Latest Entertainment News Headlines

The UnPopular Opinion: Total Recall (2012)

10.20.2016

THE UNPOPULAR OPINION is an ongoing column featuring different takes on films that either the writer HATED, but that the majority of film fans LOVED, or that the writer LOVED, but that most others LOATHED. We're hoping this column will promote constructive and geek fueled discussion. Enjoy!

****SOME SPOILERS ENSUE****

Remakes are one of the most thankless projects in Hollywood. Everyone involved with the production of a film that tells a story that has already been told have to prepare themselves for an onslaught of hate and vitriol from those who love the original version of the movie. We have seen this trend reach a boiling point in recent years but the idea of a remake is nothing new to Hollywood. Hell, stage plays are recreated with new set design, cast, and writing almost annually and no one bats an eye. Why should films be any different? 1990's TOTAL RECALL is one of the most beloved action films of that decade. While the special effects may not all have aged as well as others, Paul Verhoeven's violent, sexy, and very funny film has stood the test of time because it manages to blend a sense of pulpy science fiction and balls out insanity in a unique film setting. So, of course, any remake is going to get shit on the moment it is announced. But, 2012's TOTAL RECALL is a superior film in almost every way to the Arnold Schwarzenegger version. That doesn't mean you have to throw the original away, but you can allow the two films to stand side by side without criticism.

Before we go any further, yes I am aware that the remake was directed by Len Wiseman. Yes, I am aware that it lacks the levity of the 1990 film. Yes, I am aware of all of the differences between the two films. But, nostalgia is not the only criteria for whether a remake is a good movie. Films must be judged on their own merits. While I am not advocating that anyone disregard the original film, that cannot solely be your point of contention with a new take on the same material. I believe that if the 1990 TOTAL RECALL had never been made there would have been an astoundingly more positive reception for the 2012 film. Wiseman has often proven himself to be able to film good action sequences, they just happen to exist within movies that are a bit lacking in other regards. This TOTAL RECALL may not have the same witty one-liners or buckets of gore but that is because this is a film made in a different era and with different goals in mind. My biggest complaint with this film is that it lacks enough depth the source material deserves, but that applies to both versions of the film.

The UnPopular Opinion, Total Recall, Colin Farrell, Bryan Cranston, Kate Beckinsale, Jessica Biel, Bill Nighy, Science Fiction, Remake, Arnold Schwarzenegger

Each of the two TOTAL RECALLs have their own merits. Where the 1990 film was full to the brim with multi-dimensional characters, the remake doesn't flesh everyone out in quite the same way. Still, the new version of the movie spends a lot more energy on action and plot, weaving expansive fights and chase sequences between a twisting narrative that is heads and tails more engaging than the first movie. TOTAL RECALL 1990 is very much "Schwarzenegger on Mars" rather than a tale about espionage and unreliable memories. TOTAL RECALL 2012 delivers on adapting Philip K. Dick's short story into a modern parable much in the same was that Steven Spielberg did with MINORITY REPORT. Both that film and this remake examine a cultural and societal air of suspicion and surveillance through the eyes of one character deeply embedded in the broken system he is systematically taking apart with his actions. Because the themes are darker and more brooding, this TOTAL RECALL is not as light or fun as the original but that is by design.

Then there is the cast. Any time you name an actor stepping into a role previously played by Arnold Schwarzenegger, you are likely going to have a trade off. Where Arnold was the muscular quip-spewing machine, Colin Farrell is a superior actor who brings some depth to his character that is only limited by the screenplay itself. Instead of Ronnie Cox and Michael Ironside as your villains, we instead have the always great Bryan Cranston and Bokeem Woodbine as your bad guys. They may not be mustache-twirling black hats like Ironside and Cox, but there is more to these characters than just yelling and slicked back hair. Even Kate Beckinsale is a massive upgrade compared to Sharon Stone. Both women are unbelievably sexy, but the fact that Len Wiseman is married to Beckinsale means her character gets a significant boost in screen time here. If I have one casting complaint, it is Jessica Biel who fails to deliver as Melina. In the original Rachel Ticotin never was attractive enough to compare with Sharon Stone, but her character was stronger and more demure which served as a contrast between the two women. Here, Biel and Beckinsale are so damn good looking that you sometimes fail to accept her as a freedom fighter.

The UnPopular Opinion, Total Recall, Colin Farrell, Bryan Cranston, Kate Beckinsale, Jessica Biel, Bill Nighy, Science Fiction, Remake, Arnold Schwarzenegger

What really makes TOTAL RECALL stand out from the recent trend in science fiction is that while it does try to examine a deeper set of issues and themes, it doesn't bludgeon you with a political stance. Yes, the entire concept of this TOTAL RECALL is about a brewing civil war between the haves and the have-nots in this dystopian world, but it treats them the way STAR WARS treated The Empire and The Rebellion. These groups exist and are facing off against one another but that takes a back seat to the set-pieces. There is a lot of CGI in this movie but it never feels as artificial as similar films in the last decade. TOTAL RECALL has a tangible feel to it despite the computer generated imagery and truly inhabits this fictional world. I would have loved to see the story return to Mars, but it was a very smart decision to set this film in a wholly different geography to further distance itself from comparisons to the first movie.

TOTAL RECALL relies heavily on fictional science which means that there is no use trying to apply logic or physics to the world on screen. Again, suspension of disbelief is key when you watch films like this in order to truly appreciate the experience of the movie. But, the new TOTAL RECALL far exceeds the gadgets and technology we saw in the first movie even if the setting is more mundane. This total recall feels more like BLADE RUNNER than ROBOCOP. Len Wiseman manages to evoke classic films rather than the original version of TOTAL RECALL which is a testament to this movie being able to stand on it's own. There are a lot of things I wanted to see in this TOTAL RECALL that I did not get but that is the pitfalls of expectation. This TOTAL RECALL would be worthy of a sequel to further experience the world it built and maybe draw some more parallels with the 1990 film. There is no reason now that the movie couldn't go to Mars, right?

The UnPopular Opinion, Total Recall, Colin Farrell, Bryan Cranston, Kate Beckinsale, Jessica Biel, Bill Nighy, Science Fiction, Remake, Arnold Schwarzenegger

For a film about unreliable memory, TOTAL RECALL deserves to be remembered. It serves as exactly what it was designed to be: summer popcorn entertainment. I do feel that this version of the film is a step above in the visual quality of the 1990 film even if it doesn't work quite as well as Paul Verhoeven's movie. If I had to choose between the two movies, I would likely opt to go with the Arnold Schwarzenegger film, but I would have no qualms about rewatching the 2012 version when looking for a good flick on a regular evening. It is fast, slick, and well acted and is different enough from the original that it is more than capable of standing on it's own as a film and a movie experience. The goal of TOTAL RECALL as a story is to have you question reality and your perception of the past and both movies do that very well. What this version of TOTAL RECALL does better is give you a roller coaster on which to experience those themes. It may not be as funny as the classic take on the tale but this TOTAL RECALL is more than worthy enough to share that title.

Oh, and if you have any suggestions for The UnPopular Opinion I’m always happy to hear them. You can send along an email to alexmaidy@joblo.com, spell it out below, slap it up on my wall in Movie Fan Central, or send me a private message via Movie Fan Central. Provide me with as many movie suggestions as you like, with any reasoning you'd care to share, and if I agree then you may one day see it featured in this very column!

CLICK IMAGE TO OPEN GALLERY & SEE MORE PICS...

Source: JoBlo.com

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

12:41AM on 10/21/2016
I'm with you that Beckinsale is better than Stone, and Ticotin would still kick Jessica Biel's ass in a Melina-off. But frankly, other than Beckinsale doing double duty by also playing the Richter role (in what's arguably the biggest diversion from the original movie), it feels like a blow-by-blow of the other film without Mars. Oh, and Bill Nighy is in this. And I challenge anyone to say that he's memorable. In all, the acting is actually pretty spectacular (except, again, Biel), but I don't
I'm with you that Beckinsale is better than Stone, and Ticotin would still kick Jessica Biel's ass in a Melina-off. But frankly, other than Beckinsale doing double duty by also playing the Richter role (in what's arguably the biggest diversion from the original movie), it feels like a blow-by-blow of the other film without Mars. Oh, and Bill Nighy is in this. And I challenge anyone to say that he's memorable. In all, the acting is actually pretty spectacular (except, again, Biel), but I don't care for Len Wiseman's style at all. Like the Robocop remake, it's a fine film, but not at all memorable.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
-1
11:27PM on 10/20/2016

Nope

The key difference is the original can be watched over and over. This one was difficult to watch just once. Farrel is one note with his acting. This was his Minority Report persona again. That's two shit "remakes" for him now, the other being the abomination Fright Night.
The key difference is the original can be watched over and over. This one was difficult to watch just once. Farrel is one note with his acting. This was his Minority Report persona again. That's two shit "remakes" for him now, the other being the abomination Fright Night.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
6:23PM on 10/20/2016
This movie wasn't exactly bad, just very forgettable. The tone, style, and design of the first one is what made it a classic, including the great score by Jerry Goldsmith. None of those aspects in the new film come close to the original. Farrell is a good actor, but only when the material is good. I think he's best in comedic, tragic, or villainous roles, but boring as a leading man action hero (look at SWAT and The Recruit). Arnold has a unique presence in film that can't be replicated. Like a
This movie wasn't exactly bad, just very forgettable. The tone, style, and design of the first one is what made it a classic, including the great score by Jerry Goldsmith. None of those aspects in the new film come close to the original. Farrell is a good actor, but only when the material is good. I think he's best in comedic, tragic, or villainous roles, but boring as a leading man action hero (look at SWAT and The Recruit). Arnold has a unique presence in film that can't be replicated. Like a lot of other remakes of the 2000's, this one has already be forgotten, as it should be.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
5:32PM on 10/20/2016

You mean Ronny Cox?

Not that he's a household name or anything, but surely you could get the name right. That said, I suppose I agree that if it were a different title, this would have been another passable sci-fi romp.
Not that he's a household name or anything, but surely you could get the name right. That said, I suppose I agree that if it were a different title, this would have been another passable sci-fi romp.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
5:11PM on 10/20/2016

Totally agree

Slap another title on this movie and it would have been received better, and done much better business.
Slap another title on this movie and it would have been received better, and done much better business.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
3:57PM on 10/20/2016
One quibble, when you say Colin Ferrell is superior to Arnold as an actor in every way. That is very subjective. They are both damned good actors and Arnold doesn't get the credit he deserves.
One quibble, when you say Colin Ferrell is superior to Arnold as an actor in every way. That is very subjective. They are both damned good actors and Arnold doesn't get the credit he deserves.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
3:55PM on 10/20/2016
I find myself agreeing with this unpopular opinion, mostly. The original is one of my favorites, I had a lot of fun with it. The remake isn't fun, it is compelling and thoughtful. Different takes on the source material. The new one is very good. But the original film is very re-watchable.
I find myself agreeing with this unpopular opinion, mostly. The original is one of my favorites, I had a lot of fun with it. The remake isn't fun, it is compelling and thoughtful. Different takes on the source material. The new one is very good. But the original film is very re-watchable.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+0
3:36PM on 10/20/2016
It was not THAT bad but the remake suffers from the same problems all movies by Len Wiseman do - being totally bland and forgetable eye candy. Great design and look but one dimensional characters and a weak script.
It was not THAT bad but the remake suffers from the same problems all movies by Len Wiseman do - being totally bland and forgetable eye candy. Great design and look but one dimensional characters and a weak script.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
2:50PM on 10/20/2016

I liked it.

I guess I'm one of the few. Of course, anything with Kate in it is worth a watch. :)
I guess I'm one of the few. Of course, anything with Kate in it is worth a watch. :)
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
2:37PM on 10/20/2016

Seriously Stop This Segment!!!!

"But, 2012's TOTAL RECALL is a superior film in almost every way to the Arnold Schwarzenegger version."
Ok at this point I'm convinced Alex Maidy is doing these articles just to troll people. The statement I just quoted above is about as ridiculous as it gets. I straight up fell asleep watching this movie and I NEVER fall asleep in movies. Also: "Before we go any further, yes I am aware that the remake was directed by Len Wiseman. Yes, I am aware that it lacks the levity of the 1990 film.
"But, 2012's TOTAL RECALL is a superior film in almost every way to the Arnold Schwarzenegger version."
Ok at this point I'm convinced Alex Maidy is doing these articles just to troll people. The statement I just quoted above is about as ridiculous as it gets. I straight up fell asleep watching this movie and I NEVER fall asleep in movies. Also: "Before we go any further, yes I am aware that the remake was directed by Len Wiseman. Yes, I am aware that it lacks the levity of the 1990 film. Yes, I am aware of all of the differences between the two films."
So basically you've undermined your entire argument. These posts have become nothing but click bait articles designed to get a rise out of people.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
2:00PM on 10/20/2016

Ronny Cox

Not "Robbie Cox"

The problem with the new Total Recall is that it's almost entirely forgettable. Mentioning Minority Report in the writeup just emphasizes that. Doesn't mean it's a bad movie, but it's ultimately disposable.
Not "Robbie Cox"

The problem with the new Total Recall is that it's almost entirely forgettable. Mentioning Minority Report in the writeup just emphasizes that. Doesn't mean it's a bad movie, but it's ultimately disposable.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+0
1:37PM on 10/20/2016
I cannot remember anything about this film, I cannot even hate it...

Don't remember the plot, any specific scene, a one liner... nothing!

And that is always a clear sign of a movie gone bad.
I cannot remember anything about this film, I cannot even hate it...

Don't remember the plot, any specific scene, a one liner... nothing!

And that is always a clear sign of a movie gone bad.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
12:44PM on 10/20/2016

Solid analysis

As far as remakes go this is one of the few that I actually enjoyed. It took the basic idea and did its own thing with it instead of being a carbon copy of the original. Plus its closer to the source material than the Arnold version. That being said i still prefer the Arnold version mainly because im a child of the 80's.
As far as remakes go this is one of the few that I actually enjoyed. It took the basic idea and did its own thing with it instead of being a carbon copy of the original. Plus its closer to the source material than the Arnold version. That being said i still prefer the Arnold version mainly because im a child of the 80's.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
-1
11:22AM on 10/20/2016
The production design in this TOTAL RECALL is a total rip-off (see what I did there?) of STAR WARS. Len Wiseman does a very good job. The action sequences are thrilling and they give the movie the right pacing. Well, only half of it. It's not his fault; it's the script's. Hawlfway through, it becomes monotonous and you start to wish for something more in the story. Can you believe that I thought that Len was going to do a bad job because of his other movies? The opposite happened with the
The production design in this TOTAL RECALL is a total rip-off (see what I did there?) of STAR WARS. Len Wiseman does a very good job. The action sequences are thrilling and they give the movie the right pacing. Well, only half of it. It's not his fault; it's the script's. Hawlfway through, it becomes monotonous and you start to wish for something more in the story. Can you believe that I thought that Len was going to do a bad job because of his other movies? The opposite happened with the actors. In general, they're more talented than the original's cast. Unfortunately, Colin Farrell has nothing to do other than look like the audience of TODDLERS & TIARAS (shocked and confused). I blame the removal of Mars. Not the actual scenes in the planet, though. In the original, it all started because DOUG QUAID had a dream... and he fulfills it. Here's just bored of the everyday routine. At the end, there's no sense of "My life changed for the better". So, he's a boring character... and so is MELINA. Kate Beckinsale gets the chance to be a badass. The main thing this one does to ruin the original (which was already a highly-flawed film for other reasons) is remove the question of whether it's all real... even though it's in the poster. It's alluded but, when the movie ends, you don't debate about it.

-3/10: Both versions of TOTAL RECALL.
-5/10: ROBOCOP.
-5.7/10: STAR WARS franchise.
-6/10: BLADE RUNNER.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting