Latest Entertainment News Headlines

Review: Charlie Wilson's War

Charlie Wilson's War
12.06.2007
8 10


Plot: Charlie Wilson (Tom Hanks) is a womanizing, boozing Texas Congressmen whose concerns include ogling his young, all-female staff and doing just enough to get re-elected every few years. But when a news story about the war in Afghanistan catches his eye, Wilson soon finds himself working with a wealthy socialite (Julia Roberts) and a brash CIA agent (Phillip Seymour Hoffman) to single-handedly and secretly fund the Afghani’s war against the Soviets, a course of action that eventually helped to end a little skirmish called the Cold War.



Review: CHARLIE WILSON’S WAR had an impressive pedigree behind and in front of the camera, but the tone of the trailer (the one with the bizarre use of Don McLean’s “American Pie”) was confusing, as was the awful poster. That one-sheet makes it look like the only war Wilson is involved in is fighting the urge to headbutt Julia Roberts. Or to pretend that a midget Phil Hoffman isn’t giving him a creepy FATAL ATTRACTION stare. It definitely doesn’t convey that CHARLIE WILSON’S WAR is an intelligent, funny and all-around entertaining film about the United States’ historical involvement in the Middle East.

That’s right, I said funny; Tom Hanks is finally back doing comedy. (I don’t count THE LADYKILLERS, and if you even mention THE TERMINAL we will have words. Outside.) Wilson is a fantastic role for Hanks; charming, intelligent and with a wicked sense of humor. The character also has a bit of a dark streak as well. The movie opens with Wilson naked in a hot tub with strippers, cocaine and a Playboy bunny. And yes, you see Forrest Gump’s exposed posterior. While Hanks, and the audience, obviously has fun with the seemingly sleazy Wilson, he brings the emotion and pathos to the character when it counts. You really believe that deep down the guy wanted to help the people of Afghanistan, which makes a huge difference in how you leave the film.

Mike Nichol’s direction is confident, yet not showy and the few action scenes are surprisingly well-done. However, the movie entirely belongs to a fantastic script by Aaron Sorkin (The West Wing, Sports Night). There were numerous places where CHARLIE WILSON’S WAR could’ve gone wrong, but Sorkin pulls it all together. For one, the tone works much better in the film than it does in the trailer, balancing a lighter satire feel with some serious dramatic moments, and even a few exciting action beats—a feat that shouldn’t be surprising if you’ve seen any of Sorkin’s television work. The script also manages to be informative and entertaining at the same time, with the film covering a lot of material regarding politics, religion, foreign policy and history. Overall, it could’ve used more of a climax, but nothing felt out of place or superfluous, and most of the movie gets by on just being damn funny.



Sorkin’s personal political beliefs aren’t really a secret (especially if you watched three or more minutes of his last television venture, Studio 60). The man easily could’ve picked sides, especially with this topic, but he does well to avoid pointing fingers or overly politicizing things. This is just the story of Charlie Wilson, straight up. No soapbox preaching. And no watering down, thank God. The film does a good job openly explaining what’s going on for the uninitiated, but aside from a few recognizable names (mentions of Rudy Guliani and John Murtha got a chuckle from the audience), a lot of the connections to our modern conflict and situation you have to make yourself. It’s nice when a script has faith in the audience and, more importantly, doesn’t talk down to them. I shudder to think what CHARLIE WILSON’S WAR would be like had it been written by Paul Haggis. (“Hmmm, we messed up in Afghanistan then…and it’s a mess now. I figured out the connection! Give me an Oscar!”)

I’d be remiss if I didn’t at least mention the rest of the cast. Phillip Seymour Hoffman is dynamite as a bitter, smartasshole spy, stealing so many scenes he should be arrested for grand larceny. I’d say a Best Supporting Actor nod is pretty much a sure thing. Julia Roberts, back from her big screen break and looking an awful lot like Skeletor, is fine as the “sixth wealthiest woman in Texas,” but her role wasn’t as big as I expected. Romantic longing between her character and Wilson was hinted at, but the script didn’t really seem to care about it too much. (Neither did I.) Then there’s Amy Adams, who does her best to give a bit of depth to Wilson’s assistant, though I wish she had been given more to do. And not just because Adams is painfully cute; there were a few spots where you could tell there was more going on with her character, but it wasn’t ever explored.

CHARLIE WILSON’S WAR is probably not the powerhouse Oscar film Universal was hoping for (Hoffman and Sorkin’s script are probably the only sure things), but it was still a smart and enjoyable movie that handled its political subject matter with charm and wit, and made even more fascinating because it all really happened.

My Rating: 8/10

CLICK IMAGE TO OPEN GALLERY & SEE MORE PICS...

Source: JoBlo.com

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting

Movie Hottie Of The Week

More