So much has been made of TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN and its director Michael Bay. Some view him as the genius behind BAD BOYS and others view him as the king of porking playmates. My cousin's best friend sees him as the fake-tanned dude who ruined THE ISLAND, but my sister's piano teacher's butcher sees him as the man who gave Megan Fox a career. How do the faithful users of IMDB see him? Check it out below.

Extra Tidbit:
Who would you rather be: Michael Bay or Hitler?
10:20PM on 07/02/2009
I can look it up as well, but my point was that the...
I can look it up as well, but my point was that the amount of money it made was good. Ie a lot people went to see it. I know it wasnt PROFITABLE, but that wasnt really my point. People went and hated it, as some did with TF2...what i meant was that making money isnt the only criteria for a successful movie.
Films are remembered for everything they encompass, good story, effects, characters etc. Bay’s movies, although for the most part are profitable, they are not anything but fluff. Good fluff is still fluff (even if I don’t think its good).
We remember characters and names because they mean something. John Connor, Sarah Connor, even Kyle Reese…heck how about Hudson and hicks from aliens. I haven’t watched aliens in years and years (even though I own it) but I remember all the names from that film…they were characters. I own transformer toys and the original cartoons and I still don’t remember any of the robots from bay's transformers! They even used devastator in part one and everyone seems to have forgotten that.
What was Sean Connerys name in the rock? What made us remember that film. It was a good action movie, passable, but nothing to die over. It aint no Road Warrior.
transformers part one had a mountain dew machine that was a transformer. how can anyone think that was great?