Watchmen: Your Review? | Movie News

Not since THE DARK KNIGHT have I seen fanboys whipped up into such a frenzy over a movie. Of course TDK Fever was only a few months ago but the next big geek fantasy is on the big screen starting today. Perhaps you're one of the lucky ones who saw an advanced screening or waited in line to see one of last night's midnight screenings. Maybe you're leaving in a few minutes to check it out. No matter what you're level of WATCHMEN love, we've had lots of coverage over the past couple months. I feel a flashback coming on....

New about Aronofsky leaving WATCHMEN to direct THE FOUNTAIN
A 2005 Comix-to-Flix column evaluating whether WATCHMEN can ever be made
Dr. Manhattan concept art from the Paul Greengrass era
Our first article mentioning Zack Snyder as a possibility to direct WATCHMEN
Exclusive JoBlo.com WATCHMEN video journal
Our visit to the Vancouver set of WATCHMEN
The first and second trailers for WATCHMEN
Our wrap-up of the WATCHMEN Comic-Con panel and our Con interviews with the cast
Our exclusive video interviews with Zack Snyder, Malin Akerman, Carla Gugino, Patrick Wilson, Billy Crudup, Matthew Goode, Jackie Early Haley and Jeffrey Dean Morgan
Super WATCHMEN fangirl Jenna Busch reviews the film
Whew! That's a lot of WATCHMEN coverage. As you might expect, we're all a little exhausted from covering this film for the past six years or so. Now it's your turn. The Strike Backs will be left wide open for you to post your own review of the film and discuss WATCHMEN with your fellow schmoes. Now if you'll excuse me, this Silk Spectre I and II slash fiction isn't going to write itself...

Source: JoBlo.com
Most Popular Movie News




















































































6:00AM on 03/10/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
now thats been said i would like to offer u an apology for my childish reaction, and i would like to thank you for wishing me the best for the rest of my life, being a mindless drone is a lot harder than people think, u just drone on and on and on all day long until some snotty smalled faced twat (that picture does amuse me) comes along and says something thats just anoys you! .......hey dont get me wrong its not a bad life, but just sometimes i wish i could change!
5:33PM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:36PM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I've talked to a bunch of people today who saw the film but didn't read the novel and say they didn't like the movie. I get that. It really was a movie for fans of the novel.
The changed ending was perfect,...
I've talked to a bunch of people today who saw the film but didn't read the novel and say they didn't like the movie. I get that. It really was a movie for fans of the novel.
The changed ending was perfect, it actually made way more sense...not that I didn't love the giant squid but it did make me laugh out loud when I first read the book.
Most of the performances were AMAZING, as were the VFX and cinematography. Great sound track and sound design as well.
Malin Ackerman's performance was dry...yeah yeah dry character, not much to work with...she isn't a good actress...admit it already. All these people defending her performance are probably the same people that cried when Dark Knight didn't get a Best Picture oscar nom. detach yourselves from your fantasy land and recognize the difference between GOOD and BAD.
Some of the fight sequences were unnecessarily dragged out and the sex scene between Night Owl and Silk II was retarded. I've seen better soft core on Baby Blue II.
IMHO.
1:49PM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:37AM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:19AM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:06AM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
oh one more...
oh one more thing.......a note to "natdizzle" it IS a matter of opinion, and everyone is entitled to one! not just u fucko!
5:03AM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:40AM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:32AM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
2:43AM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Well...
Well I'm glad I dont live in that alternate reality. In THIS reality Zack Snyder should be praised for what he has done. The trouble is if you make films in this day and age, You're damned if you do and damned if you dont. I mean If the guy made it exactly as the GN (word for word, Pic by pic) he ends up with a meat cleaver to the brain. If he strays from the GN and comes up with something completely different then, again the meat cleaver.
"Too much blue dick, Not enough, Dick too short, Dick too long,Movie Too long, Not long enough, Blah Blah fucking BLAH.
What does a guy have to do to please everyone. I went to see it last night with a mate of mine and I new a little bit about it witch I think helped me, I enjoyed it, I was entertained for 160 minutes, Longer if you include the trailers hehe. I think hollywood has turned the majority of us into a pack of bloody whiners and complainers. People need to take a step back and take a look at the BIG picture and thank the film industry for even trying to put these stories on the big screen for us, I mean I go to the movies/ watch dvds to escape the shit thats going on in my own life and last night was 160 mins that I had not a care in the world... Longer if you include trailers hehehe.
I know I'll be seeing it again, There was soo much to take in that I have to and want to.
Rorshach was Incredible, I take my hat off to him.
My xtra tidbit- Did anyone notice the nod to 300 at the beginning when the comedian throws the coffee cup and it hits the numbers on the door to the apartment.
12:28AM on 03/09/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:41PM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:09PM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
9:44PM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
9:09PM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
7:47PM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:02PM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Looking forward to the Director's cut!
Looking forward to the Director's cut!
4:14PM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
2:46PM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
The movie was faithful, easy to follow and visually stunning. It's not perfect but it's far from a failure.
The movie was faithful, easy to follow and visually stunning. It's not perfect but it's far from a failure.
1:27PM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Just be fucking happy, stop whining :)
11:20AM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:45AM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I understand some of the negative reviews of the movie, but to say that "Watchmen" was a failure is somewhat absurd. It's just a damn hard book to adapt and from what I saw, Zach did a good job at capturing it.
I give the movie an 8.5; maybe a 9. It's a well done movie. The pacing is off, but that's due to the narrative of the book.
I understand some of the negative reviews of the movie, but to say that "Watchmen" was a failure is somewhat absurd. It's just a damn hard book to adapt and from what I saw, Zach did a good job at capturing it.
I give the movie an 8.5; maybe a 9. It's a well done movie. The pacing is off, but that's due to the narrative of the book.
4:19AM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I loved the film. Just saw it for a second time, and brought the wife. She hasn't read the graphic novel but...
I loved the film. Just saw it for a second time, and brought the wife. She hasn't read the graphic novel but she loved the movie! That's really saying something because its hard to make a 3-hour adaptation of a 400-page, extremely dense comic book enjoyable to those unfamiliar with the source.
I thought the sex scenes were appropriate and intimate. Snyder may be the only director who knows how to use sex. In 300, the sex scene showed how much Leonidas loved his wife and how passionate and equal they were. In WATCHMEN, the sex scene on Archie lacked grace and depth for a reason...to show that it was done only out of thrill and adrenaline-filled excitement. Of course, there were way too many 15 year old boys in the theater laughing loudly EVERY time someone was naked on screen. "Boobs! Penis! Hahahaha!!!!" Seriously?
One complaint: Why did Snyder make Rorschach so violent? In the book, he chains the girl-killer guy up, gives him a saw, lights the house on fire and walks away. I guess Snyder thought audiences would think it was too much like SAW...still, cleaving the guy's skull? I love violence in films if it is important to the story, but this was grossly excessive and unnecessary to his character. Bad form...
Otherwise, amazing film. Can't wait for the extended cut.
3:17AM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Overall WAIT FOR THIS TO COME TO DVD!!
Overall WAIT FOR THIS TO COME TO DVD!!
1:21AM on 03/08/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Moby Dick is considered the greatest american novel of all time. It has been adapted several times to film. The book is a subtle tale about god, man and mans passion. Everything in the book represents something and every character plays a role in the...
Moby Dick is considered the greatest american novel of all time. It has been adapted several times to film. The book is a subtle tale about god, man and mans passion. Everything in the book represents something and every character plays a role in the devine tale in a subtle way. The film was a literal adaptation where they just go out and kill a whale. For any film maker, it is imposibe to translate the authors intent to screen. Its imposibe. You can make an okay action movie but nothing compared to the novel.
The same thing is true for the Watchmen. The Graphic novel was about absolute trust in any authority and how, in the real world, it would be imposible for these men to weild power justly. The film doesnt hint at it at all. Its just a decent action movie that tries to be smarter than it is.
The right way to adapt this particular novel is to go a completely diffrent direction. Think about the original Frankenstein. When you take the source material and use it as a skeloten, you get a better film. When you try to adapt it literally, like in the nineties with Deniro, you get crap.
The Watchmen will make money now but will not be remembered in five years.
10:12PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Ok the movie was a solid B- to me due to some key aspects of the novel being left out that do actually make the world more of a real world experience with the regular people on the streets that brings the watchmen universe more down to earth for us. That was extremely disappointing indeed. The poetic values of the movie were stricken out of it.
Ok the movie was a solid B- to me due to some key aspects of the novel being left out that do actually make the world more of a real world experience with the regular people on the streets that brings the watchmen universe more down to earth for us. That was extremely disappointing indeed. The poetic values of the movie were stricken out of it.
This movie COULD have been truly realized correctly if they had two parted the movie or even three parted it just to get EVERYTHING in that made the novel exactly what it was meant to be. I understand why moore would be disgusted to watch them taint his TRUE poetic masterpiece.
The movie was good, just not a MASTERPIECE!!! In this sense The Dark Knight was a much better MOVIE, not just comic book movie but good enough film in itself to piss many of us off for not making the Oscar cut. Technically from editing to PACING even 300 was better and Sin City, but this had more of a damned if u do and damned if u don't aspect of it. No matter what was omitted Snyder would have failed someone somewhere, but this movie did have real nice visuals. Without the cool visuals and sets the movie would have been average at best.
The monologue that is supposed to be the one that shuts down all monologues was cut down which ruined a little of the experience for me. Dark Knight NEVER dragged and just had a better put screen play. The comic had more time to develop characters but would have made the movie 4 to 5 hours long. Nobody in the movie is just as captivating as The Joker was so from here on out, let's just not compare the two anymore like I have done so well, LOL...
I HATED the musical choice in watchmen which just didn't fit and felt out of place at many times, it needed a SCORE. I enjoyed the movie for what it did get right but also was disappointed for what it didn't. I honestly feel that they should have done volume 1 and 2 like kill bill to NAIL this sucker just right. B- yet again but good attempt, just not a masterpiece of an achievement. I think I understand why Moore wanted nothing to do with this due to many aspects of his story being tainted by time constraints and not truly being poetically realized. He knew they would never get it right and he knew why he wrote what he wrote twenty years ago for a reason.
The Joker's make up and style of how they chose to go about him tells you how seriously they took that piece of work where as if you look at Nixon's make up in Watchmen,you know there was some parody aspect to it that made him so unbelievable that it was annoying. It felt like a joke every time I saw him. Just wasn't taken seriously enough. The movie was confused on weather it wanted to be serious or a great big Joke poking fun at the original Novel it came from.
If I had never read the Book then this review would be absolutely different. Maybe better or worse but as I have read the book, I'm split down the middle. Only one phenomenal performance which was meant to shine even better with the Rorshauck bit, but they nullified a piece that could have been very promising and mentally engaging. Honestly this movie should have been TWO PARTS!!!!! As it rests it was good even maybe great but not a Masterpiece like the book and nowhere near it on many levels.
9:53PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
A full visual moving version...
A full visual moving version of the comic, in detail. How to disprove Synder's theory: one merely has to time the motion comic. Which of course, with excellent pacing, takes Adrian's exact words about his precise plan about 5 minutes to play out. Not even 20.
9:01PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
8:56PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
8:30PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Yeah, Malin Ackerman (?) was a little flat as Silk Spectre II but everyone else was note-perfect. Yes, Jackie Earle Haley deserves an Oscar nomination.
Yeah, Malin Ackerman (?) was a little flat as Silk Spectre II but everyone else was note-perfect. Yes, Jackie Earle Haley deserves an Oscar nomination.
7:42PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
7:12PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
But WOW what a great film! I wish there were more Superhero films that delved into adult themes and philosophy etc. It was absolutely fascinating to watch. Thematically the Watchmen hardly even touches on the more cliched ideas like good vs. evil and what they mean, it goes WAAAAAAY beyond that to the meaning of life and the purpose of humanity at its core. Incredible.
And the fight scenes were so good. Some of my favorite fight sequences done in a film ever.
And Malin struggles with her acting but...whew what a booty! Meow!
6:24PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
And I agree that Jackie Earle...
And I agree that Jackie Earle Haley deserves an Oscar.
5:52PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
At this point, reading some of the reviews, I've come to a conclusion:
Those who didn't like it, didn't get it.
Watchmen has, is, and always will be more than the sum of its parts, and I'm glad Snyder managed to carry that to the big screen. I didn't even like 300, so I went in with pretty fair to low expectations. It was just amazing.
At this point, reading some of the reviews, I've come to a conclusion:
Those who didn't like it, didn't get it.
Watchmen has, is, and always will be more than the sum of its parts, and I'm glad Snyder managed to carry that to the big screen. I didn't even like 300, so I went in with pretty fair to low expectations. It was just amazing.
5:22PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
GIVE HIM AN OSCAR !!!!!!
GIVE HIM AN OSCAR !!!!!!
3:39PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
2:12PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
But even though I enjoyed it, I don't see it having mass appeal. And leaving the theatre I heard many comments that seemed to confirm that. Most people were saying it was "okay", "different", or "weird".
But even though I enjoyed it, I don't see it having mass appeal. And leaving the theatre I heard many comments that seemed to confirm that. Most people were saying it was "okay", "different", or "weird".
2:09PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I dug it, for the most part, well except for that chick playing Silk...she was so flat. (in more ways than one)
sure, she seems to be good eye candy but that shouldn't be the basis to be cast.
and YES I felt that the film strayed away a bit from the character soul that the book has, this film has more action soul.
I dug it, for the most part, well except for that chick playing Silk...she was so flat. (in more ways than one)
sure, she seems to be good eye candy but that shouldn't be the basis to be cast.
and YES I felt that the film strayed away a bit from the character soul that the book has, this film has more action soul.
I'd see it again, but all in all it comes down to this person whom is supposed to be the Doc's glue to the world. to humanity and buddy, she can't sell it. I didn't buy that she was the glue. I wonder if this is really Hanna Montanna staring as Silk..because that's how she acts.
other than that it wasn't as bad as I thought it would have been. everything was great, not EPICALY AWESOME but great, some interesting action shots...and I liked the new ending. As one had said, it was refreshing.
But I regonize this not to be something as a subsitute for the book. That it is it's own stand alone thing.
so that's why (in few words) it gets a 9/10
2:03PM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
It's probably not gonna make Dark Knight $$$ but I hope it gets the props it deserves.
It's probably not gonna make Dark Knight $$$ but I hope it gets the props it deserves.
11:56AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:46AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Pros:
The Title Sequence. HOLY F***! Zack Snyder put his slow-motion fetish to good use and turned the introduction into an amazing year book that took pictures from the Under The Hood and other moments and brought them to life.
The Soundtrack. It all worked...
Pros:
The Title Sequence. HOLY F***! Zack Snyder put his slow-motion fetish to good use and turned the introduction into an amazing year book that took pictures from the Under The Hood and other moments and brought them to life.
The Soundtrack. It all worked out, even that MCR cover at the end -- with exception to hearing Leonard Cohen during a slow motion sex scene. Snyder loves his slow motion sex.
Rorschach. There was less of the interrogation than in the book, but Jackie Earle Haley nailed this character perfectly. Absolute translation.
The Ending. I may catch some flak for this, but after reading the same ending about 10 times...a different one was incredibly refreshing. And they made it make sense.
CONS:
Bubastis. I love the little bugger, but either put him around more often, or not at all. He shows up for the last 20 minutes, and I heard some people go "WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT THING!?"
Malin Akerman. The chick can't act. When I was watching her scenes it felt like she was on the sitcom set of a Disney movie. Not a fan.
Slow motion. With the exception of the opening credits, there didn't need to be slow motion every time someone jumped or broke a bone.
Hollis Mason. I think I saw him like...twice? Bad times.
Ozymandias. He needed to say "I DID IT!" -- and he had a little bit of a lisp...
All in all however, it felt like I was watching the book, and added little moments I hadn't expected...like dangly mob henchmen parts from ceilings, or a massive excess of blood.
Yay. 8/10
11:22AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
lame action, random sex scenes, out of place music, and bad plot easy to spot the bad guy.
oh well..
lame action, random sex scenes, out of place music, and bad plot easy to spot the bad guy.
oh well..
11:17AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
The only problems I would say this film had were the old age make-up, some of the songs from the soundtrack were out of place. Specifically, they were "Sounds of Silence," "Flight of the Valkyries," "All Along the...
The only problems I would say this film had were the old age make-up, some of the songs from the soundtrack were out of place. Specifically, they were "Sounds of Silence," "Flight of the Valkyries," "All Along the Watchtower," and especially "Hallelujah" during that awkward sex scene. I was disappointed that Hollis Mason got shortchanged in the film. Also, I wasn't too big on the portrayal of Adrian Veidt. He came off as a bit of a wimp. I always saw him as a confident, charming, and ambitious man. Not necessarily stone-faced.
Now, the good. Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Jackie Earle Haley, and Patrick Wilson were all incredible in their roles. Billy Crudup was excellent as Osterman/Manhattan, and Malin Akerman didn't disappoint me like I thought she would have after reading some of the early reviews. I thought Snyder handled the violence perfectly. It was meant to be unpleasant, and there was nothing gratuitous or glorified in the violent acts committed in the film.
The best aspect of the movie is the look of it. All the set pieces fit perfectly, the costumes are terrific, etc. etc.
Overall, I really enjoyed this film, and I'm happy that Zack Snyder did the unthinkable and adapted this 'unfilmable' material to satisfying standards. If it were handled by a lesser director, God help them from all the rabid fans...
9:10AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Not a GREAT movie.
I'd watch it again.
Something I can't put my finger on was definitely off. The acting was fine, it was gory at certain points (kiddies love the gore, don't they?)and the visuals were pretty good, but...
Not a GREAT movie.
I'd watch it again.
Something I can't put my finger on was definitely off. The acting was fine, it was gory at certain points (kiddies love the gore, don't they?)and the visuals were pretty good, but something just wasn't there.
Maybe it's just me.
8:54AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Like Moore's book adapted...
Like Moore's book adapted almost page by page by Zack Snyder, "Watchmen" is a psychological testament of heroism vs. vigilantism, with politics, sex, and violence thrown in for good measure. "Watchmen" has been hailed as one of the 100 books that You Must Read Before You Die and is also hailed as one of the top 25 graphic novels ever made.
The book has it's own pietistic cult following among comic-book store owners, geeks, and Hollywood elites. I happen to fall under the geek category and proudly accept that title.
I will say Zack Snyder is 3 for 3. He remade George Romero's "Dawn of the Dead" and made a successful remake that still delves into how Americans are swept up in consumerism, commercialism, and industrialism--- it also dealt with the usual "zombie-lore" of 'Would you go to the length of killing your loved one or best friend if they were bitten?
Then, he made a page-by-page, panel-by-panel kick-ass adaptation of Frank Miller's "300" and now he has come to this state.
Zack Snyder, I give you my full-on jubilation. You adapted the most hardest adaptable book (over 20 years it has taken and been in 'development hell' in Hollywood circles and studios) and yet here you've made the impossible seem possible. You are the real Dr. Manhattan.
Everyone complaining about you being too stylized or you injected too much testosterone into this need to cool it. You had a blend of story and action; you can't tell me Paul Greengrass wouldn't stylize this movie if he was given it. He does that all the time with the "Bourne" movies in the fight scenes.
However, I did feel some song choices were out the place. Bob Dylan's "The Times They Are A Changing" worked; "Along the Clocktower" worked too but KC & the Sunshine band blaring over the riot scene didn't work for me, neither did "99 Luftballoons" or Chemical Romance during the end credits doing an edgier, rockier Bob Dylan's "Desolation Row."
I also at times didn't like Billy Crudup as Dr. Manhattan. I found him to be too extraterrestrial; as if he was a better Klaatu then Keanau Reeves was in the remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still." I've always pictured Manhattan to sound like God; a thunderous voice not one that sounds so monotonous, so soporific that it almost sounds too animatronic. Maybe it was intentional to get the sense that Manhattan has chosen this new voice or way of speaking because he is so destitute to help others or find care and joy in the world that his voice must come off as that too. If that was the case than it is only minor for me.
Otherwise, everything and the cast works. Even Snyder's signature slow-mo but brutal fight sequences that are expanded out more than compared to the book's panels work. Each one is more bone-crunching and bloodspilling then the last one. (*SPOILER* I didn't miss the Giant Squid at the end but I did miss seeing Hollis Mason aka Night Owl 1 get killed. I also wish we could've got some scenes of Captain Metropolis and the Minutemen actually talking but oh well...)
Jackie Earle Haley IS Rorschach and if he isn't brought up next year for Oscar time than I say, "F.U. Academy!" Haley with his staidly deep voice makes Rorschach into a likeable sociopath. (Is that possible?) He takes on the decadence and grime with violence and wit.
Jeffrey Dean Morgan as The Comedian is also likeable despite he does bad things (which I won't give away so either SEE THE DAMN MOVIE or READ THE DAMN BOOK & THEN SEE THE MOVIE!)
Patrick Wilson IS Night Owl II. As Dan Drieberg/Night Owl II, he captures Dan's hopes and fears; his battles of divulging his darkest secrets (one including his sexual impotency and virginity). Carla Gugino as Silk Spectre I is sexy even in her sixties. Gugino should be in lace, lingere, and garters in every movie!
Malin Akerman as Silk Spectre II is cute and fetching.
Matthew Goode as Ozymandias held his own. In the scenes, where he unleashes upon our heroes is where the acting chops really flew out of him. Otherwise, in some scenes he comes off too "prettyboyish"; too much of a playboy and privileged brat for my tastes. Hell, the book made him out like that too.
All in all, I feel this, "The Dark Knight", and "Spider-Man" are the best superhero movies ever made. Even if you maybe didn't like this movie like I did the first time, I urge you to see a second time because your mood might shift to liking it more. I felt the only wee problems were the song choices and some of the line delivery but otherwise I felt it was enjoyable and well-adapted.
This as close we'll ever get to the perfection of Alan Moore; so fan-boys cool it. Maybe one day we'll get a remake of this, as we do with every other movie---good or bad. I personally think the director's cut will put all the people who didn't like it to rest and for all of us who really liked it, I plan to see it again, and hope you will too.
7:10AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
it didn't matter which decade the songs were from (if u actually watched the movie, u should realise that they weren't all from the 1980s)
it didn't matter which decade the songs were from (if u actually watched the movie, u should realise that they weren't all from the 1980s)
6:02AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:55AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
An obsession is beginning to form... and I'm beginning to think this is a good thing.
And to the numb nuts out their who say that the music choices are bad in the film, I ask: What did you want, Joy Division? Maybe a little bit of Boy George? Not enough Bow...
An obsession is beginning to form... and I'm beginning to think this is a good thing.
And to the numb nuts out their who say that the music choices are bad in the film, I ask: What did you want, Joy Division? Maybe a little bit of Boy George? Not enough Bow Wow Wow? Or was it the lack of Duran Duran?
Seriously, how can you dog on the choices. The story is set in the 80's! What do you want? Limp Bizkit.
Point Zack Snyder.
4:43AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
From the beginning, snyder immediately introduces the audience to the watchmen's world and history. People who arent aware of the book wont be left in a daze.
The pace was good and no fillers in...
From the beginning, snyder immediately introduces the audience to the watchmen's world and history. People who arent aware of the book wont be left in a daze.
The pace was good and no fillers in between - I didnt realise 160 minutes had passed.
Visually spectacular - the costumes, sets, effects were great.
There were lot of songs used in the movie - could use just a few of them, as some of them I think were not suitable or needed.
The characters were brought to life brilliantly by all actors.
The action set pieces were good - Loved the prison scene!
This movie is brilliant - and no doubt , in part due to the source novel.
I havent read the novel in years, but thankfully so, because i wanted to watch the movie fresh without any expectations. And i felt rewarded for it.
Can't wait for the DVD special edition!!
10/10
2:48AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
1:56AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10/10
10/10
1:55AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
1:40AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
No squid? No problem. The story still has the same affect as it did in the comic. And to be honest, it was probably for the best that they left the squid out of the flick. I think it would have been difficult to pull...
No squid? No problem. The story still has the same affect as it did in the comic. And to be honest, it was probably for the best that they left the squid out of the flick. I think it would have been difficult to pull off. But the substitute they used for the film, like I said, worked just as well.
Everything all around was solid. Flashbacks were put in at the right moments, the opening title sequence was brilliant, the visuals were stunning, the acting was terrific (although I will say Malin Ackerman was probably the weakest of the bunch, but still did a fair job I think) and the music choices were great.
One of the many things I liked so much about it was how much people who weren't familiar with the source material loved it, and got it! I saw it with a bunch of friends who had no prior knowledge about the graphic novel (other than what little I told them beforehand, which was pretty much that it's a deconstruction of the superhero) and they absolutely loved the flick and were talking about it afterward like they were well educated in the graphic novel. Now to pull that off, in my opinion, is a truly amazing feat. Well done, Mr. Snyder. And thank you!
12:47AM on 03/07/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Very very VERY good.
Very very VERY good.
11:44PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:27PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Compared to the comic book, it's only a 6/10. But I always watch a movie open-minded, as a stand alone. This is how I loved the film. The music is mixed well with the film. The action is great, and it doesn't even count up for 30% of the film....
Compared to the comic book, it's only a 6/10. But I always watch a movie open-minded, as a stand alone. This is how I loved the film. The music is mixed well with the film. The action is great, and it doesn't even count up for 30% of the film. The best part about the film was, you guessed it, the story.
The story for the film is just about as amazing as it was in the graphic novel. From the Comedian being killed to the big revielation at the end, Znyder puts the flash backs in the right spots and the character deveopment is still great.
For the acting, everyone did great, except for Silk Spectre. I still say she did good, but there are many faults in her performance.
If you want to watch the Watchmen, I suggest you go in there open minded and not try to compare the film to the graphic novel.
11:17PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:57PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:45PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Visually amazing, well-acted, and will certainly stay with me for a while. It was far from perfect, but I'd see it again in a heartbeat.
Visually amazing, well-acted, and will certainly stay with me for a while. It was far from perfect, but I'd see it again in a heartbeat.
10:02PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
faults ... yes
could it have gotten things any better, i really don't think so. i left feeling satisfied, excited, and happy that it wasn't necessarily a panel by panel adaptation. i felt the end result kept the tone and commentary everyone loved from the book. besides the crazy music cues, 9/10.
full review:
faults ... yes
could it have gotten things any better, i really don't think so. i left feeling satisfied, excited, and happy that it wasn't necessarily a panel by panel adaptation. i felt the end result kept the tone and commentary everyone loved from the book. besides the crazy music cues, 9/10.
full review: [link]
9:31PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
8:50PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
its a fact there are things that need to work to form a masterpiece not just the materialization of something as great as the graphic Novel actually making it to the Big Screen, Things have actually have to happen to label a film a masterpiece, dont just call it that cause there was lots of hype, amazing source and that fact that it made it to screen, tons of elements of...
its a fact there are things that need to work to form a masterpiece not just the materialization of something as great as the graphic Novel actually making it to the Big Screen, Things have actually have to happen to label a film a masterpiece, dont just call it that cause there was lots of hype, amazing source and that fact that it made it to screen, tons of elements of the FILM just didnt work own up, its not a matter of opinion.
8:36PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
8:13PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
[link]
[link]
8:08PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Almost "Dark Knight"-greatness, but both films come very close as possible to perfection, in my opinion. Completely blown away, seeing it one or two more times before it leaves theatres.
Almost "Dark Knight"-greatness, but both films come very close as possible to perfection, in my opinion. Completely blown away, seeing it one or two more times before it leaves theatres.
7:27PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I think my main complaint is that for an almost 3 hour movie it seems rushed. While the runtime does go by fast, the characters and events we see are not given proper time to breathe and soak in. By the last 40 minutes of the film, it’s just a total information overload. While this will probably be fixed in the upcoming “ultimate cut”, for now those that said “Watchmen” is unfilmable as a movie because of the vast amount of information and subplots in the book are proven somewhat right.
And also, a lot of the violence seemed forced and unnecessary to me. While I liked the expanded sex scene (I know call me a perv) a lot of the violence seemed way too gratuitous. My main problems where the fight between Laurie and Dan vs. the knot-tops (we didn’t need to see bones pooping there at all), and the different way that Rorschach disposed of Blair Roche’s killer (actually that scene may just be my biggest problem with the film, it’s just gore for the sake of gore; and isn’t the way that Rorschach disposed of him in the book much more gruesome, if less gory?). While I liked some of the added action/violence (beginning fight, prison fight), a lot of it just seemed forced and was just violence for violence’s sake.
As for the ending, I’ll go ahead and say it; the “McGuffin” in the film is MUCH more effective than the squid. Call me a blasphemer, but that is the one instance that they actually improved upon the source material. I do have a huge problem with the ending, and that is the completely unnecessary beating that Nite-Owl gives Ozymandias at the end. While I understand that Veidt sitting there and taking the beating signifies his “penance” for his crime, it just felt to me as yet more completely unnecessary violence. It was the “Hollywood” ending, “well he’s the bad guy so he’s gotta get his ass kicked at the end”. Whatever.
That said, the film was very impressive visually and while sometimes uneven does manage to cover the book’s storyline into its runtime fairly well. And I’m glad that the books epilogue was left intact. Overall, I was slightly disappointed, but I still like it and recommend it.
It gets a B from me.
6:21PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
first overrated movie of the year
first overrated movie of the year
6:02PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:59PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:53PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:48PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:33PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:28PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Need to see it again on IMAX and really looking forward to seeing the Directors cut and then the ultimate with black freighter cut in....
Need to see it again on IMAX and really looking forward to seeing the Directors cut and then the ultimate with black freighter cut in. wonder if they will incorporate some of the side story lines that were obvious cuts for the theatrical, such as the psychiatrist's story line in truly believing he can help walter and the effect that has on his marriage, or the riots leading up to the end and the murder of hollis.
5:23PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:13PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
And everyones argument about the ending, its still the same theme. And regarding why would...
And everyones argument about the ending, its still the same theme. And regarding why would Russia and other countries help us, because I think the writers felt if Dr. Manhattan can do that shit to America it sort of felt like it was him against the world sort of thing. Idk. Movie was 7/10.
3 Points for Rorschach
1 Points for Malin Akerman's tits
1 Point for Imax
1 Point for Jailbreak scene
1 Point for opening montage
1 Point for The Comedian
-1 Dr. Manhattan blue dick lol
4:57PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
4:44PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Anyway, I plan on seeing it tonight!
Anyway, I plan on seeing it tonight!
4:04PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I don't know what the fuck it is you people want.
That shit was incredible. I wish it was 4 hours long.
"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you. You're locked in here with me."
- classic!
and that superhero karate shit they were doing was also awesome as well.
I don't know what the fuck it is you people want.
That shit was incredible. I wish it was 4 hours long.
"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you. You're locked in here with me."
- classic!
and that superhero karate shit they were doing was also awesome as well.
3:11PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:09PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
2:35PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
2:20PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
2:08PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
and thought provoking to...if your into that sort of thing
definitely lived up to the hype
and thought provoking to...if your into that sort of thing
definitely lived up to the hype
1:45PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
1:33PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
that said, the "where's the fucking squid" pic cracked me up.
that said, the "where's the fucking squid" pic cracked me up.
1:18PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
The characters are so fucking true to the comic it blows your mind. I literally can’t pick a favorite. The comedian was perfect, Rorschach was fucking Rorschach, and Manhattan is beautiful. Same as Nite Owl, Silk, and Ozy. Kudos to Snyder. If this film doesn’t solidify him as an A+ director then fuck everybody who says he's not.
Two personal surprises were that 1. Adrian Veidt doesn’t suck…in fact, he kicks fucking ass and 2. Nite-owl, while still remaining impotent and pent up like the comics, takes his “in-suit” persona to a whole new level of awesome making me totally re-evaluate the way I felt towards his comic book counterpart.
Awesome, truly awesome. A near perfect adaptation. Can’t wait for the Black Freighter induced version. I will be seeing this film again, in the theater, it’s that good.
P.S. The blue dick is way over hyped. It’s there, but it’s not distracting unless you’re an idiot.
1:17PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I'm still gonna watch it though.
I'm still gonna watch it though.
1:02PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Watchmen. Watchmen. So much hype has surrounded this film, the internet has been rife with opinions, and nerdgasms, and...
Watchmen. Watchmen. So much hype has surrounded this film, the internet has been rife with opinions, and nerdgasms, and excitement. I decided to go see the midnight premier last night, I went by myself, though I was far from alone. I am pretty sure the entire unwashed nerd community of Jacksonville turned up in my theater last night, which took away from my viewing experience a little bit. I knew this was a movie that would drag them out of their anti-social hovels so they could keep their dork-cred, but I figured they would have a little respect for the deeper meanings of the film. Of course I was mistaken. I’m going to go see it again, possibly with a few friends once it has been out for a while and there will be less of a crowd. But I wanted to get down my first impressions this morning while they still linger.
This movie is, in a way, prophetic, frightening, exciting, disgusting, disturbing, and hopeful. Yes, hopeful. For those who’ve been under rocks for the past 2 months, here is the basic premise. It is 1985, not the 1985 I was born into that we remember, but the 1985 of some twisted parallel universe where Nixon is running the country during a fifth term, and masked heroes were real. I say “were” because after about 40 years of heroes, the public turned against them and Nixon outlawed them. These aren’t people with superpowers (with the exception of one Dr. Manhattan), these are people with great training, dedication, and access to enough money and gadgets to give them a leading edge in crime fighting. But their day has been gone for sometime, and we come into a world where the Nuclear Doomsday Clock is set 5 minutes to midnight as the US and USSR face-off over Afgahnistan (remember that?) and one of the last heroes, the Comedian, has been murdered. Which leads the hero remnants to begin an investigation the brings their (not-so) secret society’s history full circle, and leads to the discovery of something far worse.
The title of this page is combo quote between Patrick Wilson’s Nightowl and Jeffery Dean Morgan’s Comedian, during a violent riot in one of the flashback scenes of the film. To me it captures the essence of the entire movie, and speaks bitingly to our time. This movie is pregnant with real world implications, I wonder if anyone else in the audience left last night wondering what our clocks are set to. Yet at the same time, depite it’s catastrophic conclusion, there is a sense of recovery at the end, something I think Obama has been trying to get through to us in our own world. Yes we face horrible times ahead, yes it is possible that humanity is about to go through the crucible, and not everyone will come out on the other side, but when it’s over, those left standing will be stronger, and more willing to fix the mistakes that lead us here, we hope.
That is the message I took from this movie. That message alone is enough to want me to see it again. But wait, there’s more.
The direction and style of this movie is nearly immaculate. It totally immerses you into it’s world and never manages to loose itself, something I feel that “The Dark Knight” and “Lord of the Rings” both did towards the end, not to take away my love of those films, but I’ll easily admit their flaws. My biggest issue with Watchmen is Carla Gugino (Silk Spectre II), who it’s seems wouldn’t be able to act her way out of a cardboard box. Most of her lines are delivered with such a flat earnestness and disingenuousness that I had a hard time appreciating her particular predicament. One thing I can say positively for her is that what she lacks in her lines, she makes up for in her screen presence. She is able to pull off the poise, beauty, and physical prowess of Silk Spectre II, she just couldn’t convince me of the character’s emotional reality. Jeffery Dean Morgan is excellent, managing to instill both pity and absolute disgust with his character the Comedian, there is an attempted rape scene with him, that is so horrifying, so brutal and disgusting, that it disturbed me more than any of the rest of the violence in this movie, and there is some major violence, some really gross instances, but the inhumanity of that sexual violence shook me the most. This was the point where I wanted to walk out, not just because of the scene, but because of the audiences' reaction it. People giggled, someone in front of me said "teach that bitch a lesson". I realized that this audience came for spectacle, and they got thier fill, they love violence the way Romans loved the Coliseum. I don't mind violence in a movie, but it has to have point. There was no pointless violence in Watchemn, just people who didn't get the point.
Matthew Goode, who I admired and pitied with as the unlucky husband in “Imagine Me and You” brings us Ozzymandias, the world’s smartest man, and delivers each line with the self-assuredness of the ego maniac that he is, and totally makes him believable. Billy Cruddup shines as Dr. Manhattan, the only superpowered individual. Dr. M’s accident which gave him his powers also removed his humanity, not in an evil way, but in an [link] way. Yes he’s blue, and yes he’s naked (with matching blue penis) for most of the movie, but looking into those shining fathomless eyes is both truly frightening and awe inspiring, and his coldly delivered lines went to the core of me. Rorshach, played by Jackie Earle Haley is a realist to a fault. His brutality is the only one explained, and in the movie, as in the comic book source, it is hard to fault him. Patrick Wilson as Nightowl is perfect. Outside his costume he is nerdy, bumbling, shy, kind, and endearing. In the cape and cowl he is strong, self-assured, good, and a great fighter. Wilson manages to bring a great humility to his role, and is possibly the perfect embodiment of his comic book counter part.
All in all, this movie is excellent. I recommend it to everyone, and just ask that you look beyond the spectacle, and let it's substance overwhelm you as it overwhelmed me.
12:40PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
-Janey Slater in the TV studio
-The girl playing Janey Slater's performance
-Fighting scenes were brutal, ok, but too 'martial-artsie'. Don't like Rorschach throwing ninja kicks.
-Too long sex scene
-Nite Owl & Silk Spectre seem to allow Rorschach to go to the Big Figure with a smile on...
-Janey Slater in the TV studio
-The girl playing Janey Slater's performance
-Fighting scenes were brutal, ok, but too 'martial-artsie'. Don't like Rorschach throwing ninja kicks.
-Too long sex scene
-Nite Owl & Silk Spectre seem to allow Rorschach to go to the Big Figure with a smile on their faces. In the comic they don't even know Big Figure's in the toilet
-They never showed you where Laurie got the gun in the end
-Laurie's scene in Mars didn't convince me
Anyway, maybe there's some more stuff but I can't think of it right now. I'm definitely watching it again and think that JEH should get an oscar for his performance, as well.
12:26PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Loved it
going back for more!
Loved it
going back for more!
12:02PM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:40AM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:14AM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:14AM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
My rating: 7/10
11:08AM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
8.5/10
P.S. This thing needs to be seen more than once. Based on what I saw and what I've heard...You'll benefit yourself GREATLY seeing it twice. I'll be doing it myself soon enough.
11:08AM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:42AM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:42AM on 03/06/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
9/10 stars