Mohawk (Movie Review)

Last Updated on August 2, 2021


THIS REVIEW ORIGINALLY RAN AS PART OF OUR FANTASIA 2017 COVERAGE

PLOT: During the war of 1812, a young Mohawk woman (Kaniehtiio Horn) and her two lovers, a fellow Mohawk, Calvin (Justin Rain) and English Indian agent, Joshua (Eamon Farren) battle a squad of bloodthirsty American soldiers.

REVIEW: Ted Geoghegan is a guy well known among us internet journos. A publicist long associated with the Fantasia Film Festival, he’s also a budding filmmaker, with his first feature, WE ARE STILL HERE, being notably well received and scoring solid distribution – not something easily achieved in the genre indie scene these days. MOHAWK is his sophomore effort, and a change of pace from his relatively straightforward horror first feature.


Described as a home invasion flick with North America the home, and Americans the invaders, MOHAWK is a revisionist period actioner, told with a modern perspective. It’s a strong leap forward for Geoghegan, who’s shot a sharp looking, technically accomplished feature with a pretty low-budget. Often, these types of movies look fine on your TV/devices, but don’t hold up on the big screen. MOHAWK is the exception. It looks great – with strong cinematography by Karim Hussein, who also shot HOBO WITH A SHOTGUN, episodes of “Hannibal”, THE ABC’S OF DEATH and ANTIVIRAL, and also has a memorable synth-score by indie horror go-to guy Wojciech Golczewski.

The overall pace of the film is good, with it running a taut ninety minutes, although I’ll admit to having found the first two thirds, which are more reality based, more interesting than the gore-heavy grand guignol finale. It takes a somewhat predictable detour into horror territory, which is probably a commercial necessity, but also snaps the tension somewhat as I was so invested in the heroes.


The three leads really do exceptional work, with Kaniehtiio Horn, who’s actually Mohawk, making a strong protagonist, as a First Nations woman fully liberated and ready to fight for what’s hers. Justin Rain, as her first nations lover is similarly good, as is Eamon Farren, in a much more heroic role than he’s currently playing on David Lynch’s “Twin Peaks: The Return.”


However, I did have a bit of a problem with the baddies – a ragtag gang of American militia men. With the exception of Noah Segan’s Yancy, none are terribly three dimensional, and a greater sense of conflict between them might have been more interesting. They look more like extras from FURY ROAD than 1812 era soldiers, but again – this keeps it more or a genre flick than an out-and-out drama. There’s certainly an arty version of this movie that could have been made, but this doesn’t aim to be that – and for what it is, Geoghegan and company did a really good job as it’s superior to most festival genre selections I’ve sat through this year (I think it would have been a solid pick for Sundance – whose midnight selection has been noticeably weak lately).

While it remains to be seen what kind of distribution MOHAWK will get, if you come across it I highly recommend it as an example of micro-budget action-horror done with a lot of heart and talent. It’s well worth taking a chance on.

Source: Arrow in the Head

About the Author

Editor-in-Chief - JoBlo

Favorite Movies: Goodfellas, A Clockwork Orange, Boogie Nights, Goldfinger, Casablanca, Scarface (83 version), read more Heat, The Guns of Navarone, The Dirty Dozen, Pulp Fiction, Taxi Driver, Blade Runner, any film noir

Likes: Movies, LP's, James Bond, true hollywood memoirs, The Bret Easton read more Ellis Podcast, every sixties british pop band, every 80s new wave band - in fact just generally all eighties songs, even the really shit ones, and of course, Tom Friggin' Cruise!

The comment section exists to allow readers to discuss the article constructively and respectfully, focused on the topic at hand.

What’s Not Allowed

  • Abusive language, insults, or harassment toward other users or staff.
  • Hate speech of any kind is strictly prohibited.
  • Bickering, bullying, personal attacks, or baiting others to argue
  • Extended off-topic debates, especially those centered on politics or religion rather than the article topic
  • No AI content or SPAM