Producer John Davis on the difficulty of adapting Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles

JoBloJoBlo
Last Updated on July 23, 2021

Given the sprawling text, adapting Ray Bradbury’s THE MARTIAN CHRONICLES to the big screen is a mighty tall ask. One person who knows this more intimately than anyone is producer John Davis, who currently has the film set up at Paramount. Well, Davis spoke with our pals over at Collider and broke down some of the difficulties in turning the series of vignettes into a film. Check it…

When asked about the fidelity of text-to-screen translation, Davis responded with:

“We had a conversation with Ray because I wanted his input and all of that stuff. He basically said, “You can stray because you are going to need to do certain things to make a movie.” I would never do anything that he wasn’t 100 percent on board with. Some people are faithful and some people are interpretive. When you have something like this you basically go out to 2 or 3 writers that you really want to work with and they come back to you and you hear their take. You kind of go, “That is the movie I want to make. That is really cool.” Then we will go back to writing. We will go, “Maybe we will do this and this. And we will tell the story from this perspective.” But you have to be true to a lot of the things that make the book great or be really clever on how you bring them in.”

About the size and scope of the film version, Davis added:

“Yes. I think it should be a big summer movie. If you think of the idea of terraforming a planet and then colonizing it. In reality, it’s a modern western. It was moving to the west. It was all of the people looking for a second chance. Based on what was going on Earth we had to move somewhere. The Martians were there. We thought they were all dead but we found remnants of the world and all of that stuff. It lends itself to a really interesting summer movie and one with a weighty intellectual background.”

I read THE MARTIAN CHRONICLES in college and quite loved it. That being said, faithfully rendering a film version seems a lofty endeavor. I’d love to see it done well, but as is the case with most Bradbury adaptations, I fear it’ll come off inferior to the tome. What says you?

Source: Collider

About the Author

Columnist / Reviewer

Favorite Movies: Horror: Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974), Silence of the Lambs, Jaws, Black read more Christmas (1974), Friday the 13th (1980), Return of the Living Dead, Halloween (1978), Last House on the Left (1973), way too many to list (in the horror genre alone, not to mention out of genre film) Non-Horror: Stand By Me, Lonely Are the Brave, Lost in Translation, Rushmore, Blue Velvet, The Elephant Man, Sling Blade, The Usual Suspects, Reservoir Dogs, Caddyshack, Stripes, Ghostbusters, One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest, Harold and Maude, The Treasure of Sierra Madre, There Will Be Blood, Boogie Nights, Fargo, No Country for Old Men, The Big Lebowski, and on and on and on and mothafu*kin on

Likes: Film, Books, Words, Writing, Rhyming, Football (49ers, Lions), Basketball, Wiffle ball, read more Womens Gymnastics, Movies, Music, Underground hip-hop, Reggae, 50s and 60s R&B, Cinema, Alcohol (vodka, rum, whiskey will do), Beer, John Madden football, Scrabble, Clue, Crossword Puzzles and Word Searches, Horror flicks, Saved by the Bell, Married With Children, Seinfeld, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Entourage, Tales from the Crypt, Motion Pictures, Michelle Pfeiffer, Paul Newman, Jack Nicholson, Ellen Burstyn, Scorsese, the Brothers Coen, Mexican Food, Italian Food, Cats, The Color Green, The Beach.

The comment section exists to allow readers to discuss the article constructively and respectfully, focused on the topic at hand.

What’s Not Allowed

  • Abusive language, insults, or harassment toward other users or staff.
  • Hate speech of any kind is strictly prohibited.
  • Bickering, bullying, personal attacks, or baiting others to argue
  • Extended off-topic debates, especially those centered on politics or religion rather than the article topic
  • No AI content or SPAM