DC Comics reveals The Green Lantern as the first major superhero to be openly gay

JoBloJoBlo

In an industry where killing off characters only to bring them back a few months later is common practice, it is often hard to do something new or unexpected. But, DC Comics held to their promise to reveal that one of their superheroes is gay.

That superhero turned out to be the original Green Lantern, Alan Scott.  (NOTE: In case you didn’t know, the Warner Bros/DC film GREEN LANTERN was Hal Jordan, not Alan Scott)

The change occurs in DC’s Earth 2 universe, which is not their main comic timeline. However, this marks the biggest superhero to come out of the closet in comics history. DC previously released a series featuring a lesbian Batwoman and Marvel recently had two of the X-Men, who are gay, get engaged to be married.

It should be noted that making the Green Lantern gay is not the only other major change to the character. The Earth 2 Alan Scott also doesn’t have a lantern at all! In fact, he derives his power from the green energy of the planet that feeds through his ring, not an intergalactic corps of heroes. Also, he is no longer weakened by wood (which I didn’t even know was a Green Lantern weakness).

Writer James Robinson had this to say about the new Alan Scott/Green Lantern: He’s a giant of the media industry. By getting involved in communication, the news, and the Internet, he’s become a billionaire. He’s kind of a cross between Mark Zuckerberg and David Geffen. The original Alan Scott owned a radio station in the ’40s and ’50s, so he was a media giant then. He was this bold, heroic, brave man who took control, who would risk his life for you and be this emerald knight that was always there to protect the world. The Alan Scott I’m doing now is that same dynamic, brave, honorable man. A man that you’d want guarding your welfare, your children, your life, your home. He’s willing to give his life for the world. He’s everything you want in a hero. And he happens to be gay. So really, apart from his sexuality, there isn’t that much of a difference.

What do you think of this new change in the direction for an established comic icon?

Click the image below to enlarge.

 

Source: The Hollywood Reporter, Entertainment Weekly

About the Author

TV Critic / Columnist
6,413 Articles Published Started writing in 2012

Favorite Movies: Being There, The Shining, The Royal Tenenbaums, Suspiria, Seven, North By read more Northwest, Citizen Kane, The Monster Squad, Begotten, Fight Club, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, Army of Darkness, Children of Men, Blade Runner, The Big Lebowski, Casino, Pi, Dumb and Dumber, The 400 Blows, Small Change, Bonnie & Clyde, Cool Hand Luke, Moulin Rouge, Gangs of New York, Shallow Grave, The Rock, The Incredibles, Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, The Gate, Prince of Darkness, Oldboy, The Dark Knight, The Lord of the Rings, The Tree of Life, The Exorcist III, Midnight Special

Likes: To piss you off, unpopular opinions, the novels of Stephen King, read more obscure bands that even hipsters dont know, things that go boom, Reeses Pieces, Cate Blanchett, reading paper books, watching people falling down, a good jump scare, listening to a full album in one sitting, rooting for the underdog, red band trailers, rare steaks, cool beer labels, smooth whisky, properly proportioned image files, top ten lists, VHS tapes, and actually scary movies

The comment section exists to allow readers to discuss the article constructively and respectfully, focused on the topic at hand.

What’s Not Allowed

  • Abusive language, insults, or harassment toward other users or staff.
  • Hate speech of any kind is strictly prohibited.
  • Bickering, bullying, personal attacks, or baiting others to argue
  • Extended off-topic debates, especially those centered on politics or religion rather than the article topic
  • No AI content or SPAM