PLOT: A group of daredevil thieves (Idris Elba, Michael Ealy, Chris Brown, Paul Walker, and Hayden Christensen) are pushed into a dangerous armored car robbery by a recently paroled ex-colleague (T.I), while simultaneously being hunted by a dogged cop (Matt Dillon), and his partner (Jay Hernandez).
REVIEW: The biggest (unintentional) laugh I got out while watching the sneak preview of TAKERS the other night came during the closing credits, when no less than four writers were listed as having worked on the screenplay. This includes director John Luessenhop. The reason I found the number of writers so funny was that apparently it took four guys just to write a film thats essentially an MTV CRIBS version of HEAT, with a little ITALIAN JOB (remake) mixed in.
Michael Mann should sue the makers of TAKERS (hey, that rhymes). Its incredible how blatantly they ripped-off HEAT. From the Cops n Robbers plot, having Matt Dillon stand-in for Al Pacino, and Idris Elba for De Niro, to the big action set-piece set in a crowded L.A street, to the climatic shoot-out at an airfield, theres nothing in TAKERS that wasnt stolen from Mann. Heck, Luessenhop even tries to ape his visual style, with lots of high-end DV, and hand-held camera work. The only way it could be more obvious would be if some Brian Eno, or Moby was used on the soundtrack, instead of a hilariously melodramatic and unoriginal score by Paul Haslinger (coincidentally, a former member of Tangerine Dream- which was Manns go-to group during his THIEF/THE KEEP days).
Being a huge fan of Michael Mann (HEATs easily in my top 20 all-time best movie list); I found it impossible to take TAKERS seriously; as I knew there wasnt a shred of originality in it. However, even if I had never seen HEAT, I probably would have still hated TAKERS. Director Luessenhop, while stealing much from Mann, obviously wasnt able to figure out how Mann managed to stage a good action sequence. TAKERS has a few big action set pieces, and some of them would actually be pretty decent if they werent so terribly shot and edited. Theres a big Parkour inspired foot chase involving Chris Brown and Matt Dillon that might have been effective, but is so clumsily shot that its impossible to make out whos chasing who.
In all fairness to Luessenhop, I think hes handicapped a bit by the PG-13 rating, and nowhere is this more evident than the big hotel shootout. Apparently the MPAA has set a limit on how loud gunshots can be in a PG-13 film, so during this lengthy shootout, all of the sound FX have been excised, and replaced by bass notes on the soundtrack. Instead of being exciting, the whole sequence comes off as silly.
This sequence in particular suggests that TAKERS is yet another film thats been cut to ribbons by the studio distributing it. It was shot way back in 2008, a point thats driven home by T.Is character, who was busted in 2004 and complains about having spent four years in the joint. Its sat on the shelf for AT LEAST eighteen months, and was once hilariously titled BONE DEEP, until sanity prevailed.
The one thing TAKERS sort-of has going for it is the cast, but even thats a mixed bag. On the plus side, weve got Idris Elba and Matt Dillon. Elbas a ridiculously talented guy who killed on THE WIRE for five seasons. In films he still hasnt found his niche, but I have faith that at some point hes going to establish himself as a top-shelf talent. While the film is unfocused, he has a few decent moments, especially in a subplot involving his crack-addicted sister, whos just ditched rehab and is proving herself to be a big liability to Elbas big score. As for Dillon- it must be said that the guys somewhat squandered the momentum he had going after his Oscar nomination for CRASH in films like ARMORED, or YOU, ME & DUPREE. However, hes still not a bad actor, as hes effective in the cop role, even if its riddled with all the standard clichés (young, inexperienced partner, mean ex-wife, problems with internal affairs, etc.).
Unfortunately, the rest of the B-list cast cant measure up to Elba and Dillon. Michael Ealys not bad in his thinly written role, but Chris Brown (whose thuggish, girlfriend beating episode is likely one of the reasons TAKERS sat of the shelf for so long) is incredibly amateurish is the younger, hot-head of the group. Hes even out-acted by another musician, rapper T.I, who plays the villain, although his narration-style dialogue (oh daaaaamn, hes jackin the truck!!!) during the big heist sequence adds yet another unintentional laugh to the film.
Brown aside, the worst actor award here has to go to Hayden Christensen. A little tough-guy swagger (his efforts at speaking street makes him sound more like Turtle from ENTOURAGE than anything else), a pork-pie hat, and a bunch of tats arent nearly enough to make him believable as a badass. Paul Walker, a bland pretty boy in his own right with a nothing role, comes off like Steve McQueen compared to Christensen. As for Zoe Saldana, whos prominently featured in the ads, well, lets just say its obvious this was shot before STAR TREK, and long before AVATAR came out, as theres no way shed ever pop up in a B-flick like this after her recent success. Here, she gets two quick scenes as the sexy girlfriend before being written-off.
I guess I shouldnt be surprised TAKERS is as bad as it is considering its being dumped in the dreaded last weekend in August (or as I call it weekend of the damned). TAKERS is a film that totally deserves this terrible release date, as its completely devoid of originality, and reeks of hack-filmmaking at its worse. As I stated earlier- Michael Mann should sue!
CLICK IMAGE TO OPEN GALLERY & SEE MORE PICS...