Latest Entertainment News Headlines

X-Men: Days of Future Past led to Universal completely redesigning The Mummy

12.08.2016

The Mummy X-Men: Days of Future Past Sofia Boutella

With so many movies in development at once at any given time, it's only inevitable that certain elements may unintentionally (or not) mimic each other. This happened to be the case when Universal Pictures was developing THE MUMMY, the first of their planned Universal Monsters shared-universe. Originally the Mummy was planned to be male and the production team had arrived at a design which they were pleased with which saw the character as having been born with a skin pigmentation which made him an outcast in ancient Egypt. Alex Kurtzman recently told CinemaBlend that everything changed once he saw the post-credit sequence from X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST.

I was going down that road, and then I saw the end of Days of Future Past. And they had the character that Oscar Isaac wound up playing as a boy, and it was, I kid you not, the exact same design. And I was like, 'Oh, man! That is not good!' And actually it was the catalyst, it was the moment of, 'Okay, not only is this not going to be different enough, Bryan Singer just did it, I definitely don't want to go down that road.' I had had that voice in my head for some time to make it a woman, and that was the moment where, the minute I saw that post-credits scene, I went, 'We have to start over.' I don't want to mess around even remotely with anything that feels familiar or feels like it's been done. I have to go in totally new territory.'

As we know, big changes were made to the character and the role of the Mummy was soon filled by Sofia Boutella (STAR TREK BEYOND). Alex Kurtzman credits the change as being the best thing for THE MUMMY as it let him take a leap which led to new directions he wouldn't have seen otherwise.

In a way it was very helpful to me, because it made me take that leap. And once we took that leap, the story presented itself in such a beautiful way, such a different way. A lot of the decisions, you spend a lot of time talking to people and you think it through as much as you can, but ultimately it comes down to what feels right. And the minute I allowed myself to let the Mummy be Ahmanet, it just felt right. And that's the best way for me to say it.

THE MUMMY will be released on June 9, 2017.

CLICK IMAGE TO OPEN GALLERY & SEE MORE PICS...

Source: CinemaBlend

RECOMMENDED MOVIE NEWS

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

5:54AM on 12/09/2016
Glad they changed it because the boy looks stupid
Glad they changed it because the boy looks stupid
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
11:32PM on 12/08/2016
You can't remake a movie then claim that you are trying to be original. The very existence of this movie is the antithesis of original. But if you're trying to be unique, why not just make him/her look like THE FREAKING MUMMY! That would actually be something unique, something we have't really seen in cinema in decades. Why keep going with these tired "vampire-like" designs?
You can't remake a movie then claim that you are trying to be original. The very existence of this movie is the antithesis of original. But if you're trying to be unique, why not just make him/her look like THE FREAKING MUMMY! That would actually be something unique, something we have't really seen in cinema in decades. Why keep going with these tired "vampire-like" designs?
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:44AM on 12/09/2016
The 90s remake actually stuck pretty close to Imhotep's original design, minus Karlof's distinctive mug. Unless you're talking about the wrapped up monster who mindlessly killed people from the pseudo-sequels, which was Kharis not Imhotep.

When people think of the "classic" mummy they're actually thinking of that later version, not Karloff's. much like how when people think of the "classic" Frankenstein monster, they're actually unknowingly talking about Lugosi's version, not Karloff's.
The 90s remake actually stuck pretty close to Imhotep's original design, minus Karlof's distinctive mug. Unless you're talking about the wrapped up monster who mindlessly killed people from the pseudo-sequels, which was Kharis not Imhotep.

When people think of the "classic" mummy they're actually thinking of that later version, not Karloff's. much like how when people think of the "classic" Frankenstein monster, they're actually unknowingly talking about Lugosi's version, not Karloff's.
10:48PM on 12/08/2016
This movie is gonna be so shit lol
This movie is gonna be so shit lol
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
10:08PM on 12/08/2016
Also reminds me of the Genie from "Arabian Nights."
[link]
Also reminds me of the Genie from "Arabian Nights."
[link]
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
9:18PM on 12/08/2016
Where's the Suicide Squad when you need them?
Where's the Suicide Squad when you need them?
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
8:28PM on 12/08/2016
"I don't want to mess around even remotely with anything that feels familiar or feels like it's been done. I have to go in totally new territory." - So instead of stealing the Mummy design from Days of Future Past Apocalypse design they steal it from Suicide Squad Enchantress design? Brilliant!!!!!! #smh
"I don't want to mess around even remotely with anything that feels familiar or feels like it's been done. I have to go in totally new territory." - So instead of stealing the Mummy design from Days of Future Past Apocalypse design they steal it from Suicide Squad Enchantress design? Brilliant!!!!!! #smh
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
8:18PM on 12/08/2016
"! don't want to mess around even remotely with anything that feels familiar or feels like it's been done. I have to go in totally new territory." - Let me just clarify this: these words were spoken by one of the co-writers of Star Trek Into Darkness, which stole liberally from The Wrath of Khan. This after he rebooted Star Trek in a manner that allowed the franchise to go in a different direction, yet it stayed on a similar path. Different? That's at least new for him.
"! don't want to mess around even remotely with anything that feels familiar or feels like it's been done. I have to go in totally new territory." - Let me just clarify this: these words were spoken by one of the co-writers of Star Trek Into Darkness, which stole liberally from The Wrath of Khan. This after he rebooted Star Trek in a manner that allowed the franchise to go in a different direction, yet it stayed on a similar path. Different? That's at least new for him.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Entertainment News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting