Latest Movie News Headlines

Review: Under the Skin

Apr. 4, 2014by: Chris Bumbray

This review of UNDER THE SKIN originally ran as part of our TIFF 2013 coverage.

PLOT: An alien in human form (Scarlett Johansson) roams Scotland, luring men into her nest so they can be consumed. After a while, the realities of having a human body, and being desired, begin to have a strange effect on her.

REVIEW: Having debuted a few weeks ago at the Venice Film Festival, UNDER THE SKIN has already had a divisive reaction from the critics. Some have hailed it a masterpiece, while other have claimed it's meandering and self-indulgent. To be sure, the plot is as thin as they come. Scarlett Johansson is a sexy alien, and the first half of the film is literally nothing but her driving around, picking up horny men, and enticing them back to her nest.

The reason why she needs them is never made clear. Johansson only has a few lines of dialogue, and all of it is used to seduce men (many of whom speak with nearly indecipherable accents). The same sequence is repeated over and over, with men following her into the darkness as she disrobes, only to sink in fluid, in which their insides seem to be consumed and turned into a strange substance she appears to be collecting for a higher power. She seems to be alone on earth, with the exception of a man on a motorcycle who follows her around.

Johansson is intentionally robotic throughout. She doesn't convey any emotion, unless she's with a man, where she tries to be seductive. Apparently director Jonathan Glazer often used a cinema verit style, meaning a lot of the men she meets are non actors. Given the way Johansson looks (and she frequently goes nude) it's not hard to believe they would be more than willing to be lured by her.

The most memorable sequence in the film is when Johansson meets a deformed young man, who seems frightened by her kindness. This episode leads to a somewhat more intriguing second half, as Johansson tries to experience humanity for herself. Don't go in expecting much other than the vaguest of plots.

More than anything, UNDER THE SKIN is an exercise in style for Glazer, who in addition to SEXY BEAST in 2000, also directed the frequently reviled, but underrated BIRTH. His movies are nothing if not inventive, and UNDER THE SKIN is filled with interesting visuals. For the most part, the film is unpolished, having been shot in DV, but there are occasional shots, such as the opening reveal of Johansson's iris, that are astonishing. There's also interesting uses of light and what appear to be in-camera FX, which are accompanied by an extremely memorable, strings-heavy score by experimental composer Micachu.

There's definitely a reason so many critics have been cool towards UNDER THE SKIN. It almost defies you not to like it, and Glazer doesn't seem to be interested at all in adhering to the trappings of the sci-fi horror genre. It's experimental and without a doubt a real art film. Like many other critics I felt it nearly impossible to be drawn into the story, but I appreciate the craft behind it, and can't deny it has a handful of brilliant moments. Whether this will ever be known as something more than the movie where Scarlett Johansson gets naked remains to be seen, but Glazer deserves more consideration than that.

Source: JoBlo.com

Related Articles

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

6:49PM on 04/04/2014
Films like this always remind me of the Joker (Jack Nicholson) looking through Vicky Vale's portfolio,
'Crap.Crap. Crap.Crap. Crap. Now that's good work.'
As I watched it a couple of weeks ago I was thinking yeah its visually and audibly arresting but christ I'll never watch this pretentious bullshit again
Films like this always remind me of the Joker (Jack Nicholson) looking through Vicky Vale's portfolio,
'Crap.Crap. Crap.Crap. Crap. Now that's good work.'
As I watched it a couple of weeks ago I was thinking yeah its visually and audibly arresting but christ I'll never watch this pretentious bullshit again
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
8:42AM on 09/13/2013
Kinda disappointed reading this review. It sounds like this is barely an adaptation of the book by Michel Faber this movie is based off of. It's like Glazer took the bare minimum of the plot, an alien who picks up hitchhikers for some reason, and changed everything else. Johansson wasn't even attractive in the novel but heavily scarred after being altered surgically to look like a human.

The book had a lot of interesting allegories about how we proccess and consume meat that were
Kinda disappointed reading this review. It sounds like this is barely an adaptation of the book by Michel Faber this movie is based off of. It's like Glazer took the bare minimum of the plot, an alien who picks up hitchhikers for some reason, and changed everything else. Johansson wasn't even attractive in the novel but heavily scarred after being altered surgically to look like a human.

The book had a lot of interesting allegories about how we proccess and consume meat that were apparently all lost in the transition from book to movie. What a waste.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
6:15AM on 09/13/2013
"That movie where Scarlett Johannson gets naked" you say..... SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!
"That movie where Scarlett Johannson gets naked" you say..... SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
8:57AM on 09/13/2013
^ This!
^ This!
View All Comments

Latest Movie News Headlines


Top
Loading...
JoBlo's T-Shirt Shoppe | support our site... Wear Our Gear!