Latest Entertainment News Headlines

Review: Into the Woods

Into the Woods
12.24.2014
7 10

PLOT: Based on the 1987 musical of the same name, INTO THE WOODS brings several fairy tales - including Cinderella, Jack and the Beanstalk, Rapunzel and Little Red Riding Hood - to vivid life and combines them into one convoluted story.

REVIEW: The good news for fans of Stephen Sondheim and James Lapine's classic musical INTO THE WOODS is that, despite the involvement of Disney, it's still a fairly dark and strange production, filled with creepy characters, sexual innuendos and death. The bad news is, that stuff is noticeably muted, with the more challenging elements more or less alluded to rather than explored. It's probably as weird as could be hoped for in Disney's hands, but the real purists will most likely leave unsatisfied, the meatier content having been truncated or excised.

For folks who don't know the musical, Rob Marshall's film should provide an entertaining and clever diversion, not quite a revelatory experience but a fun one. The cast is terrific, the intersecting stories are involving, and the songs are clever and elaborate. It's too long, for certain; at a little over two hours, the fantastical world built by Marshall and his team wears out its welcome eventually. Before that turning point, however, it moves along with enough energy to keep a handle on your attention.

The hook of INTO THE WOODS, of course, is to insert adult context into familiar fairy tales. But familiar fairy tales they are: Cinderella (Anna Kendrick) is still dealing with her evil stepmother and stepsisters and teasing the handsome prince (Chris Pine in smug handsome bastard mode); Rapunzel (MacKenzie Mauzy) is still trapped in a doorless tower by her adopted mother, a sneering witch (Meryl Streep) who took the girl when she was a baby from her peasant neighbors. A LIttle Red Riding Hood (Lilla Crawford) is still being sexually menaced by the Big Bad Wolf, although here he's more of a pimp than animal. (Yes, this is the creepiest section of the movie, with 50-year-old Depp thrusting his crotch at prepubescent Crawford.) Young Jack (Daniel Huttlestone) is still unwisely trading for magic beans and incurring the wrath of giants who live in the clouds, while his worried mother (Tracy Ullman) frets.

All these stories collide and connect, mostly thanks to the presence of the Baker (a very likable James Corden) and the Baker's Wife (Emily Blunt), who go on a mission at the Witch's behest to collect three disparate items; this will rid them of the curse that leaves them childless. As they go about their scavenger hunt (they only have three days, arbitrarily), they meet the other fairy tale protagonists, some of whom have just the items they need.

Of course, these many journeys are accompanied by song, and the cast acquits itself well in this department. Streep can belt one out, proving so with the strangely touching "Stay With Me." Kendrick, who we already know can sing, really impresses with a Broadway-ready voice, as does Emily Blunt, who is terrific in the film in general. Even Chris Pine shows he can carry a tune with the production's funniest song, "Agony," which is a duet with his fellow prince (Billy Magnussen).

Somehow, though, the movie never really pops off the screen. The limits of the stage are still present in Marshall's direction, interestingly enough; despite the fact that he's got millions of dollars to play with and a team of visual effects artists capable of just about anything, INTO THE WOODS still feels stage-bound. Perhaps that's intentional, something for the theater crowd to hang onto, but it's slightly disappointing to find the movie never achieves the kind of epic visual grandeur you might hope for.

But most will come to see this colorful cast sing their hearts out, and on that front, there's no doubt INTO THE WOODS has the goods.

CLICK IMAGE TO OPEN GALLERY & SEE MORE PICS...

Source: JoBlo.com

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

3:27PM on 12/25/2014
Okay, well, they have to retrieve FOUR items, not three. That's actually a vital component of the story, so I'm wary that if you missed that, what else you may not have picked up on...
As a huge Sondheim follower, this adaptation is about as good and as strong as any fan could really ever expect. The film is actually not too long; rather, the latter portion is quite rushed, and the story suffers somewhat for it. The story is largely intact, with very little having been diluted or
Okay, well, they have to retrieve FOUR items, not three. That's actually a vital component of the story, so I'm wary that if you missed that, what else you may not have picked up on...
As a huge Sondheim follower, this adaptation is about as good and as strong as any fan could really ever expect. The film is actually not too long; rather, the latter portion is quite rushed, and the story suffers somewhat for it. The story is largely intact, with very little having been diluted or removed...it's quite faithful and, overall, is a more successful interpretation than 2012's "Les Miserables". I'd recommend it, however, a good portion of the general public likely won't understand the subtleties or layers, and even generic musical fans may not get it, as Sondheim's orchestrations and lyrics are challenging and intellectual, with a lot to convey.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
4:56AM on 12/25/2014
It's funny how "James Cordon" and "likeable" always end up in the same sentence isn't it....
It's funny how "James Cordon" and "likeable" always end up in the same sentence isn't it....
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
7:19AM on 12/25/2014
I'd replace "funny" with "baffling".
I'd replace "funny" with "baffling".
-2
9:00PM on 12/24/2014
Give it maybe a 5 for me. Maybe. Saw this for free, thank goodness. I guess it's just not my cup of tea. Maybe someone whose into these kinds of musicals will dig it, but I didn't. Didn't like the music, didn't like care much for the structure of the story, and the only interesting part for me was the third act. Some elements worked okay. The story and the acting were all right, but I really didn't go for the staged look. I realize it's a musical based on broadway, but that doesn't mean
Give it maybe a 5 for me. Maybe. Saw this for free, thank goodness. I guess it's just not my cup of tea. Maybe someone whose into these kinds of musicals will dig it, but I didn't. Didn't like the music, didn't like care much for the structure of the story, and the only interesting part for me was the third act. Some elements worked okay. The story and the acting were all right, but I really didn't go for the staged look. I realize it's a musical based on broadway, but that doesn't mean everything has to look like it was shot on a soundstage.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
6:34PM on 12/24/2014
James Corden is in this movie too? I've got to watch this movie.
James Corden is in this movie too? I've got to watch this movie.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
4:51PM on 12/24/2014

You know how I know your gay?

You're a sucker for musicals :)
You're a sucker for musicals :)
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:24PM on 12/24/2014
Glad to read this got a positive review. I'm a sucker for musicals and the cast for this is terrrific. Excited to see how each cast member does with their singing as well.
Glad to read this got a positive review. I'm a sucker for musicals and the cast for this is terrrific. Excited to see how each cast member does with their singing as well.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting

Movie Hottie Of The Week

More