More Avatar pics | Movie News
More Avatar pics
Dec. 2, 2009
![]()
Well, it's been almost 48 hours since we've written anything new about AVATAR, so there's got to be some of you out there jonesing for your fix. Annnd also some of you that probably never want to hear about this movie again, so you might as well just go read about BOOB right now.
But for those of you ailing, I've got the medicine right here in the form of a handful of new pics from the film. Check a few of them out below, and click to head over to our AVATAR movie page to see larger versions of all of them.
Source: JoBlo
Extra Tidbit: 7PM Friday the 18th, IMAX 3D @ AMC 20 in Livonia, MI. Just bought 'em, see you there.

Most Popular Movie News

























































































1:32AM on 12/04/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
8:30AM on 12/03/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:53AM on 12/03/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
can anyone explain?
can anyone explain?
12:15AM on 12/03/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:50PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
12:52AM on 12/03/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
9:14PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
It is fact that gollum looks and acts more realistic than Jar Jar Binks. It's fact that the compositing in 2012 looks better than the compositing in Independence Day. Some guy can...
It is fact that gollum looks and acts more realistic than Jar Jar Binks. It's fact that the compositing in 2012 looks better than the compositing in Independence Day. Some guy can come along and say, "NU-UH!" but the vast majority is going hear that and assume he's either got some kind of chip on his shoulder regarding the subject matter, or he's just plain stupid.
If there were no giant blue aliens in those jungle shots, and it was just the camera pointing at the backgrounds, there's not a doubt in my mind that you and anyone else would not be able to tell that it was CG. They couldn't possibly look any more real.
Have you seen the 4 minute clip where Jake jumps into the waterfall? That water could not possibly look any more real. The layman is going to assume that the only digital thing in the frame is the alien. This is an incredible achievement that you, for some inane reason, seem determined to ignore.
At 1:40 in the very first teaser for the movie there's a closeup of Ney'tiri that just absolutely cannot look any more real. Even if this were the only shot in the film that was this good, it's still easily the most convincing, realistic CG character ever created. Hands down.
It's not a matter of opinion when you can go back and grab footage of every other digital character ever made and compare them side by side. Although if you have to do that to be convinced, you may need to get your eyes checked.
8:21PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I'm not rushing out to see this opening night but I'll be there opening day.
I'm not rushing out to see this opening night but I'll be there opening day.
7:12PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
And it seems we're just on completely different sides of the fence with this one. The best effects in Jurassic Park were the animatronics? I think the opposite is true. It was always glaringly obvious when it was an animatronic. The movement was terrible and totally destroyed the illusion.
But I...
And it seems we're just on completely different sides of the fence with this one. The best effects in Jurassic Park were the animatronics? I think the opposite is true. It was always glaringly obvious when it was an animatronic. The movement was terrible and totally destroyed the illusion.
But I digress.
When we're talking about the most realistic CG characters ever created there isn't much room for opinion. Up until now it would be Gollum or King Kong, but Avatar pushes the envelope further than ever before. The vast majority of industry artists will agree with that statement and anyone with a pair of eyeballs that is capable of getting past the fact that "They look like space smurfs! LOL!" will as well.
You do realize that every shot in the jungle is all computer generated, right? For you to compare that to the crappy matte paintings and horrible CG backgrounds in Phantom Menace renders your opinion practically useless.
7:20PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
6:16PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:34PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
What you're ignoring is the FACT that this movie not only contains the most realistic computer-generated effects ever created, but that the AMOUNT of those effects is also unparalleled.
What you're ignoring is the FACT that this movie not only contains the most realistic computer-generated effects ever created, but that the AMOUNT of those effects is also unparalleled.
Cameron promised a seamless experience, and you can't deny that many of the shots we've seen from this flick couldn't possibly look more real. Not all of them, of course. But a lot.
Also, Cameron has been touting the CG character's performances more than anything else. And in that regard, he is absolutely delivering what he promised. Jake and Ney'tiri's expressions and acting are practically exact replica's of Sam and Zooey's. This is a fact.
emjoi - Are you blind? And mildly retarded?
6:50PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:26PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
4:52PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
4:52PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Woot! First Melbourne showing, cannot wait!
Woot! First Melbourne showing, cannot wait!
4:35PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Sometimes it's not too bad living on the UK, almost makes up for 'UP' being released 6 months later than in he UK.
Sometimes it's not too bad living on the UK, almost makes up for 'UP' being released 6 months later than in he UK.
4:15PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:33PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:14PM on 12/02/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I just don't see it having the same appeal to a wide audience that Titanic did. The "older" generation is sick of CGI, the younger generation doesn't...
I just don't see it having the same appeal to a wide audience that Titanic did. The "older" generation is sick of CGI, the younger generation doesn't know who James Cameron is and the love story hasn't been sold to the women moviegoers.
I hope it does well but I really can't see it topping more then 350 million in the US and that's being generous.