Latest Entertainment News Headlines

Review: Pete's Dragon

Pete's Dragon
08.12.2016
100%
8 10

PLOT: An orphaned young boy discovers a dragon in the woods, which he quickly befriends. After some years pass, both are discovered by outsiders, and the friendship is tested as the boy is brought into civilization as the dragon is hunted by frightened townsfolk.

REVIEW: PETE'S DRAGON is a disarmingly effective movie. I hesitate to use the term "children's movie" because even though so many parts of it seem aimed at a younger audience, the film's melancholy atmosphere and abundance of life lessons make it worthy of any viewer. In fact, it may land a greater impact on the adults in the crowd, although surely everyone will be taken aback by the way it takes its fairly frivolous source material and morphs it into a surprisingly serious meditation on love, loss and the highs and lows of owning a pet.

This could have been a manic nightmare of goofy antics and silliness. Coming only a week after NINE LIVES, a movie that's tone deaf in the extreme and wouldn't know how to speak to an audience if its life depended on it, it's refreshing to see a film that takes its time to ponder the fantastical situation at the center of the action and dwell on it, as opposed to using it to create dopey sitcom moments in search of meager chuckles. Director David Lowery, who helmed the slow, thoughtful western AIN'T THEM BODIES SAINTS, was an unusual choice for the project, but it turns out he was the right one, as he brings an unexpected (but very welcome) gravitas to the plot at hand. There will be plenty of folks who wish PETE'S DRAGON weren't so darn earnest, but when the landscape is filled with dull, insipid programs created simply to hypnotize kids with garish action and loud noises, how nice is it to find someone taking a deliberate approach to the material as well as considering the characters' motives and hopes and prospects.

Plotwise, PETE'S DRAGON is simple and without pretension. Also bursting with relatable drama. In the opening sequence, young Pete (Oakes Fegley) survives a car crash that claims his parents, sending him scampering into the surrounding woods. On the verge of being attacked by wolves, Pete is rescued by a dragon - one long rumored to be living in them there woods - who he eventually calls Elliott (based on a character in Pete's favorite storybook). Six years pass as Pete and Elliott manage to survive in the forest, miraculously unseen, until one day the real world comes crashing in. The woods are being razed by a logging company, and Pete is discovered by Natalie (Oona Laurence), the daughter of the company's foreman, Jack (Wes Bentley). Pete is dragged unwillingly from his habitat and brought into the care of Jack and his ranger wife Grace (Bryce Dallas Howard), while Elliott is left stranded. Sad, but it gets worse. Elliott is eventually spotted by Jack's opportunistic brother Gavin (Karl Urban), who - once he's over his astonishment - figures capturing the creature is his ticket to the big time.

Lowery's film follows a pretty faithful E.T.-esque formula, as Pete and Elliott are torn away from each other heart-wrenchingly, reunited, then chased by stern adults who don't understand the magical friendship before them. Though Elliott is a big, goofy creature, Lowery approaches him and the material with tenderness and sincerity, making PETE'S DRAGON infinitely more effective than it would have been if it had followed the playbook of the original (which is an incredibly dated picture filled with forgettable songs. Sorry, but it's true.). There's a sequence early on where Elliott and Pete are chasing each other through the woods that is flat-out terrific, the dragon acting dog-like as it splashes around a stream. The rest of the film follows suit. Taking Elliott at face value and treating him like a genuine animal as opposed to making him a cartoony fool provides dividends, as you find yourself actually caring for this beast and hoping the best for him and his friend.

The human performances strike just the right notes. I haven't yet mentioned Robert Redford as a wise old guy who spins yarns about the fabled dragon - only to eventually come to the creature's aid - but his presence is just so terrific here. Howard is sweet and gentle as Pete's surrogate mother, and youngsters Oakes Fegley and Oona Laurence are natural and completely believable. Playing the requisite jerk, Urban nails it, and even gives the character a glimmer of likability that keeps him from being completely hiss-worthy. But it's all about Elliott, really, and he's an excellent creation; sweet and kind and terrifically realized while still clearly a visual effect (that's not a complaint; it helps that he's not 100% convincing). Like the rest of the film, Elliott was obviously created with love, and I dare you not to want to claim him for yourself.

Source: JoBlo.com

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

1:35AM on 08/14/2016

A Return to Form for Disney

Just saw this on a whim, wanted to see something this weekend and Suicide Squad had left such a bad taste in my mouth that I needed something good. Thought about catching Star Trek for a fourth time, but instead gave this a try, based on this review (I only read the score before I went, read the full review afterwards). This movie was a magnificent surprise, a truly wonderful movie for kids and adults alike. And dare I say a return to form for Disney, who, outside of their franchise sectors
Just saw this on a whim, wanted to see something this weekend and Suicide Squad had left such a bad taste in my mouth that I needed something good. Thought about catching Star Trek for a fourth time, but instead gave this a try, based on this review (I only read the score before I went, read the full review afterwards). This movie was a magnificent surprise, a truly wonderful movie for kids and adults alike. And dare I say a return to form for Disney, who, outside of their franchise sectors (Marvel, Lucasfilm, Pixar), seems to have struggled over the past few years to really make a great movie with that true Disney heart. What I saw from this, and from Jungle Book earlier this year, really give me high hopes that Disney will handle their upcoming non-franchise films perfectly.

So surprised that Disney hasn't really seemed to market this movie, though.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
4:26PM on 08/12/2016

WOW

I was not expecting this at all. I was expecting a terrible review the teaser made it seem awesome but then the real trailer came out and it was just very blah to me. I'm happy to see that I was wrong I will check out for sure.
I was not expecting this at all. I was expecting a terrible review the teaser made it seem awesome but then the real trailer came out and it was just very blah to me. I'm happy to see that I was wrong I will check out for sure.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
3:56PM on 08/12/2016

Great Review

Seriously, that was a very well written review. I will be seeing this one in the theater. I couldn't tell if this would be goofy like the first movie or more earnest like Where the Wild Things Are. Happy its the latter.
Seriously, that was a very well written review. I will be seeing this one in the theater. I couldn't tell if this would be goofy like the first movie or more earnest like Where the Wild Things Are. Happy its the latter.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:12PM on 08/12/2016
looking forward to this however they better not kill the fuckin dragon or no ticket for me ....thats what ruined king kong.
looking forward to this however they better not kill the fuckin dragon or no ticket for me ....thats what ruined king kong.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
3:27PM on 08/12/2016
...you have zero knowledge of how the movie industry works, do you? I mean of course they don't kill the dragon, how will they make the next 10 stupid sequels? They HAD to "kill" Kong because it was a remake of the original King Kong movie where Kong Died...
...you have zero knowledge of how the movie industry works, do you? I mean of course they don't kill the dragon, how will they make the next 10 stupid sequels? They HAD to "kill" Kong because it was a remake of the original King Kong movie where Kong Died...
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting

Movie Hottie Of The Week

More