Latest Movie News Headlines

Face-Off: Cloverfield vs. Monsters

03.08.2016by: Brian Bitner
In our previous Face-Off, ZOOLANDER took on ANCHORMAN: THE LEGEND OF RON BURGUNDY. While I gave ANCHORMAN the edge, and some of you were with me, it looks like more of you lean toward ZOOLANDER. Both films are definitely an acquired taste and require a certain tolerance for the idiotic, so I certainly won't fault anyone for preferring one over the other.

This weekend, we have 10 CLOVERFIELD LANE hitting theaters, which producer J.J. Abrams is calling a "blood relative" to 2008's CLOVERFIELD. Since the new film doesn't use the same found footage device as its spiritual predecessor, we'll have to wait to see exactly what the relationship is. The trailer certainly suggests the same horror/suspense/mystery/something's-out-there vibe, though, so this week we thought we'd look at CLOVERFIELD and MONSTERS, the 2010 alien invasion/border crossing film that put ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY director Gareth Edwards on the map.
CAST
Michael Stahl-David as Rob Hawkins
Jessica Lucas as Lily Ford
T.J. Miller as Hudson 'Hud' Platt
Mike Vogel as Jason Hawkins
Lizzy Caplan as Marlena Diamond
Odette Yustman as Beth McIntyre

Starring a fairly unknown cast in 2008, CLOVERFIELD now reads as a call sheet for some of the biggest shows on television. The cast charms us as a fun group of twenty-something partygoers job and makes a solid transition to terrified evacuees as shit gets real.
Scoot McNairy as Andrew Kaulder
Whitney Able as Sam Wynden





With about 95% of the film's dialogue, these two carry the story completely. Given the scarcity of the monsters, it's on the two leads to make us care about their situation. Fortunately, both give strong performances and help pull us into the reality of the world beautifully.
PLOT
When a giant monster appears in lower Manhattan, a group of friends attempt to save another friend before fleeing the city.


While there are elements of CLOVERFIELD that keep it from feeling like just another monster movie, the plot certainly isn't one. Having said that, I'm glad the filmmakers don't bog us down in the origin story of the creature.
A photographer is tasked with escorting his employer's daughter from Mexico across the U.S. border, which happens to be infected by large alien life forms.

So many alien/zombie/monster/horror movies take place at the moment of invasion. Like DISTRICT 9, MONSTERS drops us into a world in which the presence of the aliens is a way of life. Sociopolitical metaphors abound.
WRITING
In order to compress a lot of action into a short amount of time, CLOVERFIELD takes plenty of liberties in having our protagonists stumble into whatever situation they need to be in next. That said, the combination of humor, humanity, and drama really helps solidify the characters as real people.
MONSTERS' dialogue-heavy presentation feels more like a stage play than a film with monologues and character building driving the plot. The scenes can tend to feel a bit one note, however, and some moments of corny, "monster movie" dialogue keep this one from taking the point.
DIRECTING
While some found footage movies have been successful, the genre itself has never been terribly popular. Regardless, Matt Reeves uses this device well without it ever feeling too gimmicky or in your face. The cuts back to Rob's day with Beth are a nice touch and keep the heart of the story present.
Without a big budget, Gareth Edwards smartly uses tension and mystery to keep us intrigued. While we only catch a few glimpses of the monsters before the end, the gritty atmosphere and immediacy of the film make us believe we are a part of the world.
MONSTERS
The hype surrounding the monster in this film was so great that I think some of us couldn't help but be disappointed on the reveal. While the intent was to create something completely original, the alienness of the creature keeps it from feeling immediately real. Nevertheless, in fans' minds, Clover has earned a place in the pantheon of movie monsters, so I'll let it take the point here.
The MONSTERS monsters are even more alien and unreal feeling than Clover, with subpar CGI doing them no favors. Again it's the issue of the more you see, the less satisfied you are. There's something to be said for these creatures being presented as sympathetic characters in the end, but we'll get to that in a second.
FINALE
In true monster movie fashion, everyone dies (presumably). CLOVERFIELD depends so heavily on building the mystery of what the creature is that the ending feels a bit anticlimactic. After we get a few good looks at the beastie, it takes out the helicopter and leaves no survivors, and that's it. Kudos for the mysterious shot of something falling into ocean in Rob and Beth's final flashback scene, though.
As Andrew and Samantha await help, two aliens appear and share an intimate moment in their presence. While it's not a big monster movie action scene, it's a beautiful moment and the perfect ending for a film about two characters falling in love and learning what they truly value in life.
ENTERTAINMENT VALUE
CLOVERFIELD moves along at a nice, fast pace and offers plenty of jump scares and dramatic moments along the way. Add to the mix plenty of light moments from T.J. Miller and company, and you get a nicely well-rounded 85 minute ride.
This is where MONSTERS really loses points. Not only does the title of the film promise more action than it delivers, but the story itself can drag at times. While it's refreshing for a monster movie to focus more on character than theatricality, the drama really needs to be gripping and well-paced to keep us engaged.
ACCOLADES
IMDB: 7.1
Rotten Tomatoes: 77% (Audience Score: 68%)
Metacritic: 64 (User Score: 6.2)
IMDB: 6.4
Rotten Tomatoes: 72% (Audience Score: 52%)
Metacritic: 63 (User Score: 6.7)
CLOVERFIELD
When it comes down to it, MONSTERS is a drama with monsters, and CLOVERFIELD is a monster movie with drama, so it really depends what you're after. I really, really wanted to give this one to MONSTERS, but in rewatching both films, I found myself enjoying CLOVERFIELD more the second time around and MONSTERS less. While I'm a sucker for atmosphere and character-driven fare, MONSTERS just doesn't entertain the way CLOVERFIELD does- a huge point against a film that markets itself as a monster movie. Feel free to tell me I made the wrong choice, though; I certainly won't argue. Either way, 10 CLOVERFIELD LANE comes to town this Friday. Will you be heading to the theater to see what all the mystery's about?

Agree? Disagree? Which do you prefer?
POST YOUR CHOICE BELOW!

If you have a suggestion for a future Face-Off, let us know below or send me an email at brianbitner@joblo.com.

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

8:36AM on 03/09/2016
Monsters was decent, but I'd rather rewatch Cloverfield any day.
Monsters was decent, but I'd rather rewatch Cloverfield any day.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
6:06PM on 03/08/2016
I feel like Cloverfield was a really good American Kaiju film with kind of a boring, lumbering monster as its central focus, while Monsters was it's more cerebral cousin, with more focus on character building and with more imaginative creatures. Monsters CGI wasn't all that great, but it was made on a meager budget, so some credit has to be given there, but the look of the creatures was more impressive to me than the Cloverfield beast. Until the most recent Star Wars film, Abrhams and company
I feel like Cloverfield was a really good American Kaiju film with kind of a boring, lumbering monster as its central focus, while Monsters was it's more cerebral cousin, with more focus on character building and with more imaginative creatures. Monsters CGI wasn't all that great, but it was made on a meager budget, so some credit has to be given there, but the look of the creatures was more impressive to me than the Cloverfield beast. Until the most recent Star Wars film, Abrhams and company had a knack for creating boring creatures attached to really good storylines (Super 8 anyone?) but all and all, Cloverfield was the superior film, if only because it had the budget to be so.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+0
3:27PM on 03/08/2016

Agree with the verdict

Monsters is a fun enough little romp, and Edwards really does deserve some credit for pulling it off with he budget and resources that he had, but if you can get past the shakey cam, then Cloverfield truly is something special. It's got some of the best dialogue, characterization and one of the most realistic treatments of an attack from any monster movie I've seen.
Monsters is a fun enough little romp, and Edwards really does deserve some credit for pulling it off with he budget and resources that he had, but if you can get past the shakey cam, then Cloverfield truly is something special. It's got some of the best dialogue, characterization and one of the most realistic treatments of an attack from any monster movie I've seen.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
12:04PM on 03/08/2016
"with subpar CGI doing them no favors."
Well, there's only so much Edwards could pull off by himself. Yes, he did all the CG himself.
"with subpar CGI doing them no favors."
Well, there's only so much Edwards could pull off by himself. Yes, he did all the CG himself.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:04PM on 03/08/2016
I'm aware, but the end result is the same whether one person did it over five months or 100 people did it over five years.
I'm aware, but the end result is the same whether one person did it over five months or 100 people did it over five years.
+1
11:53AM on 03/08/2016

MONSTERS-5/10; CLOVERFIELD-8/10

[Spoilers ahead]

What you wrote isn't the finale of MONSTERS. The man and the woman are rescued by soldiers. One of them starts whistling. This reveals that their fate is what we saw in the opening scene: They're killed by the monsters. It was a great twist but, as you can see above, not enough for me to say that it should win this Face-Off.
[Spoilers ahead]

What you wrote isn't the finale of MONSTERS. The man and the woman are rescued by soldiers. One of them starts whistling. This reveals that their fate is what we saw in the opening scene: They're killed by the monsters. It was a great twist but, as you can see above, not enough for me to say that it should win this Face-Off.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:07PM on 03/08/2016
I feel like a complete idiot for never making that connection (or I made it the first time and had since forgotten). To be fair, the scene I mentioned is still the finale, as in it's how the movie ends, but to your point, it's not how the story ends.
I feel like a complete idiot for never making that connection (or I made it the first time and had since forgotten). To be fair, the scene I mentioned is still the finale, as in it's how the movie ends, but to your point, it's not how the story ends.
+2
11:33AM on 03/08/2016

Didn't love either

But Cloverfield was way better. Monsters sucked. I remember watching it at a hotel in Vancouver when I was doing laundry. Timothy Busfield and Sam Neill were there, Sam was doing Alcatraz. Don't remember what Timothy was doing, BUT ANYWAY, they saw me watching Monsters on my laptop and sat and watched it with me. I remember Sam Neill being a bit of a dick but Timothy had a lot to say about it. He friggin hated it. I will never forget the time I watched a terrible movie with two cool actor
But Cloverfield was way better. Monsters sucked. I remember watching it at a hotel in Vancouver when I was doing laundry. Timothy Busfield and Sam Neill were there, Sam was doing Alcatraz. Don't remember what Timothy was doing, BUT ANYWAY, they saw me watching Monsters on my laptop and sat and watched it with me. I remember Sam Neill being a bit of a dick but Timothy had a lot to say about it. He friggin hated it. I will never forget the time I watched a terrible movie with two cool actor dudes. It was refreshing to know that even some guys who were movie stars did laundry in the bottom of swanky hotels.
But man alive, I would never watch the sequel or anything with Scott McNairy again.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
11:13AM on 03/08/2016
I loved Cloverfield. Watched it many times. Saw Monsters once and thought it dragged a bit but I found it compelling. the pace was slow, but Monsters found a way to get under your skin.
For me Cloverfield wins.
I loved Cloverfield. Watched it many times. Saw Monsters once and thought it dragged a bit but I found it compelling. the pace was slow, but Monsters found a way to get under your skin.
For me Cloverfield wins.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
11:06AM on 03/08/2016
I've gotta say, however this sequel plays out, I will remember the first Cloverfield as being one of my most memorable movie going experiences ever. Even though I wasn't a fan of the found footage style, the viral marketing hooked me, and when I saw it in theaters the first time, I was literally on the edge of my seat the entire time. Immediately, I told anyone who would listen what a rollercoaster ride Cloverfield was, and went back to see it in theaters two more times. I have since
I've gotta say, however this sequel plays out, I will remember the first Cloverfield as being one of my most memorable movie going experiences ever. Even though I wasn't a fan of the found footage style, the viral marketing hooked me, and when I saw it in theaters the first time, I was literally on the edge of my seat the entire time. Immediately, I told anyone who would listen what a rollercoaster ride Cloverfield was, and went back to see it in theaters two more times. I have since rewatched it countless times. While maybe not being Oscar-perfect, I honestly believe it will be a film I find enjoyable and show my grandchildren years from now.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
10:50AM on 03/08/2016

Cloverfield

Still one of the best teaser trailers I've ever seen. I remember the huge mystery and acclaim it was getting before it was even released and I'm glad that 10 Cloverfield Lane is generating that same buzz.
Still one of the best teaser trailers I've ever seen. I remember the huge mystery and acclaim it was getting before it was even released and I'm glad that 10 Cloverfield Lane is generating that same buzz.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
10:30AM on 03/08/2016
Cloverfield for me. I remember when it was released it took everybody by surprise. People were talking about it all the time. As for the movie itself, it's one rare found footage movie that actually works.
Cloverfield for me. I remember when it was released it took everybody by surprise. People were talking about it all the time. As for the movie itself, it's one rare found footage movie that actually works.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting