Latest Entertainment News Headlines

TV Review: Sherlock - "The Abominable Bride"

01.02.2016

EPISODE: "The Abominable Bride"

SYNOPSISSome things, though, remain reassuringly the same. Friendship, adventure and especially, MURDER...Why is Thomas Ricoletti a little surprised to see his wife dressed in her old wedding gown?  Because, just a few hours before, she took her own life...Mrs Ricoletti's ghost now appears to be prowling the streets with an unslakeable thirst for revenge. From fog-shrouded Limehouse to the bowels of a ruined church, Holmes, Watson and their friends must use all their cunning to combat an enemy seemingly from beyond the grave and the final, shocking truth about...the Abominable Bride!

REVIEW:  If waiting two years since the last new episode of Sherlock was hard enough, this one off special that offers an alternate timeline version of Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman's detectives is equal parts exciting and frustrating. Sidestepping the narrative cliffhanger from 2014's "His Last Vow", this episode takes us back to 19th Century London where Holmes and Watson are a more traditional take on the Sir Arthur Conan Doyle characters. The entire cast of Sherlock gets in on the fun of playing variations of their 21st Century selves. But, then the episode takes a twist that makes you question just which side of the story is real and what is a construct of Holmes' drug-addled mind palace.

Less a true case to be solved by Holmes and Watson but instead an elaborate tease for the upcoming fourth series of Sherlock, "The Abominable Bride" is three stories forced together by series creators and writers Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat. Paying homage to classic Doyle stories like "The Five Orange Pips" and "The Seven -Per-cent Solution", "The Abominable Bride" starts out as an original mystery inspired by a throwaway line in the short story "The Adventure of the Musgrave Ritual". We find our 19th Century Holmes and Watson at the outset of their partnership followed by a fast-forward to the mysterious title case. This version of Holmes is much less manic than Cumberbatch's beloved portrayal and hews much closer to the traditional interpretation of the character. That is where things begin to go awry.

Inspector Lestrade brings Holmes and Watson a case involving a woman who commits suicide only to be found murdering her husband not long after. The case echoes Holmes' own showdown with Jim Moriarty at the end of "The Reichenbach Fall" episode from the second series. Slowly, hints of Moriarty begin to show through the case that features some truly creepy scenes with the ghastly bride as Holmes and Watson try to stop her from killing another person. Seeing the dynamic between Freeman and Cumberbatch in a different time period is interesting but also immediately shows audiences that Sherlock has to be set in the 21st Century lest it lose what makes it so special. It is with that that Moffat and Gatiss throw a curveball into the special.

As 19th Century Holmes injects himself with a solution of cocaine, the show thrusts us onto the jet transporting 21st Century Holmes to his exile from the cliffhanger ending of 2014's "His Last Vow". That's right, the entire case has been a construct of Holmes' memory palace as he tries to deduce how Moriarty could be back from the dead. Watson, Mycroft, and Mary Morstan are all aboard the plane as we learn the special to this point has occurred in the five minute time from the end of the last episode to now. Holmes is confronted by his friends as he admits to having taken a slew of narcotics and other drugs but insists the true case of "The Abominable Bride" will help him figure out how to stop Moriarty's resurrection.

The ninety minute episode begins to go off the rails at this point as the episode heads back into Holmes' 19th Century dream before shooting back to the contemporary setting as it shoots even further back to the historical Holmes' showdown with Moriarty at the actual Reichenbach Falls from the Doyle story. Now knowing that all of this is inside Holmes' head removes any of the tension or stakes to the story. While I will not complain about getting to see more of Andrew Scott chewing the scenery as Moriarty, it doesn't satisfactorily wrap up the title mystery. We are given a brief explanation to how the ghostly bride committed her crime as being the work of a cultish group of women looking for equal rights. The cult is made up of the women wronged over the course of Sherlock's three series run, but it feels like a coupout solution to what started as a cool mystery.

Since first learning about this Sherlock special, it has been teased as a standalone story that existed outside of the series' mythology. After the first half of the episode, I was content to view the story as a fun alternate story to the main timeline, even if it was not wholly satisfying. Surprisingly, the fact that this story does tie into the main narrative feels like the wrong choice as it doesn't work as anything more than a tease until the 2017 premiere of the next trio of mysteries. Compared to the rest of Sherlock to date, this hour was fun but ultimately a placeholder for better stories yet to come. I enjoyed this hour and a half for what it was, but it could have been so much more.

NEXT TIME ON SHERLOCK: Season 4 is slated to air sometime in 2017.

Source: JoBlo.com

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

8:04PM on 01/04/2016
I didn't have a problem with the meta stuff, but I do think it should have been kept till the end. Like you said, the reveal kinda sucks away all the tension and made me less engaged with what the solution was. Also the fake out where Holmes digs up the bride's grave was awesome
I didn't have a problem with the meta stuff, but I do think it should have been kept till the end. Like you said, the reveal kinda sucks away all the tension and made me less engaged with what the solution was. Also the fake out where Holmes digs up the bride's grave was awesome
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
6:53AM on 01/04/2016

Agreed...

There was something "off" about this episode. It had the wrong pace, wrong humor points, wrong feel in general from the previous 9 episodes. It also did NOT definitively answer Moriarty's status. It gave a plausible explanation for how the "bride" would've faked a gun-to-mouth suicide, which I take as a hint that they will allow Sherlock to explain how Moriarty did something similar.
There was something "off" about this episode. It had the wrong pace, wrong humor points, wrong feel in general from the previous 9 episodes. It also did NOT definitively answer Moriarty's status. It gave a plausible explanation for how the "bride" would've faked a gun-to-mouth suicide, which I take as a hint that they will allow Sherlock to explain how Moriarty did something similar.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
10:15PM on 01/02/2016
I dont agree with most of what you said. I had an absolute blast with this episode, it was a great "special" episode to feed our appetite just a tad until season 4 arrives... someday. It was "different" yet very Sherlock-like. And A LOT happened , too. We now know that Moriarity is definitely dead, Mycroft is probably not long for this world (and he knows it), and Sherlock is using again. A very solid tip-off point for season 4, imo.
Sounds like you and others were just upset that this isnt
I dont agree with most of what you said. I had an absolute blast with this episode, it was a great "special" episode to feed our appetite just a tad until season 4 arrives... someday. It was "different" yet very Sherlock-like. And A LOT happened , too. We now know that Moriarity is definitely dead, Mycroft is probably not long for this world (and he knows it), and Sherlock is using again. A very solid tip-off point for season 4, imo.
Sounds like you and others were just upset that this isnt the actual start to a brand new season.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+2
7:40PM on 01/02/2016
I liked it for the most part. By, the fact that you don't cover Doctor Who, made by the same people, is a bit messed up.
I liked it for the most part. By, the fact that you don't cover Doctor Who, made by the same people, is a bit messed up.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
6:49PM on 01/02/2016
Screenrant actual has an article on this accusing them of whitewashing the Victorian era and portraying suffragettes as the KKK.

Jeez they've become pathetic, thank god for JoBlo.
Screenrant actual has an article on this accusing them of whitewashing the Victorian era and portraying suffragettes as the KKK.

Jeez they've become pathetic, thank god for JoBlo.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
11:41PM on 01/02/2016
Well guess Screenrant Sucks then doesn't it.

Well guess Screenrant Sucks then doesn't it.

11:33AM on 01/03/2016
Indeed it does.
Indeed it does.
8:23AM on 01/02/2016
So you're saying the plot to 'abominable bride' is almost the same as Batman: Mystery of The Batwoman?
So you're saying the plot to 'abominable bride' is almost the same as Batman: Mystery of The Batwoman?
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
5:33AM on 01/02/2016
Totally agree, if they had kept it all as a Victorian special and not linked it back to the main story it would have made an interesting standalone case. Now it's just made the bride story a bit redundant in its own rights. As a link to the main story, did it even progress anything? I'm a little confused/forgetful on the events now, is moriarty actually meant to be alive now in the main story?
Totally agree, if they had kept it all as a Victorian special and not linked it back to the main story it would have made an interesting standalone case. Now it's just made the bride story a bit redundant in its own rights. As a link to the main story, did it even progress anything? I'm a little confused/forgetful on the events now, is moriarty actually meant to be alive now in the main story?
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
8:16AM on 01/02/2016
What I took away from it is that Moriarty is definitely dead and a separate group who follow him are making it look like it is him risen from the grave just like the group of women did in the Victorian story. It now allows Sherlock to move forward knowing that it definitely isn't Moriarty. Also, we now know Sherlock is still using while Moffat and Gatiss dropped subtle hints that Mycroft may not be around for too much longer,..
I totally agree though that it should have just stayed in
What I took away from it is that Moriarty is definitely dead and a separate group who follow him are making it look like it is him risen from the grave just like the group of women did in the Victorian story. It now allows Sherlock to move forward knowing that it definitely isn't Moriarty. Also, we now know Sherlock is still using while Moffat and Gatiss dropped subtle hints that Mycroft may not be around for too much longer,..
I totally agree though that it should have just stayed in Victorian times. Was such an engrossing mystery! Reverting back to the present kind of took me out of the story a bit.
Still, was AMAZING to have Sherlock back and I am anticipating Series 4 even more now!!!
9:09AM on 01/02/2016
Ahhh thanks that makes more sense now. I couldn't really remember the end of s3 which was my main issue. Good excuse to watch them all again in anticipation of s4 I suppose ...damn I hate waiting!
Ahhh thanks that makes more sense now. I couldn't really remember the end of s3 which was my main issue. Good excuse to watch them all again in anticipation of s4 I suppose ...damn I hate waiting!
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting

Movie Hottie Of The Week

More