The gender-fuelled motivation behind Disney changing Rapunzel to Tangled | Movie News

The gender-fuelled motivation behind Disney changing Rapunzel to Tangled
Comments: 14
terometer
50%
Strike Back below!
by: Paul Tassi Mar. 9, 2010

There's usually pretty clear motivation behind a title change of a major movie. Usually it's something about testing or vulgarity (in Kevin Smith's case), but the reasoning behind Disney's latest move to change the name of their upcoming animated feature RAPUNZEL to TANGLED is a bit more interesting.

The LA Times has a story about the logic behind the decision, and the fundamental reason? To attract more boys.

"The makeover of "Rapunzel" is more than cosmetic. Disney can ill afford a moniker that alienates half the potential audience, young boys, who are needed to make an expensive family film a success. "We did not want to be put in a box," said Ed Catmull, president of Pixar and Disney Animation Studios, explaining the reason for the name change.

"Some people might assume it's a fairy tale for girls when it's not. We make movies to be appreciated and loved by everybody."

Credit the underwhelming performance of THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG for this newfound change of policy.

"The Princess and the Frog" generated considerably less -- $222 million in global ticket sales to date. "Based upon the response from fans and critics, we believe it would have been higher if it wasn't prejudged by its title," Catmull said.

Let’s see, BEAUTY AND THE BEAST, THE LITTLE MERMAID, SNOW WHITE, MULAN and POCAHONTAS all had something female-ish in their titles, so I think this rationale is kind of a cop out if you ask me. Has Disney animation just lost their luster in favor of Pixar?

A good movie is a good movie. Pixar could name their next project LADY FRILLY PINK PANTS and if it was well done, it would still be a smashing success like all their other films. I think Disney’s just making excuses here.

Source: LA Times

Add to MFC Profile

Extra Tidbit: Floyd Norman, a retired Disney and Pixar animator, drew that picture making fun of the new name which he calls “beyond stupid.”

14 discussions Expand all
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
Ocelot_Snake
4:30AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Moronic logic
Moronic logic
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
kurofusen
7:47PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Meh... I can see both sides here, but I don't think a good movie alone will make it a smash hit. A good movie with good broad based marketing does a smash hit make. The name might come second, but to some (who i'd probably never see a movie with) it still means everything.
Meh... I can see both sides here, but I don't think a good movie alone will make it a smash hit. A good movie with good broad based marketing does a smash hit make. The name might come second, but to some (who i'd probably never see a movie with) it still means everything.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
brewsky99
7:40PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
So what does Disney think Kids are idiots,will it makes sense they think adults are.
So what does Disney think Kids are idiots,will it makes sense they think adults are.
 
+2
Vote Up Vote Down
Brer B8a
7:40PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I see Disney's point of view here but the title Rapunzel doesn't sound that girly. I remember being a young lad and being ashamed to admit I liked Beauty and the Beast because I thought of it as a girly movie. That is just how young boys think. If it makes them more money then so be it. They are a business and they need to do what businesses set out to do, and that is make money.
I see Disney's point of view here but the title Rapunzel doesn't sound that girly. I remember being a young lad and being ashamed to admit I liked Beauty and the Beast because I thought of it as a girly movie. That is just how young boys think. If it makes them more money then so be it. They are a business and they need to do what businesses set out to do, and that is make money.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
RiverStyx
7:10PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I think this article is spot on. I really enjoyed Princess and the Frog and am sad that the lack of $$ has ruined the chance of ever having another classic fairytale animation movie. Rapunzel is my favorite fairytale and I was looking forward to this until now. The reality is that boys will not want to see this movie regardless of the title so they're just kidding themselves that this is...
I think this article is spot on. I really enjoyed Princess and the Frog and am sad that the lack of $$ has ruined the chance of ever having another classic fairytale animation movie. Rapunzel is my favorite fairytale and I was looking forward to this until now. The reality is that boys will not want to see this movie regardless of the title so they're just kidding themselves that this is actually going to boost their sales.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
HedwigX
5:42PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Hm
Poo-poo it all you like, but a lot of people I know have childishly refused to see the rather excellent Princess and the Frog cos "it's a girl's film".
Poo-poo it all you like, but a lot of people I know have childishly refused to see the rather excellent Princess and the Frog cos "it's a girl's film".
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
matt101
4:59PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Lion King is the highest grossing worldwide boxoffice for a Disney film (not including Pixar). That title BLOWS away the princess films total box office, so they might not be so crazy.
Lion King is the highest grossing worldwide boxoffice for a Disney film (not including Pixar). That title BLOWS away the princess films total box office, so they might not be so crazy.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
Terminal_83
4:17PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
This is a pretty hilarious little fiasco. I wonder if this will pay off in the long run.
This is a pretty hilarious little fiasco. I wonder if this will pay off in the long run.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
kdraines
3:07PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
blank
blank
blank
 
+2
Vote Up Vote Down
kdraines
3:03PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
blank
blank
blank
 
+3
Vote Up Vote Down
BHak88
2:39PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
"We make movies to be loved by everybody". Translation: we want to make as much money as we possibly can, and if that means tricking boys into seeing achick flick, so be it.
"We make movies to be loved by everybody". Translation: we want to make as much money as we possibly can, and if that means tricking boys into seeing achick flick, so be it.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
Miguelito
2:29PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Rapunzel's Rapunzel's Rapunzel. Plain and simple. It's not like a big green ogre is going to be making a deal with Rumpelstiltskin or anything. The broad gets rescued by a prince. And this is Pixar remember. $100 million is not a failure (the princess and frog). Disney needs to stop worrying so much about sequels to pixar films and hire elton john and time rice to score a new 2d animated...
Rapunzel's Rapunzel's Rapunzel. Plain and simple. It's not like a big green ogre is going to be making a deal with Rumpelstiltskin or anything. The broad gets rescued by a prince. And this is Pixar remember. $100 million is not a failure (the princess and frog). Disney needs to stop worrying so much about sequels to pixar films and hire elton john and time rice to score a new 2d animated epic. come the f*** on
1 Reply
 
kdraines
3:05PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
blank
blank
blank
 
+13
Vote Up Vote Down
The Bodyguard
12:54PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I can kind of see their point of view considering how much has changed since those movies came out to todays youth. I can identify with past generations, I mean I am not that old anyhow. But today's kids are dumb and should be treated as such.
I can kind of see their point of view considering how much has changed since those movies came out to todays youth. I can identify with past generations, I mean I am not that old anyhow. But today's kids are dumb and should be treated as such.