ARROW IN THE HEAD REVIEWS

001607
Search by title # A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Hellraiser (1987)
Written by: The Arrow
Director: Clive Barker

Starring:
Andrew Robinson/Larry
Clare Higgins/Julia
Ashley Laurence/Kristy
Sean Chapman/Frank
PLOT-CRUNCH
Larry (Robinson) and Julia (Higgins) move in the old family house. What they don’t know is that Larry’s brother Frank is hiding in one of the rooms. He’s just escaped hell’s grasp and is back as an undead, skinless man. Julia (who used to bang Frank and is obsessed with the lad) discovers him and helps him get his body back (by bringing helpless men to the house so Frank can feed on them and rebuild his body). But Frank is not out of the jam yet. Hell’s minions (The Cenobites) are on his arse and they want him back. Toss in a cute girl and a cube puzzle box that opens the gates of heaven or hell and you get one messed up plot!
THE LOWDOWN
Hellraiser is without a doubt an original piece of meat: On one side we have real human drama going on (Julia lusting/killing for Frank, Kristy trying to accept her new mother, Frank being a selfish a-hole, Larry being the good, oblivious husband, trying to have everybody get along). On the other side we have blue demons, a gnarly puzzle box, deadly hooks and a pissed off creature. Take out all the hellish ingredients and this could pass for a British TV drama with shades of SNM.

Adultery, lust, murder, curiosity, pain and pleasure are the main dishes and even though the supernatural elements are presented very strongly, they never drown the core of what’s going on. That’s quite a feat, I still don’t know how Barker pulled it off.

Without a doubt, the strength of the film relies on Julia and Frank’s relationship. It’s when the film focuses on them and their actions that it is at its strongest. The subplot with the bug-eating vagrant also worked. He complements the film’s weird aura and brings everything full circle. I also liked the role the Cenobites play in this flick. Their background players who are there to serve the story, not drive it. This story is about humans, not the history/past of blue demons. It works better this way.

The film’s suspense is in top form with the scenes involving Julia bringing Frank his meat (single, balding, horny men). You feel for these poor chap, all they wanted was a piece of tail but instead they get hammer hits to the head and become Frank lunch. The rest of the film is almost devoid of tension and the finale which is supposed to have you on the edge of your seat, betrays the first hour by going the light show way with some bad visuals (the vanquishing of the Cenobites, the hall demon).

Another bad thang: Why is Kristy’s boyfriend even in the film? The character brings nothing to the story and actually distracted me from some horrific events. The actor that plays him is so damn wooden (the man is not impressed by eyeless, blue demons) that I was too busy cursing at him instead of watching the film. If that dude had been on my set, I would have fired his silly looking arse. I hate lazy actors.

The script lost me a few times: At a certain point Kristy faints and is brought to the hospital. Why is the staff so crude to her? Is fainting a freaking crime? Why do they lock her in her hospital room? Why are they calling the police? Doesn’t make sense to me. Felt like a plot device that ignores logic.

The box itself doesn’t make too much sense either: It’s supposed to open the gates or heaven or hell. Well I guess heaven is a tough combo cause these guys always ring up Lucifer’s pad. The box is supposed to be a mystery but Kristy has no problem figuring it out or using it to vanquish the demons (way too easily).

Barker loses himself a bit in his over ambition and unfortunately the budget is not up for it. The hallway creature is too fake looking (it's so obvious he’s being pushed on a wagon or something), the house fire in the end (what house fire?) is communicated by showing us a few chairs remaining with flames around them. We never see the house burn down (from the outside) and it makes for a weird transition.

Barker should’ve tweaked his script to fit his budget. That hallway demon was supposed to bring suspense to the film but instead it brought me laughter.

Big ambitions + original concept + low budget = uneven film that succeeds and fails half the time. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. I appreciate over ambition way more than heartless filmmaking. Here Barker goes for the gold but gets the silver.
GORE
Gore hounds rejoice. Skinless bodies, hammer hits to the head, head ripped apart by hooks…ugly demons…u crave it? Here it is. Not for the squeamish.
ACTING
Andrew Robinson (Larry) does fine but his character is not too interesting. Clare Higgins (Julia) is a delight and rocks the house. She makes all the weird things happening more credible due to her honest reactions to them. Ashley Laurence (Kristy) is also pretty strong and she deserves special commendation for making out with that skanky dude that plays her boyfriend. She didn’t gag, that’s a sign of a strong thespian. Sean Chapman (Frank) is one hairy dude and that’s all the acting skills he needs. Oliver Smith (Skinless Frank) sometime turns the dialogue into a joke with his poor delivery. NOTE: The chap that plays Kristy’s boyfriend is a wooden mess and he doesn’t even deserve to have his name mentioned. He should be hunted down and torn apart. Another thing: what’s up with his goofy looking plaid shirt??? In addition to being a putrid actor he’s also a fashion criminal.
T & A
A steamy sex scene between Julia and Frank that doesn’t reveal much in terms of key body parts.
DIRECTING
This film smells like a slaughterhouse. You’ll take a shower after seeing it. Barker infuses the film with moments of slick style (When the door of hell opens in the hospital he quick cuts with a rose on TV…brilliant) and has a strong narrative method (loved it when he intercut Julia’s flashback with Larry getting his hand cut on the nail). Barker doesn’t shy away from gore and I’m sure he would have pulled off that hallway demon scene (in term of suspense) if we didn’t see the crew behind the monster pushing it.
SOUNDTRACK
A grandiose gothic score by: Chris Young…amazing….
BOTTOM LINE
Hellraiser is not for everybody. You can’t deny its guts (no puns) or its novel storyline. Barker comments on human nature and at the same time delivers buckets of blood. The script could have been tightened, some of the subplots were not needed (boyfriend!!!), some of the effects are bad, but on a whole this makes for a once in a lifetime kind of viewing. If you’re in the mood for something different and love the red stuff, take a trip down Hellraiser lane. You’ll find your pleasure.
BULL'S EYE
One thing I didn’t know is that the hallway creature is called « The Engineer ». In Part 5, the main villain is also called « The Engineer », I guess it’s supposed to be the same creature….
Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

4:34PM on 08/28/2011
One of my favorites. Bizarre, twisted, gory, and rather cerebral too.
One of my favorites. Bizarre, twisted, gory, and rather cerebral too.
Your Reply:



7:44AM on 10/05/2007

Only because I haven't seen it yet does it get a zero

From what you say in your review, perhaps it WOULD be better if the film were remade. However, as long as it keeps the focus on Julia and Frank, and NOT on Pinhead...he's just one of the Cenobites, and they're all, as previously stated, "(t)here to serve the story, not drive it."

In fact, what if they just pull a Star Wars Special Edition Trilogy on it - add better special effects here and there, cut out (or re-cast and re-edit) the boyfriend scenes, re-release it in theaters, and
From what you say in your review, perhaps it WOULD be better if the film were remade. However, as long as it keeps the focus on Julia and Frank, and NOT on Pinhead...he's just one of the Cenobites, and they're all, as previously stated, "(t)here to serve the story, not drive it."

In fact, what if they just pull a Star Wars Special Edition Trilogy on it - add better special effects here and there, cut out (or re-cast and re-edit) the boyfriend scenes, re-release it in theaters, and budda-bing, you have a new movie. It would cost less, it wouldn't be a remake, AND it would solve all the problems of this flick at once.

Oh, and P.S. - the novella upon which this movie is based, 'The Hellbound Heart,' written by Mr. Barker himself, is one of the weirdest, sickest, and most erotic stories I've ever read.
Your Reply:



1:35AM on 10/23/2006
Personally I love this film. It brought a freshness to horror cinema, and it made Clive Barker a household name for horror-lovers. It has a few flaws (the razzle-dazzle climax for one), but it's not enough to make me dislike anything about the movie. What grabs me about the film in particular, aside from the amazing horror imagery, is the editing. The scene where Larry cuts his hand on the nail while moving the mattress is an amazing montage of tension.
Personally I love this film. It brought a freshness to horror cinema, and it made Clive Barker a household name for horror-lovers. It has a few flaws (the razzle-dazzle climax for one), but it's not enough to make me dislike anything about the movie. What grabs me about the film in particular, aside from the amazing horror imagery, is the editing. The scene where Larry cuts his hand on the nail while moving the mattress is an amazing montage of tension.
Your Reply:



11:03AM on 04/10/2006
Excellent special effects but unfortunately that's all that's really a big deal in this movie. The first 3/4 of the movie are pretty good, nothing really special, but the conclusion is so confusing and slapped together that it really ruins the effect everything previous had developed. And what the hell is with that drifter guy? I don't think that was really necessary...I get what purpose he served but he served it about 45 seconds the entire movie.
Excellent special effects but unfortunately that's all that's really a big deal in this movie. The first 3/4 of the movie are pretty good, nothing really special, but the conclusion is so confusing and slapped together that it really ruins the effect everything previous had developed. And what the hell is with that drifter guy? I don't think that was really necessary...I get what purpose he served but he served it about 45 seconds the entire movie.
Your Reply:



Mistress Of The Week

More
Hudson, Kate