With their extremely lucrative collaboration on the SCREAM films, it was thought by many to be a sure thing when director Wes Craven and writer Kevin Williamson united again for CURSED (read JoBlo's review here). This sentiment was quickly proved wrong early in the shoot, when production problems arose and script issues became painfully apparent. Production was eventually halted completely as Williamson opted for a complete re-write of the problematic script. Craven eventually re-shot most of the film with a radically altered storyline and cast. Was it all worth it? Weíll find out on Monday when the box office numbers are in.
The CURSED ďjunketĒ last week consisted of one interview: stars Jesse Eisenberg and Christina Ricci. To their credit, they were pretty candid about the problems that CURSED faced. Here are some excerpts from their interview.
|Christina Ricci||Jesse Eisenberg|
was it like working with Wes Craven?
Christina Ricci (CR): Heís great. I mean, heís Wes Craven. Heís incredibly experienced and this is like his thing and what he does best, and heís just very laid back and smart and sarcastic and dry. He doesnít let anything really upset him too much. Weíre there to make a movie, but itís going to be fun.
Jesse Eisenberg (JE): I think also because heís been doing it so long and has such a command of the genre that everybody on the set has a great amount of respect for him and patience, not that he takes a long time, but thereís a general understanding that the outcome is going to be that much better, or thereís a general understanding that the outcome, thereís a confidence that what we were doing was worthwhile.
We know that Wes re-shot much of the film. How did the story change?
It changed quite a bit. We werenít related in the original
version. We just both happened to be involved in this crash, and
then when we came back we were brother and sister, and Josh wasnít
in the original one. He wasnít. No, and there was no club that
anybody was opening.
No. There was a wax museum. They were able to keep some of the great
effects, but the story, I think, is improved, but I mean I think the
final product is now better, but I think they were able to keep some
of the great effects or some of the more expensive things that still
fit into the story.
the time, did you agree with the decision to re-shoot the movie?
CR: Well, we werenít seeing dailies, and I think it was everyone who was watching the dailies that they were the ones who could see that it wasnít really working. When youíre not seeing whatís actually on camera, sometimes itís hard... I mean, the final product of any movie usually feels like a totally alien thing than what youíve been shooting anyway, so we wouldnít really be able to have that perspective or the objectivity to know that it wasnít really going quite right.
did you begin shooting the film?
Oh a year, two years ago. Yeah, it will be two years this March.
difficult was it to maintain continuity for your performance when
there was a possibility that footage from both versions might be
Very little of it was kept, so there wasnít really...
none of the original scenes were used for the final film?
There were some. And if the case was youíve exited the door in a
scene that we shot five months ago and now itís the scene that
happens right after you come through the door, then I would watch;
he would show us what we were following so we could
kind of get back into that.
Were there any collaborations with people that didnít make it, or scenes you got right the first time that you were disappointed to lose?
Yeah, I mean, originally, when we first were shooting, Skeet Ulrich
was in the movie. And by the time they had reworked the script and
everything, he didnít like the way his character had been changed.
And so he didnít want to be involved anymore. And that was sort of
sad. He was a love interest of my character. He was involved in the
crash. It was the three of us involved in a crash, and then he and I
startÖwe become attracted to each other. But the way it was
rewritten, he just didnít feel like there was enough to make him
really want to be in the second version.
I think the part that he was originally doing was eliminated
essentially. So I think the interest for him, whatever that was at
the time, may have not carried over to that new character.
scenes you thought you nailed the first time?
JE: No, I mean, I never feel that way, so I was kind of excited to get another shot at it.
All that stuff, all the school stuff, thatís in the first one,
Yeah, actually, I think a lot of the stuff that I did in the first
version, if anything was kind of retained. I think most of the stuff
I had done, because it was out of the context of the old story, so
yes, so thereís the stuff in the beginning.
The stuff on Hollywood Boulevard in the beginning I think was
there, and I think a more significant scene, the fight with the
golden retriever, that was also retained and I know that was
important to keep because itís really exciting and also probably
an expensive venture.
they made you related, what layer did that add to the story?
JE: It kind of grounded it emotionally. The first story was about strangers who meet and have to join together and stuff Ė which seemed to work, because I read the script and really liked the first one Ė but I guess whoeverís decision it was to change it didnít think it worked as well. But having a family as the focus of the movie, and the family suffered a loss. Our parents had been killed prior to the movie, so it certainly grounds it emotionally.
how long after Monster did you begin work on Cursed?
CR: Two weeks.
was it like moving from material that was more reality-based and
serious to a supernatural story like this one?
CR: Well, thatís one of the reasons that I took this movie, was that monster was so heavy and sort of an emotional journey. I mean, Monster was a great experience because I loved working with Charlize and I loved the director, Patty . But at the same time, when youíre working with material that is that dark, eventually youíre just going to feel a little bit heavy. So I literally landed in LA after filming that, coming back from Orlando, and my agentís like ďOkay, you need to go tomorrow to meet on the Wes Craven movie that you can do starting in two weeks if you want to.Ē I was like, ďYeah, that sounds good. Something lighter, like playing a normal person whoís running around and screaming. That sounds good, okay.Ē
the critical acclaim of Monster changed the scripts that
youíre getting offered?
Um, no, not really. I think itís always a great thing to be in a
movie that was so good and that affected so many people. I think
thatís always a good thing. I
canít say that it changed my career that much, but Iím happy to
have done it.
you tell us anything about The White Rose?
Thatís a project thatís just still in the early stages of
development. Itís based on a graphic novel. Itís sort of a young
girl whoís taken under the wing of a cat burglar, and then sheís
raised to be a cat burglar and her signature is a white rose. And
then something goes wrong and then thereís a movie.
happening with Prozac Nation?
CR: Now, theyíve sold it to Starz On Demand.
has that experience been like for you?
Itís extremely disappointing. Extremely disappointing.
do you approach your roles?
CR: I think it really does depend on what youíre going to be playing, who youíre going to be playing. A lot of times, if a character has a lot ofÖif thereís a lot of technical truths that you need to learn, any kind of training, then you might start there. And that will sort of influence the character and youíll see how that would change a personality. And then trying to just do whatever the director wants. If he likes to rehearse for three weeks, then thatís how you find it. I think for me it really depends.
about this movie?
CR: Nothing. I was hired literally two weeks before we started shooting. And we did a lot of fittings.
JE: Yeah, the nature of the movie is not necessarily performance driven. But thatís not to say that it detracts from the quality of the movie. It focuses on other things and weíre doing our jobs and do it as well as we are required to do it. But also, itís a more whimsical movie. Itís not as heavy as a movie. It is in the sense that awful things are happening, but in terms of overall tone, itís not taken as seriously as something likeÖ
Itís not a drama.
are the differences between working on an indie film, like Rodger
Dodger, and a big budget one?
Itís different in almost every way in terms of the production of
it. This I think was schedule for 60 something days and that movie
(Roger Dodger) was 20 days and I just did a movie that was 23 days,
also similar. It took place in
Yeah, I had no respect at all.
Oh, really? But no, I didnít realize the set is quieter in a more
emotional scene. I didnít realize there would be a respect for it
because to me it just looks like a horror movie. It seems like they
wouldnít take what I was doing as seriously. But I found it to be
the opposite, so it was nice.
what do you play in Squid and the Whale and when will we see it?
I think itís coming out in October. I playÖitís about a family
going through a divorce in 1986 in
playing him and heís watching your performance?
Yeah, I think it was moreÖwell, I had auditioned for it like eight
times over the course of two years, so I felt that I hadÖI felt
comfortable being there. The people who played my parents were also
being scrutinized in kind of a different way, I think. And I think
for them, it was more being scrutinized by an outsider so it was
more of a biased approach. But for me, I felt pretty confident being
there. There was a
really time-consuming and rigorous rehearsal process because it was
such a personal story for the filmmaker.
did you meet the person you played in Monster?
CR: No, she wanted to have nothing to do with the movie. She had already sold her rights off to somebody else, so they changedÖyou know, my characterís name is changed. Itís not her real name. And we really had to make sure, I think Patty in writing the screenplay made sure that my character did not too clearly represent the girl that I was supposed to be representing.
what will we see you in next?
The next thing Iím in thatís coming out is a movie called I Love
Your Work with Giovanni Ribisi and Franke Potente that Adam
(Goldberg) wrote and directed. Itís
sort of a Faustian tale about this actor who wants to be famous so
badly and when he does get the life he thought he wanted, all of a
sudden, he realized he sold his soul to the devil really. So
IímÖhe has flashbacks of his ex-girlfriends, the girl he sold
out to get where he is, the girl he betrayed and thatís me.
feel as if you sold your soul for success?
Oh yeah, long, long time ago.
Would you be interested in a Cursed sequel, or did the extensive re-shoots sour you?
We start on the sequel next week, so we donít have a choice.
No, these kinds of movies are really fun to make. I think as an
actor sometimes youíre in the mood to be really serious and do
something really hard and thought-provoking. But then the other side
of it is, Oh, but I could just have a great time running around
doing action-y types of things and being chased by something. Or I
could do that in my spare time.
Questions? Comments? Manifestos? Send them to me at firstname.lastname@example.org.