Weekend Box-Office
![]()
WEEKEND BOX-OFFICE
![]()
Audiences loving their Avatar...
![]()
James Cameron's AVATAR continued to kick mighty ass at the box-office this past weekend, finishing atop all the other films, despite the release of 5 new movies over the past week. In fact, AVATAR only lost 2% of its audience from last weekend (it made $77M last week, $75M this week) and is now on pace to possibly surpass the $400M mark, if this trend continues (it's made $212M in its first 10 days of release).
Out of all the new releases, Guy Ritchie's updated SHERLOCK HOLMES managed to highest returns, as it opened in 2nd place with a very respectable $65M. The film actually set the record for biggest Christmas Day opening of all-time on Friday, as it scored close to $25M on that one day alone (the previous mark was $14.4M set by MARLEY AND ME just last year).
The sequel to ALVIN AND THE CHIPMUNKS actually opened better than the original film back in 2007 (the original opened with $44M and ended up making an astonishing $217M!), scoring $50M in what actually turned out to be the biggest box-office weekend of all-time! (nice way to end off the year) The previous mark was set in July of 2008, during the weekend in which THE DARK KNIGHT was released, but this weekend, all the films managed $278M in returns, an all-time finish.
In the meantime, the film that everyone and their uncle Bob has been praising for weeks now, UP IN THE AIR, finally opened wide and managed to slip into the top 5 with close to $12M in grosses (which was about the same amount it had made so far in limited release). The other new release of the week, IT'S COMPLICATED, starring "your parents" Meryl Streep and Alec Baldwin, managed a decent showing in 4th place with about $22M. Seems like there was a little something for every age group this past weekend (and next weekend as well, as all the same films will continue to vie for the top spot).

Despite dropping from 3rd to 6th place this weekend, THE BLIND SIDE actually gained 17% more moviegoers this weekend than last, and is now approaching the $200M mark (it's at $184M now -- the film only cost $29M to make). THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG might be the only film that one may describe as a "disappointment" this past weekend, as it dropped from 2nd to 7th place, but more importantly, lost the greatest amount of its audience from last weekend from all the films in the top 10, which was about 30%. The film has now made about $63M, which is decent, but apparently it cost about $105M to produce, so I'm not sure how that bodes for future Disney 2D animated features.
NINE could also be considered a "disappointment" (maybe even a flop?) as it opened in 8th place with only about $6M, despite costing about $90M to make. The films that dropped out of the top 10 this week include NEW MOON ($281M), A CHRISTMAS CAROL ($136M), BROTHERS ($25M) and OLD DOGS ($46M).
Next weekend sees no new releases, but no worries folks...we've got two polls to tide you over until then. First of all, what's your favorite movie to watch during the holidays (VOTE HERE for that one) and the big question of the week...what was your favorite movie of the year (VOTE HERE for that one)?
| 1. Avatar | $ 75 Million | $ 212.3 Million |
| 2. Sherlock Holmes | $ 65.4 Million | |
| 3. Alvin and the... | $ 50.2 Million | $ 77.1 Million |
| 4. It's Complicated | $ 22.1 Million | |
| 5. Up in the Air | $ 11.8 Million | $ 24.5 Million |
| 6. The Blind Side | $ 11.7 Million | $ 184.4 Million |
| 7. The Princess and... | $ 8.7 Million | $ 63.4 Million |
| 8. Nine | $ 5.5 Million | |
| 9. Did You Hear about... | $ 5 Million | $ 15.6 Million |
| 10. Invictus | $ 4.4 Million | $ 23.4 Million |
ACCESS BOX-OFFICE ARCHIVES HERE
Source: BoxOfficeMojo.com






































































































3:31PM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
5:54PM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
1:28PM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
The above numbers are US domestic not the whole world. As of today, worldwide: $615,168,000.
The above numbers are US domestic not the whole world. As of today, worldwide: $615,168,000.
1:00PM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
But on a lighter note... Alvin... really? Thanks for taking your k...
But on a lighter note... Alvin... really? Thanks for taking your kids to this shit parents! #3 on the way! Grrrr
3:11AM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I saw it a week ago with my family, and my Dad declared it the best movie he's ever seen, even beating out Star...
I saw it a week ago with my family, and my Dad declared it the best movie he's ever seen, even beating out Star Wars when it was released. I initially found this hard to believe, but given that they were both releases with unprecedented visuals which incredibly raised the bar... I may hold my tongue (granted Star wars obviously had a great story to accompany it while, as many have stated, Avatar is lacking in that department.. it's hard not to make that declaration when walking out from that 3D visual orgasm). Bravo Jim, Bravo.
2:19AM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
But good for Cameron. Congratulations.
www.rainestorm.com
But good for Cameron. Congratulations.
www.rainestorm.com
3:05PM on 12/29/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
(Sorry. I'm in the middle of my first Patrick O'Brian novel)
www.rainestorm.com
(Sorry. I'm in the middle of my first Patrick O'Brian novel)
www.rainestorm.com
1:46PM on 12/29/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
At any rate, you provided very sound arguments. I, too, hated Avatar's marketing campaign, and I'm definitely not the biggest fan of 3D, so I see your points. Thanks for the debate. I won't get as mad next time you hate on my precious Avatar! Dig your blog, btw.
12:12PM on 12/29/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I don't suppose I ever thought of it as a "guns-blazing hate campaign" but I see your point.
I guess in the case of "Avatar" I'm rebelling against the hype. I find that as often as not, movies not only fail to live up to their respective hype, but they fail miserably. In your list, you mentioned "The Lord of the Rings,...
I don't suppose I ever thought of it as a "guns-blazing hate campaign" but I see your point.
I guess in the case of "Avatar" I'm rebelling against the hype. I find that as often as not, movies not only fail to live up to their respective hype, but they fail miserably. In your list, you mentioned "The Lord of the Rings," "The Dark Knight," and "King Kong." I hated all three of those films. Well, to be fair, I only really hated "The Return of the King" but people positively insist on treating all three films as one film, which, if I were to do the same, I would have to ignore "The Fellowship of the Ring" and "The Two Towers" based solely on the third film.
But I digress.
I'm rebelling against the hype of "Avatar" based on three things.
1) The self-promotion. We were hearing for years and years how this was going to be a "game-changing" movie and it was going to advance special effects to the Nth degree and blah-blah-blah... pretty much the same thing we heard from Lucas on the "Star Wars" prequels.
2) The trailers. They just look dull. The special effects actually look worse than even "The Phantom Menace" because Cameron has fallen victim to the mistaken notion that a series of fully CG rendered frames look real and convincing. Not one preview or clip has changed my mind on that.
3) The reviews. Yes, every review is raving about this movie. Then again, every review raved about "The Dark Knight" and "The Return of the King," which, as I mentioned previously, I disliked. But even the most rave reviews are saying that it's a hackneyed plot with bad acting, rotten dialogue and even so-so special effects. The only thing that's really getting attention is the 3D, in which I am not interested. In fact, even the most rave fanboy review is saying there's no point in seeing "Avatar" unless it's in 3D, which only furthers my skepticism. A two hour and 40 minute movie to push a gimmick that's been around for nearly 60 years? And at an extra cost? No, thank you.
As to why I post repeatedly. Well... I get bored. What can I say? But really, what's the difference between me posting the same thing over and over again and you or others posting the same thing over and over again? Do people who love the film get a special pass to repost their thoughts repeatedly?
I disagree.
9:43AM on 12/29/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
My wife is a big fan of movies like Sex and the City and New Moon, so I see most chick flicks that come out. While they aren't my cup of tea, I can appreciate that they exist for people that aren't salivating fanboys and move on with my life.
An example: I think that "Percy Jackson and the blah blah" looks like shite, but it's not really meant for me. It's for the kids. I can tell you that if it looks as though I'm proven wrong about Percy Jackson and it has an 83% on the Tomato meter and my fellow Schmoes give it a 95%, I'll definitely check it out. Because I love movies...especially good movies.
If you're a movie fan, trust me, Avatar was meant for you! Unless you hated movies like Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, The Matrix, Iron Man, The Dark Knight, King Kong, Aliens and other kick-ass, epic action/adventure flicks. If you didn't like any of these, you wont like Avatar. If you like any of these movies, or just like having fun at the cinema, I highly recommend Avatar. I don't think you'll be disappointed.
5:39PM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I comment on it as a film fan, as well as a sci-fi and action fan when I see a phenomenon I don't understand.
Why do you comment on movies? Or do you only comment positively? NEVER in the negative? Kudos to you, sir, if that be the case. However, it is a bit disingenuous to have people pre...
I comment on it as a film fan, as well as a sci-fi and action fan when I see a phenomenon I don't understand.
Why do you comment on movies? Or do you only comment positively? NEVER in the negative? Kudos to you, sir, if that be the case. However, it is a bit disingenuous to have people presume you like everything you see.
I find it equally ironic when people chastise me for judging a movie I have never seen. Please let me know what you think of "Did You Hear About the Morgans?" or "Sex and the City." Or tell me why you haven't seen them, if that be the case.
www.rainestorm.com
3:25PM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
12:28PM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
www.rainestorm.com
www.rainestorm.com
8:38AM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
But good for you. Congratulations.
But good for you. Congratulations.
1:10AM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:30PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Also the only way to see Avatar is in 3D, best experience in a theater I've ever had.
Also the only way to see Avatar is in 3D, best experience in a theater I've ever had.
11:09PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
12:35PM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:38PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
10:34PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
9:33PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Personally, I'd like to see how much Avatar made on just regular ticket prices, with the inflated IMAX and 3D ticket prices factored out. My guess is that it would be roughly half to two-thirds of its current revenue.
Personally, I'd like to see how much Avatar made on just regular ticket prices, with the inflated IMAX and 3D ticket prices factored out. My guess is that it would be roughly half to two-thirds of its current revenue.
8:37PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
11:44PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
8:52PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
So even though you thought it looked like crap you still wanted it to do well? I'm confused by what you're saying.
So even though you thought it looked like crap you still wanted it to do well? I'm confused by what you're saying.
7:53PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
7:35PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
8:53PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
6:38PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
4:27PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
4:26PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
4:19PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:57PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I hope Cameron starts part 2 like ASAP!!! LoL
I hope Cameron starts part 2 like ASAP!!! LoL
12:52PM on 12/28/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
the story of avatar 1 is classic and self contained. I don't want to see it corrupted like the first matrix was.
but hey if he can do what he did with T2 or Aliens I'll be in bliss. I just don't want to sit through
Avatar II: The Corporation Strikes Back
the story of avatar 1 is classic and self contained. I don't want to see it corrupted like the first matrix was.
but hey if he can do what he did with T2 or Aliens I'll be in bliss. I just don't want to sit through
Avatar II: The Corporation Strikes Back
6:04PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
You're out of you fuckin mind if you think there isn't much story left to tell.
Even if it ends up taking place on another world, a sequel is still completely possible- and it will happen and be completely different from Avatar 1, but still true to it.
You're out of you fuckin mind if you think there isn't much story left to tell.
Even if it ends up taking place on another world, a sequel is still completely possible- and it will happen and be completely different from Avatar 1, but still true to it.
4:47PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I have a feeling he'll pick another moon if he cashes in for a sequel
I have a feeling he'll pick another moon if he cashes in for a sequel
3:49PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
6:31AM on 12/30/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:46PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
3:42PM on 12/27/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile