Latest Movie News Headlines

INT: Michel Gondry

Dec. 5, 2008by: JimmyO
100%

Ive always found Michel Gondry to be a bright star in the world of film. ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF A SPOTLESS MIND is easily one of my favorites and he always seems to bring out a certain flair with his actors. Recently, he brought us BE KIND REWIND which I enjoyed because of the idea of making a movie a communal experience. I actually liked the film more the second time around. As for his other work, Im a huge fan of the videos he has done with Bjork. Gondrys world is strange and beautiful and one that Im looking forward to seeing him explore continually.

Ive chatted with him before at the junket for BE KIND REWIND. But it is amazing the difference of spending five minutes with him as opposed to chatting with him on the phone for almost forty minutes. He is invigoratingly honest about what he does. He was very open about his dislike for media, yet he freely admits that he profits from making commercials in order to continue making the movies he loves. He was also honest about the kinds of films he appreciates and the ones he doesnt.

But ironically, he was talking to me about his latest artistic endeavor. It is a book entitled Youll Like This Film Because Youre In It: The Be Kind Rewind Protocol. In it, he opens up the idea of letting your creativity flow by picking up a video camera and expressing your own unique thoughts and views. Not in an attempt to send it to YouTube and become a star. Simply put, to share the experience of seeing yourself and friends and family in an open and creative way. I highly recommend the book and maybe creating your own art, in a unique and personal way.

Now Im looking at your book, Youll Like This Film Because Youre In It: The Be Kind Rewind Protocol and the thing that strikes me most is the design. It is very thin with small text and it is very unique.

Well I wanted to [I didnt want to take up] too much space [with it]. Because it was really not about art, it was much more about social experiment or about community. So I wanted the book to reflect more on its more of a guide. And I wish it would be a little cheaper but there was nothing I could do about the price. I really wanted to make it about the content and not the presentation. So it was important to me in fact its a book you can carry, I like the shape of books where you can put them in your pocket and read them in the subway. Its different than your typical coffee table book.

Well, its funny, its true because I was carrying it around reading it wherever I would go. Aside from that, its a really good read because you begin with a little bit of your history which is quite fascinating. How personal did you want to get with it?

Well, I dont have much to say except about my own experience. So, as well, when I write my movies it is difficult for me to step outside of my life. So I really wanted to use this medium for one time, because as you say, you can carry a book anywhere. You dont need any appliance to read it. And I wanted to really use it for what it is, I wanted to make a book to show images. I have to say it has to be related very deeply to my experience. Otherwise I dont think I think I have strength in relating events that occur to me obviously with my subjectivity. I dont have a real strength to invent a situation. So I thought of going through my memory and take bits there and there and combine them and what is associated with them.

I like that personal connection that you have and I think we talked about this last time, but all your movies seem to have the Gondry touch as it were. And with this book, you are taking your ideas into another level and as you say, it is meant to be a guide. Or maybe is it more to inspire people?

I think both, I really wrote it as a guide and I re-wrote the protocol and people can photocopy. Because the thing I worked quite hard to make is a system of working for a lot of different situations. I encourage people to do it, but its like you can read in the book how to do things, but they do not necessarily need to use it to make the things they describe. You can just read them and get inspired and enjoy reading them. But I think it should work if you want to have the experience yourself, it would work. Because I did it myself and it always works.

How did the workshops come about? Can you describe a little bit about what they entailed including finding the filmmakers themselves?

Well, the purpose wasnt to pick filmmakers. It was to show that anyone can participate. To see that any one of them had potential. And we really sort of trained to ignore that [filmmaker] idea. So it was really trying to reach out to the most regular people. We tried to give room to people that were a little harder to reach. We opened for schools with different types of kids coming from different types of backgrounds. Because I really wanted to give this opportunity to everyone possible. And one more time, its really not about filmmaking. I have no pretension to teach anyone. I dont think people should leave the experience thinking they are going to become a filmmaker I have no pretension to be a guide for that. It is more a guide for a community [experience], that was what was important to me.

What I like about the idea is that way back when, theatre really was a communal experience. It wasnt merely a way to showcase ones talent. It really was a community event. And I think what you are describing here is to offer film and its ideas to a community. And not just putting yourself on YouTube to get it seen.

Yeah, I really encourage people to not put their film on YouTube. Because well I think YouTube is great and the net is great in general. But there is something in the action of putting up your work on YouTube I think that [the] protocol really adds a dimension of a balanced level between the people who create the work and the people who experience it. I really wanted to even that out, and it is the opposite of YouTube, or any medium that sort of concentrates on one experience and project it to millions of viewers. Which is about being a star or being famous and being seen at the same time by millions of people. My experience is really about making something at home for yourself. So its in contradiction with a strong exposition.

How do you feel, as a filmmaker yourself where do you see the future of filmmaking? A lot of people seem to be looking towards the internet right now and surpassing an actual movie theatre.

Yeah its difficult, to be able to tell you the future of filmmaking I still feel Im new in the medium. I still have to sort of prove myself so it is very hard to answer this question. I mean, things can take the most unexpected turn. Its like in politics, when I was young we always assumed that the communist block would never change and then one day it all collapsed and it was such a shock then. It is very hard to predict whats going to happen. I mean, when youre a kid, your strategy for the future with career and jobs, you have no idea what youre going to need as an adult. Like when I was a kid, all the kids with average grades went into what we used to call technical drawing. Basically you would draw a piece of a machine. Like, literarily a third of students went to learn that. And like, five years after, it was completely obsolete because of the use of computers. So it is just coincidences that you happen to tap into something that is going to become very important in the future. You cannot predict that, its complicated. So I have no idea. Like people said for twenty years that film cameras would be gone in five years, and it still remained. Of course there is more and more video and digital, but all good film cameras are still around. I think it is very presumptuous to give the future.

Now Id like to go back a little to your film BE KIND REWIND. It sort of reminded me of one of my favorite movies, CINEMA PARADISO. Had you been a fan of that film?

I liked the movie and of course I had seen it before I did BE KIND REWIND, but it is a little too sentimental for me. Probably it is a better film than BE KIND REWIND so I should not judge, Im not judging it, its more in terms of my taste. I find it a little too sentimental. But I [sometimes] like sentimental. Im a big fan of Chaplin and people always complain that he is too sentimental. But I dont necessarily like movies about movies. Like I really dislike Francois Truffauts DAY FOR NIGHT.

Really?

Yeah. Its very pretentious very its a bunch of lies. It says movies are like trains in the night, you can stop there its a bunch of garbage. Im not a big Truffaut fan, I have to say. And one more time, it is very arrogant of me to say that, but I think, especially since he is not around to hear me so Im not going to hurt him by saying stuff against him. But I know he started as a film critic, and he was extremely violent towards the directors before him. He was the most aggressive film critic. He was very dismissive and then he did what he despised. He was the classical of the classical. He was the conservatism in filmmaking at the end. At least Jean-Luc Godard always had renewed himself he had this attitude as well, but at least he didnt do what he criticized before. So, I think that I would I like better, Vittorio De Sica for instance. His movies about cinema are much more social. When you look at MIRACLE IN MILANO his movies have a strong social message in them. He is on the side of people you know, on the side to help people in poverty. Then if you compare to Frank Capra who did sort of, very popular movies, they are much more conservative politically.

Now do you think, talking politics and talking filmmaking, do you think that it is a filmmakers duty to represent their own views with their films?

Well, I dont know if it is a duty. As I grew up, I sort of educated myself a little, where you should be able to sustain a political conversation, which I was very shy about to engage before because I lacked references and data and background. But as I grow older, you cant close your eyes. In the beginning I thought that being an artist was political enough. You create entertainment and you explain the world through your eyes. But getting a little older, it is very hard for me to take a typical screenplay because they express their view and I dont want to speak for them. So I was really tempted to [take on a certain screenplay] that was going to be a big success, but at the end, I felt that this guy was expressing things that are different from my views so I have no interest into putting my energy to express his views. Especially with something that is so polar opposite of me. Like one of the main characters was very condescending to one of the homeless people and I could never do that in my movie.

So I feel more and more I have to let [my beliefs] through, but its hard because I dont feel I have the I mean, I can talk about my memories, my feelings, the process of creation and creativity. And through that, I tend to have a social orientation. More and more I feel that we are constantly brainwashed by the media about Libertism, this so called, narrow Libertism which is a way to disguise social regression. Its just that I want to have the right language to express it. I dont watch T.V. because I dont like to be controlled. But I watch DVDs and I watch some shows on the net, but I watch a lot of the commentaries on DVDs. But I dont have many channels or cable. I think I dont want to be proposed what I have to see, I want to decide that. And I know that I am making a contradiction because I shoot advertising once in a while. Although I do attempt to do less and less. If I had any input Id make advertising disappear, even though I make good money out of it. Because I really, truly believe it is bad. Ive worked for Levis, Coca Cola and I dont know what they do to the world. So Im in contradiction, I know that, and I have little for my defense. My main defense is, I do the films I want because I make a living doing other stuff. So I really have a lot of freedom with making movies which is the most important thing to me.

As for future projects, MASTER OF SPACE AND TIME is not going to happen?

No, no, no, its been a long time since, we didnt touch it. We tried very hard but the story is too complicated. Basically, you need enough money to create the world. I like the story because it is written by a mathematician, Rudy Rucker and the mathematics are part of the story and that doesnt interest the producer. It is something that doesnt interest them. So in order to make it happen I would have to rule out all of what makes this book unique, so I decided not to do it.

What is next for you?

I wrote a screenplay that I will try to shoot soon. And Im developing two stories. One with Dan Clowes [GHOST WORLD] as the writer, it is going to be an animated film. The other is called THE RETURN OF THE ICE KINGS, I wrote a draft. I even wrote it with my girlfriend Gabrielle Bell, although we are not together anymore. But we wrote a draft together.

Now with writing the book, do you plan to do more?

Yeah, yeah, yeah, but I want this book to have the time to exist.

Let me know what you think. Send questions and/or comments to JimmyO@JoBlo.com.

Source: JoBlo.com

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

1:07PM on 12/12/2008

Too bad about Master of Space and Time

I had heard the rumors about Rudy Rucker's great cyberpunk romp being made into a film directed by Gondry, script by Dan Clowes, and starring Jack Black... it's too bad it's not going to happen.
I had heard the rumors about Rudy Rucker's great cyberpunk romp being made into a film directed by Gondry, script by Dan Clowes, and starring Jack Black... it's too bad it's not going to happen.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Movie News Headlines


Top
Loading...
JoBlo's T-Shirt Shoppe | support our site... Wear Our Gear!