Latest Entertainment News Headlines

Review: Cosmopolis

Cosmopolis
05.30.2012
5 10

PLOT: Eric Packer (Robert Pattinson) - a billionaire asset manager, travels in his high-tech stretch limo across NYC to get a haircut. Along the way, he confers with various employees, an art dealer (Juliette Binoche), a financial guru (Samantha Morton), and pursues his distant wife (Sarah Gadon). He also dodges periodic assassination attempts, and various riots.

REVIEW: COSMOPOLIS is a film I wanted to like. While I’d never say David Cronenberg is a can’t miss director for me (his films are too divisive for that- and that’s what makes them interesting), more than not, I tend to go for his movies in a big way. I love early Cronenberg (SCANNERS, VIDEODROME, THE DEAD ZONE, THE FLY and DEAD RINGERS), and both HISTORY OF VIOLENCE and EASTERN PROMISES struck me as good as anything he’s ever done.

Of course, there was the Robert Pattinson factor, but if Cronenberg was able to see something in him for the part, I was all for it. Worse actors than Pattinson have come into their own with the right role, but sadly- this isn’t it. To me anyways.

You see, I have a feeling COSMOPOLIS is going to have a lot of fans, even if I’m not one. It’s not that I thought it was an awful film, but it’s just far too talky, dull and pretentious to really work for me as anything other than a bore. As a book- I’m sure Don DeLillo’s novel was thought-provoking. As a film, it borders on excruciating. Cronenberg seems to have instructed all of his actors to perform in a strangely passive, vacant way, and Pattinson- who’s often been accused of this before, fits right in in this regard. But damn if he’s not dull, dull, DULL.


I get that he’s supposed to be playing this numb billionaire, who only feels alive on the brink of ruin- but his performance is so one-note that even if he’s starting to get some kind of edge towards the end, you’d never know it. He’s downright robotic throughout, although perhaps this was Cronenberg’s intention. Sarah Gadon, who plays his wife (with whom his marriage has yet to be consummated) acts the same way, as does Samantha Morton in her one scene. Their performances are contrasted by those of Juliette Binoche, as his art-dealer/mistress, with whom he engages in some vigorous limo sex, and Paul Giamatti- with the whole last half hour of the film being a one-on-one dialogue between the cold R-Pat, and the fiery Giamatti.


One thing that’s important to note is that the early trailers have really misrepresented COSMOPOLIS. Anyone who thought this looked like a return to body-horror for Cronenberg will no doubt be disappointed, as this is pretty much all talk, talk, talk. As is Cronenberg’s custom, there are brief flashes of unexpected violence, as well as a truly strange scene where Pattinson flirts with an employee while getting a prostate exam (which I sure, will totally mess with Twi-hards).

But- as I prefaced this review, I’m certain that some folks will love this, particularly if you’re a hardcore Cronenberg, or DeLillo devotee. Granted, the subject matter is extremely relevant (the riots in the film couldn't help but remind me of Toronto's G8 riots, or Montreal's ongoing student strike). Maybe in a few years I’ll revisit this, but for now, I have to chalk this one up as a big let-down.

CLICK IMAGE TO OPEN GALLERY & SEE MORE PICS...

Extra Tidbit: This is supposed to be set in NYC, but it's clearly Toronto.
Source: JoBlo.com

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

12:16PM on 07/13/2012

what to think???

I am a huge cronenberg fan, but I agree with you I like his earlier stuff like The Fly and HELLOOOO eXistenZ anybody? While Eastern Promises and A History of Violence are both fantastic I wish he would get back to some horror/scifi type stuff. At any rate I will still check this movie out.
I am a huge cronenberg fan, but I agree with you I like his earlier stuff like The Fly and HELLOOOO eXistenZ anybody? While Eastern Promises and A History of Violence are both fantastic I wish he would get back to some horror/scifi type stuff. At any rate I will still check this movie out.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+13
4:08PM on 05/30/2012

damn

looks fantastic based on the trailers, very trippy and cool. Still will check it out, hope I disagree with you! (again, heh...)
looks fantastic based on the trailers, very trippy and cool. Still will check it out, hope I disagree with you! (again, heh...)
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
-12
12:47PM on 05/30/2012

probably not for most

even rottentomatoes doenst seem to care for it too much and you know critics are familar with his work, so it probably is a bit talky and boring, which is OK , but then they casted a very boring lead person, who is not a good actor.
even rottentomatoes doenst seem to care for it too much and you know critics are familar with his work, so it probably is a bit talky and boring, which is OK , but then they casted a very boring lead person, who is not a good actor.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
12:02PM on 05/30/2012
Good review. I'm still eager to see it. Just a little more prepared now . . .
Good review. I'm still eager to see it. Just a little more prepared now . . .
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
5:45AM on 05/30/2012
The trailer threw me off a bit because I didn't know it was so futuristic. But there were some very cool moments and visuals. This review does not completely surprise me but the only thing I got from it is that everything was "dull".

I have absolutely no problem with talky movies (the half hour conversation immediately raised my interest) so I think there's still a pretty good chance that I'll enjoy the shit out of this film.
The trailer threw me off a bit because I didn't know it was so futuristic. But there were some very cool moments and visuals. This review does not completely surprise me but the only thing I got from it is that everything was "dull".

I have absolutely no problem with talky movies (the half hour conversation immediately raised my interest) so I think there's still a pretty good chance that I'll enjoy the shit out of this film.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
5:32AM on 05/30/2012

Guess 3rd time is the charm!

Short version(written a lenghty comment twice already) loved it personally, definitely not for everyone, most people at screening hated it or walked out. First screenplay Cronenberg wrote himself in 13 years! If you like Naked Lunch and Spider give this one a go.
Short version(written a lenghty comment twice already) loved it personally, definitely not for everyone, most people at screening hated it or walked out. First screenplay Cronenberg wrote himself in 13 years! If you like Naked Lunch and Spider give this one a go.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
5:30AM on 05/30/2012

I guess I'm not allowed to comment on this article.

Or is my third time the charm?
Or is my third time the charm?
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
5:26AM on 05/30/2012
Good review, I'm sure the Cronenberg faithful will be ripping your face off. Sometimes people miss the mark and instead of thinking they are entertaining you, they have gone and put you to sleep
Good review, I'm sure the Cronenberg faithful will be ripping your face off. Sometimes people miss the mark and instead of thinking they are entertaining you, they have gone and put you to sleep
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
2:00AM on 05/30/2012

Cronenberg maybe wanted that?

All I know is that Cronenberg, like Fincher, knows actors and brings the best out of them. I don't hate on Patterson like most do but I think Cronenberg wanted the role to be like that. I mean...its Cronenberg...the dude makes his actors do what he wants so maybe this is an arthouse film, who knows...but I'm sure the dullness is supposed to be there. Now I have to watch "A History Of Violence" again =)
All I know is that Cronenberg, like Fincher, knows actors and brings the best out of them. I don't hate on Patterson like most do but I think Cronenberg wanted the role to be like that. I mean...its Cronenberg...the dude makes his actors do what he wants so maybe this is an arthouse film, who knows...but I'm sure the dullness is supposed to be there. Now I have to watch "A History Of Violence" again =)
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting