Latest Entertainment News Headlines

Review: The Bag Man

The Bag Man
02.26.2014by:
2 10

PLOT: A hit man (John Cusack) holes up in a seedy motel while waiting for his boss (Robert De Niro) to come and claim a mysterious bag that he’s been asked to transport.

REVIEW: Remember how – after the one-two punch of RESERVOIR DOGS and PULP FICTION – cinemas in the mid-nineties were filled with Tarantino clones? So many indie directors hoped to get their share of his fame, and while some of these films were OK (THINGS TO DO IN DENVER WHEN YOU’RE DEAD), most were awful (FEELING MINNESOTA, TOUCH, DESTINY TURNS ON THE RADIO). THE BAG MAN – which is actually a hasty renaming as it was called MOTEL all throughout its production (which is also the title on the screener link I was sent by the production company) – feels like it belongs with the worst of the clones. It’s a movie that’s about fifteen years too late, but even then would have been seen as a bottom-of-the-barrel crime programmer.

The brainchild of director David Grovic, who also co-wrote the screenplay, THE BAG MAN somehow managed to attract a solid cast, with John Cusack in the lead. Cusack’s done this kind of part before, with his character here being more than a little reminiscent of his hit man anti-hero from GROSS POINTE BLANK, and its spiritual (if unofficial sequel) WAR INC. He even dresses like Blank (or maybe just Cusack himself) with a tough-guy black blazer off-set by a nice-guy baseball cap. THE BAG MAN also finds Cusack once again trapped in a creepy hotel/motel, similar to 1408 and IDENTITY.

Cusack’s pretty hit n’ miss these days. Whether or not you’re getting him at the top of his game really depends on the material, with him nailing a movie like THE FROZEN GROUND, but just as often sleepwalking through something like THE RAVEN or THE FACTORY. This is Cusack at a relatively low-ebb, although he’s never really bad. He does his job, but doesn’t seem overly inspired. For most of the film, he’s stuck with Rebecca Da Costa, playing the type of hooker you only see in the movies. A six-foot beauty who’s introduced wearing a Wonder Woman costume, Da Costa looks like she should be walking the catwalks of Milan, rather than be holed up in a seedy motel with Sticky Fingaz as her pimp (with his shaved head, eye-patch and choice of leather he looks like he’s on his way to a Halloween party dressed as Nick Fury).

Robert De Niro plays the baddie, a crime boss named Dragna, complete with an outrageous pompadour haircut, and lots of gold. If Fingaz looks like he’s trying to be Nick Fury, De Niro looks like he’s going for Liberace. Grovic tries to have fun with De Niro by giving him lots of Tarantino-inspired hipster dialogue, mixing high-brow references (Hermann Hesse) with the low-brow. Perhaps the only thing one could possibly say that’s original about THE BAG MAN is that it’ll likely be the only time you’ll ever see Robert De Niro talk about FULL HOUSE (although given his choices these days, maybe not). The only person here who really seems to be playing to all his strengths is Crispin Glover as the wheelchair bound, mullet-wearing concierge. Too bad he has such a small part.

Watching THE BAG MAN should make audiences thankful that the Tarantino-clone indie days are mostly gone (although movies like this and CATCH.44 seem bent on bringing them back). The copying here is pretty blatant, with Grovic spending lots of time making us wonder what’s actually in Cusack’s bag (he’s not supposed to look), which should seem familiar to anyone who remembers Marcellus Wallace’s case from PULP FICTION. The fact that you really won’t care what’s in there by the time the conclusion rolls around is probably the movie’s biggest failing. While the names De Niro and Cusack will probably mean some won’t be able to resist checking this out on VOD, this is probably one of the worst films either man has appeared in for a while, which is saying something.

Source: JoBlo.com

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

12:38PM on 02/26/2014
Cusack looks like a man trying a little too hard to not grow as an actor, despite a better range than people give him credit for. I've been binging on his movies lately and The Bag Man feels like another paycheck role, like The Factory. He's an interesting actor who should be getting higher profile roles in better productions.
Cusack looks like a man trying a little too hard to not grow as an actor, despite a better range than people give him credit for. I've been binging on his movies lately and The Bag Man feels like another paycheck role, like The Factory. He's an interesting actor who should be getting higher profile roles in better productions.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
10:50AM on 02/26/2014
Why is Cusack in this kind of shitty movies, and Colin Farrell keep making flops for big Hollywood studios? Cusack didn`t make as much box office flops as Farrell, so I don't understand why is he fallin so low.
Why is Cusack in this kind of shitty movies, and Colin Farrell keep making flops for big Hollywood studios? Cusack didn`t make as much box office flops as Farrell, so I don't understand why is he fallin so low.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
12:46PM on 02/26/2014
The irony is that, from what little research I've gathered, their paychecks are close in size. Farrell commands around $3MM for a supporting role and $7MM for a lead, though he's also sprinkled in plenty of indie-ish fare like Seven Psychopaths. Cusack takes between $2MM and $5MM, generally speaking, depending on the size, though obviously he does scale work like Martian Child. But stuff like The Factory he did for money. It may have looked cheap and gotten zero distribution, but it was a $25MM
The irony is that, from what little research I've gathered, their paychecks are close in size. Farrell commands around $3MM for a supporting role and $7MM for a lead, though he's also sprinkled in plenty of indie-ish fare like Seven Psychopaths. Cusack takes between $2MM and $5MM, generally speaking, depending on the size, though obviously he does scale work like Martian Child. But stuff like The Factory he did for money. It may have looked cheap and gotten zero distribution, but it was a $25MM budget with limited sets, effects or star power, so it's easy to assume they paid Cusack A TON.
A bunch of actors are doing this of late. Bruce Willis makes $1-5MM for all those 50 Cent movies and any other DTV crap he's in (like Catch .44) They take a lot of money to be in a small movie that somehow got investors to pony up, even knowing how crappy the movie would end up being. I think Cusack has been making a small fortune from this stuff.
For whatever reason, they're more willing to do this than to do passion projects with great scripts for no money on low budgets. For what it's worth, Cusack's politics are still strongly liberal, even if his work ethic has become ever more conservative.
2:05AM on 02/26/2014
I wonder if John Cusack's character asks how Crispin Glover's character lost his arm.
I wonder if John Cusack's character asks how Crispin Glover's character lost his arm.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+3
1:11AM on 02/26/2014
Does Bobby have THAT many bills? JEEZIS KRISTE! But then again... I guess when your Bobby DeNiro and no longer have anything to prove, you can pretty much do whatever the fuck you want at this point.
Does Bobby have THAT many bills? JEEZIS KRISTE! But then again... I guess when your Bobby DeNiro and no longer have anything to prove, you can pretty much do whatever the fuck you want at this point.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:02AM on 02/26/2014
Looks like John's up for a "Movie Jail" trail soon...
Looks like John's up for a "Movie Jail" trail soon...
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...
JoBlo's T-Shirt Shoppe | support our site... Wear Our Gear!