally as well as physically.

Did the tight workspace make you closer with the cast?

It accentuates what’s good and it accentuates what’s not good. It’s just like any relationship, the more contained the environment, the more the good stuff appears and the more the bad stuff will reveal itself.

Your character has an interesting arc in this. Brice starts out heroic but starts to walk the line of sanity as his guilt grows.

It’s really tricky to get a really clean bead on how close to the line to play it. Especially when you’re shooting out of sequence, it’s tricky to whether to turn the heat up higher or tone it down.

Do you relate with the Brice character?

Yeah. I think we all do. I think that’s a fear that we all have, that if we’re tested, maybe we won’t make the right choice.

Having done a lot of research can you imagine how explosive it would be to bring a woman on a submarine?

Oh yeah, and not least of which because of the classic seaman’s superstition of women bringing bad luck. That’s what instantly polarizes the crew. You realize that some of these men are really into superstition and some are not. And that’s what really defines the polarity that goes on throughout the movie. My character initially refuses to believe in anything otherworldly, but as he unravels, the more vulnerable he becomes and that fence gets taken down.

What do you think is the attraction of submarine movies?

I think, for starters, you can’t escape. Any kind of environment where you have characters with conflicting agendas and they can’t escape from one another, you know it’s going to unravel. So, with the contained environment there’s the promise of friction. That’s where the drama comes from.

"Below" opens in limited theaters on Friday, October 11
and goes wide on October 18, 2002

Check out the BELOW WEBSITE here

Source: JoBlo.com

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting

Movie Hottie Of The Week

More