Latest Entertainment News Headlines

Deadpool writers talk sequel, Cable & being the underdog this awards season

01.11.2017
100%

Deadpool 2

I certainly don't need to tell you how much of a success DEADPOOL was, but I think many of us have been surprised to see the film racking up a variety of nominations during the awards season, including nods from the WGA and PGA as well as two nominations at the recent Golden Globe Awards. It's not that the film is bad, it's just that movies like DEADPOOL don't often pick up that kind of attention. Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick, the writers of DEADPOOL, recently spoke with Deadline to discuss the movie, its upcoming sequel and feeling like an underdog during this awards season.

On what it's like to see DEADPOOL getting major awards recognition:

Paul Wernick: It’s really surreal. We’re pinching ourselves. Rhett and I have always wanted to don the tuxedos, and have a prestige play, and who would have thought that this would’ve been it? Self-deprecating, self-loathing anti-hero, who makes makes fart jokes, and swears, and does bad things. The other crazy thing is, how rare is it that a movie that made $783 million is kind of the underdog of the award season? [Laughs] It’s rare that a movie like this, that’s generally considered a popcorn type movie, gets recognized among such serious, great fare. So, it’s both surprising and exciting, and unexpected, and yet, so gratifying.

Rhett Reese: It’s hard to think of it as an underdog next to smaller budgeted movies, but next to the movies it competes with, it kind of was an underdog. It was a low budget studio movie of this kind. It took six years of uphill pushing to get the movie made. It’s R-rated, it’s very meta. It takes a fair amount of chances in the space it’s in, I think, both in the way it’s told, and just the nature of the character. It’s like the little movie that could, except I guess, it’s a big little movie that could. Particularly at this time of year, when you tend to see movies that are sort of classy, and they’re message movies. They tend to have a point, and they tend to make political points, and this just couldn’t be further from.

Where they're at with the DEADPOOL sequel and whether it will still be a stand-alone film:

Rhett Reese: Yeah, it’ll be a solo movie. It’ll be populated with a lot of characters, but it is still Deadpool’s movie, this next one. We’re pushing forward very hard. I think by every account we will shoot it this year, and we’re on our multiple draft now. It’s taken different twists and turns, but it’s really coalescing, and we’re very, very excited. We’re a little nervous, because now we feel like we have to live up to the first movie, but at the same time, we have to have faith, and we have an extreme passion still, and as long as we have passion still, and it’s not a mercenary, venal play, which we don’t think this is, I think we’ll be in good shape.

On whether putting Cable in DEADPOOL's post-credit sequence meant that they assumed they'd be getting a sequel:

Paul Wernick: We were like the athlete who guarantees victory before the game. [Laughs] It’s a world that’s so rich and we always thought Cable should be in the sequel. There was always debate whether to put him in the original, and it felt like we needed to set up Deadpool and create his world first, and then bring those characters into his world in the next one.

Both domestically and world-wide, DEADPOOL is the highest-grossing film in the X-MEN franchise, but so far there aren't any plans for the character to make any appearances in a "proper" X-MEN film, but both Reese and Wernick believe that it wouldn't be too hard to drop him into another movie. Although the rumours of Ryan Reynolds popping up as DEADPOOL in James Mangold's LOGAN were quickly debunked, Reynolds is still hoping to convince Hugh Jackman to strap on the claws one more time for a Deadpool/Wolverine team-up film.

The DEADPOOL sequel is set to hit theaters on January 12, 2018.

CLICK IMAGE TO OPEN GALLERY & SEE MORE PICS...

Source: Deadline

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

7:49PM on 01/11/2017
As great and as much of a game changer Deadpool was and is, I think expectations are going to be too high for the sequel due to the massive, unexpected success of the first one. That and the fact that they'll have to keep the jokes and pop culture references fresh and not redundant.

I'm hoping that it does turn out to be just as good and/or better than the first and depending on who's playing Cable and Domino, I'm sure it will be.
As great and as much of a game changer Deadpool was and is, I think expectations are going to be too high for the sequel due to the massive, unexpected success of the first one. That and the fact that they'll have to keep the jokes and pop culture references fresh and not redundant.

I'm hoping that it does turn out to be just as good and/or better than the first and depending on who's playing Cable and Domino, I'm sure it will be.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
11:38AM on 01/12/2017
Someone asked how Deadpool was a game changer. For starters, it proved that an R-rated superhero movie could be just as massively successful as the others. It proved a movie could have large amounts of 4th-wall breaking and it actually benefit the material rather than come across as a gimmick. It's the first superhero film to be nominated for major awards like Best Picture (Golden Globes and PGA so far). So, yeah, it's a game changer. Because now you will see more r-rated superhero films
Someone asked how Deadpool was a game changer. For starters, it proved that an R-rated superhero movie could be just as massively successful as the others. It proved a movie could have large amounts of 4th-wall breaking and it actually benefit the material rather than come across as a gimmick. It's the first superhero film to be nominated for major awards like Best Picture (Golden Globes and PGA so far). So, yeah, it's a game changer. Because now you will see more r-rated superhero films (Logan), more 4th wall breaking in movies where it fits the story, and more awards consideration for superhero films.

As for what you're saying The_Soloist, I agree about getting our expectations too high. The Darn Knight Rises is not a bad film. It has some big flaws in the story, and no it isn't as good as the two films that came before it. Still it is not a bad film by any means, but it sure was disappointing when going in with the expectations built up for the previous one. Had TDKR been the only film in the franchise to be released it probably would have been hailed as a masterpiece, but when you've got to follow one of the best superhero films ever made, it's just a nearly impossible task to live up in minds of movie-goers.
6:23PM on 01/13/2017
Wow, ok, as usual no one does any research. Batman 1989 was NOT rated R. It was NEVER released with an R rating. Just PG13. Also, I never said there weren't R rated superhero movies before. (interesting you chose to leave out Blade but whatever). Deadpool is the first SUCCESSFUL r rated superhero movie. Watchmen and Kick Ass were not box office successes. And Kingsman is not a superhero film. There.
Wow, ok, as usual no one does any research. Batman 1989 was NOT rated R. It was NEVER released with an R rating. Just PG13. Also, I never said there weren't R rated superhero movies before. (interesting you chose to leave out Blade but whatever). Deadpool is the first SUCCESSFUL r rated superhero movie. Watchmen and Kick Ass were not box office successes. And Kingsman is not a superhero film. There.
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting