Latest Movie News Headlines

Hulk trailer online!

Mar. 12, 2008by: James Thoo

UPDATE! iFilm has the trailer for all of us non-US citizens.

What a treat! I seem to be one of the only people around who is rooting for this movie and wouldn't you know it, after looking forward to it all day, MTV have done a massive number on me and forbidden that it be seen by anyone outside of America! For all of you lucky sons of bitches who are there, you can check out the exclusive trailer over HERE. Me? Don't worry about me, I'm gonna go watch The Sopranos. Who needs this stupid movie. The only way I'll be interested now is if the movie is about Norton using his Gamma strength to hunt down that hip-hop kid that shot Edward Furlong, since -- oh, who am I kidding I desperately want to see this freaking thing. Tell me about it in the strike-backs. In other news, I hate England.

THE INCREDIBLE HULK is directed by Louis Leterrier (THE TRANSPORTER) and stars Edward Norton, Liv Tyler, Tim Roth and William Hurt. It hits theaters on June 13th.
Extra Tidbit: Today, I've officially been working for JoBlo.com for one year!
Source: MTV

Related Articles

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

7:20PM on 03/17/2008

INCREDIBLE!!!

I'm pleasantly surprised. Not a fan of Leterrier, but I love the HULK character and Norton is the man. Looking forward to it!!!!
I'm pleasantly surprised. Not a fan of Leterrier, but I love the HULK character and Norton is the man. Looking forward to it!!!!
Your Reply:



1:29PM on 03/15/2008
looks amazing! always a fan of Ed Norton. and even if he's 'tempestuous', his involvement in the editing of the film American History X yielded a great movie, so i'm sure he's not going in there without understanding what he's doing. can't wait!
looks amazing! always a fan of Ed Norton. and even if he's 'tempestuous', his involvement in the editing of the film American History X yielded a great movie, so i'm sure he's not going in there without understanding what he's doing. can't wait!
Your Reply:



+0
11:13AM on 03/14/2008
I totally agree with nickdoll about combining stunt work or practical effects and cgi instead of having long CGI heavy sequences. George Romero said the same thing on his commentary for Land of the Dead.
I totally agree with nickdoll about combining stunt work or practical effects and cgi instead of having long CGI heavy sequences. George Romero said the same thing on his commentary for Land of the Dead.
Your Reply:



9:02PM on 03/13/2008
I enjoyed the trailer, as someone who is always down for a potentially good comic book film, and I'll definetly check it out on dvd and MAYBE agree to go see it in the theatre. If you take away the CGI, keep in mind that then there would be the complaint that Hulk isn't proportionate enough to the actual character, which is a hulking (Pun intended) mass of a superhero. I'm not the biggest endorser of remakes, but I call fair game for anyone to pick up the ball dropped by someone else. I
I enjoyed the trailer, as someone who is always down for a potentially good comic book film, and I'll definetly check it out on dvd and MAYBE agree to go see it in the theatre. If you take away the CGI, keep in mind that then there would be the complaint that Hulk isn't proportionate enough to the actual character, which is a hulking (Pun intended) mass of a superhero. I'm not the biggest endorser of remakes, but I call fair game for anyone to pick up the ball dropped by someone else. I didn't dislike Ang Lee's Hulk, but I wasn't on cloud nine either.

Just remember folks, if remakes weren't permitted then we never would have gotten The Maltese Falcon with good ol' Humphrey Bogart.
Your Reply:



5:56PM on 03/13/2008

I was excited but now...

Man, when I heard Edward Nortan was in the film, I was excited for it (even after the stinker that was Ang Lee's HULK).

But the trailer...

looks the same as the last one, even with Nortan.

And the news that tht final battle will be 30 minutes long... God, I'm so tired of overly long, CGI heavy action sequences (Ugh, Transformers and Pirates 3). Give me a short, but awesome sequence with realistic CGI mixed with some good old fashioned stunt work. Don't fake it all, fake only what
Man, when I heard Edward Nortan was in the film, I was excited for it (even after the stinker that was Ang Lee's HULK).

But the trailer...

looks the same as the last one, even with Nortan.

And the news that tht final battle will be 30 minutes long... God, I'm so tired of overly long, CGI heavy action sequences (Ugh, Transformers and Pirates 3). Give me a short, but awesome sequence with realistic CGI mixed with some good old fashioned stunt work. Don't fake it all, fake only what needs to be faked.
Your Reply:



3:45PM on 03/13/2008

Another non-US link

I'm in Canada, so I feel your pain too, my friend. Wish we could view everything here. Fortunately, here's another link for you:

[link]

One of the commenters here was right, though, that the CGI looks better in the HD trailer. So people should watch the ifilm link you've posted. Still, I don't think computers are ready to make a Hulk. Also, the Hulk is a boring character. Why do they keep trying to inflict him on us? More Spider-Man, please.
I'm in Canada, so I feel your pain too, my friend. Wish we could view everything here. Fortunately, here's another link for you:

[link]

One of the commenters here was right, though, that the CGI looks better in the HD trailer. So people should watch the ifilm link you've posted. Still, I don't think computers are ready to make a Hulk. Also, the Hulk is a boring character. Why do they keep trying to inflict him on us? More Spider-Man, please.
Your Reply:



2:33PM on 03/13/2008

LAME COMMENTS

I HATE PEOPLE THAT COMPLAIN ABOUT THE

CGI AND THAT IT COPIED THE MATRIX REV

DUDE! GET A LIFE YOURE THE REASON MOVIES

THAT ARE NOT GOOD ARE IN THEATERS
I HATE PEOPLE THAT COMPLAIN ABOUT THE

CGI AND THAT IT COPIED THE MATRIX REV

DUDE! GET A LIFE YOURE THE REASON MOVIES

THAT ARE NOT GOOD ARE IN THEATERS
Your Reply:



2:30PM on 03/13/2008

IM THERE

THIS MOVIE LOOKS INCREDIBLE BETTER THAN

THE FIRST HOPE IS DELIVERS!
THIS MOVIE LOOKS INCREDIBLE BETTER THAN

THE FIRST HOPE IS DELIVERS!
Your Reply:



+0
2:19PM on 03/13/2008

ANG WHO?

I'm probably gonna' get a lotta' hate for saying this but I'm actually looking forward to this movie more than Iron Man...simply because this movie looks like it gives a sh*t about what it's hyping. Of course, NOTHING beats The Dark Knight (and I mean NOTHING), but if I had to choose between Iron Man and this...I'd choose this. On another note...I don't understand how people can actually refer to Ang Lee's version as a masterpiece. Did you mean a master-piece of sh*t? Seriously....what is it
I'm probably gonna' get a lotta' hate for saying this but I'm actually looking forward to this movie more than Iron Man...simply because this movie looks like it gives a sh*t about what it's hyping. Of course, NOTHING beats The Dark Knight (and I mean NOTHING), but if I had to choose between Iron Man and this...I'd choose this. On another note...I don't understand how people can actually refer to Ang Lee's version as a masterpiece. Did you mean a master-piece of sh*t? Seriously....what is it with Ang Lee's version that even slightly amuses you? Huh?
Your Reply:



+0
2:03PM on 03/13/2008

CGI is ruining it for me

I think this will end up being a more entertaining movie than the Ang Lee film. The plot seems more entertaining with a real drama. Ang Lee's conflict was too existential. I still do not understand what happened with Nick Nolte at the end. However, while I enjoyed the scenes with Ed Norton and am enthused about his role in the film I have to say that the CGI is just ruining for me. My principal complaint with the Ang Lee film is that Hulk looked fakey. This Hulk looks even worse. Like a
I think this will end up being a more entertaining movie than the Ang Lee film. The plot seems more entertaining with a real drama. Ang Lee's conflict was too existential. I still do not understand what happened with Nick Nolte at the end. However, while I enjoyed the scenes with Ed Norton and am enthused about his role in the film I have to say that the CGI is just ruining for me. My principal complaint with the Ang Lee film is that Hulk looked fakey. This Hulk looks even worse. Like a previous poster mentioned it looks like animation as opposed to a living, breathing, character. Hope they fix it before release.
Your Reply:



+0
2:03PM on 03/13/2008

The site

[link] The movie site is up, and too all of those whining about the CGI needing "work" well ya'll gotta see the HD version of the trailer, it really does the CG justice and it really does look better than the Hulk from the first film, watch it, then talk!
[link] The movie site is up, and too all of those whining about the CGI needing "work" well ya'll gotta see the HD version of the trailer, it really does the CG justice and it really does look better than the Hulk from the first film, watch it, then talk!
Your Reply:



1:22PM on 03/13/2008

MEH ....

... trailer just doesn't work for me. It's building towards Hulk's revelation, but I've already seen Hulk in Ang Lee's movie (masterpiece and one of the best superhero movies in recent years).It's also too gloomy, and not too exciting.
... trailer just doesn't work for me. It's building towards Hulk's revelation, but I've already seen Hulk in Ang Lee's movie (masterpiece and one of the best superhero movies in recent years).It's also too gloomy, and not too exciting.
Your Reply:



+0
1:06PM on 03/13/2008

Finally!

I have no complaints about the CGI here. Could've looked better, but then the cast and director will make up the difference for me. Anything is better than Ang Lee's Hulk which while written like an action film, was directed like a comedy (Josh Lucas and Nick Nolte overacting along with Ang Lee framing scenes and transitions like a comic book totally ruined the movie, it became a satire of a comic book instead of a comic book movie).

Norton is a step up from Bana and Hurt is a huge step up
I have no complaints about the CGI here. Could've looked better, but then the cast and director will make up the difference for me. Anything is better than Ang Lee's Hulk which while written like an action film, was directed like a comedy (Josh Lucas and Nick Nolte overacting along with Ang Lee framing scenes and transitions like a comic book totally ruined the movie, it became a satire of a comic book instead of a comic book movie).

Norton is a step up from Bana and Hurt is a huge step up from Sam Elliot.
Your Reply:



12:57PM on 03/13/2008

Just what the world needs

Yet another dark, brooding, troubled superhero movie. As the Wildhearts once sang "And the Bullshit goes on..."
Yet another dark, brooding, troubled superhero movie. As the Wildhearts once sang "And the Bullshit goes on..."
Your Reply:



12:28PM on 03/13/2008

AND READ THIS!!! (EXPLANATION OF UNFINISHED CGI!)

" [We released the trailer quite late because] no shots are finished yet. That’s why we took so long to release the teaser, because unlike the other movies coming out this summer, our main character relies on so much calculation and technique. None of the shots in this trailer are finished shots, but I think it’s decent enough and it shows the audience what we’re going for. There’s a different version of the teaser that will only be shown in movie theatres where you see a close-up of the Hulk’s
" [We released the trailer quite late because] no shots are finished yet. That’s why we took so long to release the teaser, because unlike the other movies coming out this summer, our main character relies on so much calculation and technique. None of the shots in this trailer are finished shots, but I think it’s decent enough and it shows the audience what we’re going for. There’s a different version of the teaser that will only be shown in movie theatres where you see a close-up of the Hulk’s face as he comes out of the darkness and cries to [Betty]. A full close-up, like full-screen. And until we had that shot right I didn’t want to release it. That’s why it took so long for us…I never saw that Superbowl spot [that drew criticism of Ang Lee’s film for showing Hulk unfinished]. I’ve asked for it and they’ve said, “No, no, you don’t want to see that.” (Laughs) Anyway, I would have never allowed anything to come out that I wasn’t happy with."
Your Reply:



12:25PM on 03/13/2008

READ THIS! (NEW INTERVIEW WITH DIRECTOR!)

This sequence is toward the end of the movie. But our final scene, our final battle – unlike a normal movie where the final fight scene is six minutes long, ours is 26 minutes long! So you get 26 minutes of two monsters pummelling each other through New York City, jumping up and down, ripping helicopters from the sky and stuff. You know, lots of green blood on the street, splashed all around. So it’s pretty cool. For me it was one of the most exciting elements of making the movie: ‘I have two
This sequence is toward the end of the movie. But our final scene, our final battle – unlike a normal movie where the final fight scene is six minutes long, ours is 26 minutes long! So you get 26 minutes of two monsters pummelling each other through New York City, jumping up and down, ripping helicopters from the sky and stuff. You know, lots of green blood on the street, splashed all around. So it’s pretty cool. For me it was one of the most exciting elements of making the movie: ‘I have two monsters fighting in New York City, that’s going to be fun.’ You know, how do you come up with fun, original stuff? And you’ve seen just the beginning of the face-off, with the monsters running towards each other — BOOM! — they smash into each other, and then craziness ensues. Some humans try to get out of the way but no, they can’t… there’s a little bit of collateral damage! (Laughs) There’s a bit of a bodycount. Not on account of the Hulk — the Hulk’s a saviour — but Blomsky is ruthless."
Your Reply:



10:53AM on 03/13/2008
I think it's a bold move not using CGI for the Hulk and Abomination but just going old school hand drawn animation.
Oh, it is CGI? Uhm... yeah it looks great.
I'm a huge Edward Norton fan but... no good. Eric Bana was fantastic and even looked like the Bruce from the animated series. Plus the Hulk just looked and felt right. In this one the Hulk looks like a villain.
And all the people who think Ang Lee's Hulk is bad, get it out of your head. Maybe you didn't dig the film personally, but if
I think it's a bold move not using CGI for the Hulk and Abomination but just going old school hand drawn animation.
Oh, it is CGI? Uhm... yeah it looks great.
I'm a huge Edward Norton fan but... no good. Eric Bana was fantastic and even looked like the Bruce from the animated series. Plus the Hulk just looked and felt right. In this one the Hulk looks like a villain.
And all the people who think Ang Lee's Hulk is bad, get it out of your head. Maybe you didn't dig the film personally, but if you're a Hulk fan you really need to get your shit together, watch it again and like it.

I really hope they just botched the trailer and the CGI is not done yet and that the movie is actually gonna rock (like it's predecessor).
Your Reply:



10:45AM on 03/13/2008

Crap Trailer

Damn... I hoped it would be a great Hulk Movie. I heard about Starring Edward Norton, and I was hip with it. But after watching the trailer I´m really sad about, how bad the animation of Hulk is.
Damn... I hoped it would be a great Hulk Movie. I heard about Starring Edward Norton, and I was hip with it. But after watching the trailer I´m really sad about, how bad the animation of Hulk is.
Your Reply:



10:23AM on 03/13/2008

HM!

I've been working in the CG/3D field for almost 16 years. I know what current technology can produce as far as a believable humanoid character. Not sure why these effects studios are having such a hard time creating a character that looks believable.
My observations of the Hulk character:

Much too stiff and rigid
Much too shiny
Not enough translucency in the skin(skin is transparent to a certain degree)

I hope that these are just preview renders or else this is another Gumbyeske Hulk
I've been working in the CG/3D field for almost 16 years. I know what current technology can produce as far as a believable humanoid character. Not sure why these effects studios are having such a hard time creating a character that looks believable.
My observations of the Hulk character:

Much too stiff and rigid
Much too shiny
Not enough translucency in the skin(skin is transparent to a certain degree)

I hope that these are just preview renders or else this is another Gumbyeske Hulk character!
Your Reply:



10:18AM on 03/13/2008
Didn't do a hell of a lot for me, but not bad. Number five on my list after Indiana Jones, Dark Knight, Iron Man and Wall-E.
Didn't do a hell of a lot for me, but not bad. Number five on my list after Indiana Jones, Dark Knight, Iron Man and Wall-E.
Your Reply:



9:50AM on 03/13/2008

Looks better than the Ang Lee film

From what I saw, it's two shades above the Ang Lee pic. I like Eric Bana but Ed Norton really looks like he's gonna go somewhere with this.
The Abomination...well, he looks abominable, so at least they're in keeping with his name.
Not quite what I recall from the comics.
Eh, let it roll. We'll all see if it's good or bad soon enough.
From what I saw, it's two shades above the Ang Lee pic. I like Eric Bana but Ed Norton really looks like he's gonna go somewhere with this.
The Abomination...well, he looks abominable, so at least they're in keeping with his name.
Not quite what I recall from the comics.
Eh, let it roll. We'll all see if it's good or bad soon enough.
Your Reply:



+0
9:37AM on 03/13/2008

Sweet ness !!!!!!!

Can't wait to see this now, its going to rock, I love the look of The Hulk.
Can't wait to see this now, its going to rock, I love the look of The Hulk.
Your Reply:



8:22AM on 03/13/2008
I hope thats not the final stage of the CGI cause it looks crappy as hell. And not on just one or two shots...but the whole thing! Arrrghh..I wanna smash something.
I hope thats not the final stage of the CGI cause it looks crappy as hell. And not on just one or two shots...but the whole thing! Arrrghh..I wanna smash something.
Your Reply:



+0
8:02AM on 03/13/2008

Seems like fun

No bitchiness or tears shed over the CGI (Bah! It looks better than those of I am Legend at least), no pouting and moaning and nit-picking here. All in all, I liked it. It looks like an OK way of killing 2 hours out of my ever-so-exciting life, and, I'll see it when it comes out.
No bitchiness or tears shed over the CGI (Bah! It looks better than those of I am Legend at least), no pouting and moaning and nit-picking here. All in all, I liked it. It looks like an OK way of killing 2 hours out of my ever-so-exciting life, and, I'll see it when it comes out.
Your Reply:



7:19AM on 03/13/2008
i think it looks fantastic.

i enjoyed everything in that trailer and i love edward norton. and im one of the....3% of the population who didnt hate the first one.

and congrats Thoo. yesterday. haha
i think it looks fantastic.

i enjoyed everything in that trailer and i love edward norton. and im one of the....3% of the population who didnt hate the first one.

and congrats Thoo. yesterday. haha
Your Reply:



7:04AM on 03/13/2008
Oh shit: it's opening the same day as THE HAPPENING? Dammit...

...well, the movie still looks exciting, even though THE HAPPENING is to this as what INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL is to every other movie coming out this year, for me.
Oh shit: it's opening the same day as THE HAPPENING? Dammit...

...well, the movie still looks exciting, even though THE HAPPENING is to this as what INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL is to every other movie coming out this year, for me.
Your Reply:



+0
7:05AM on 03/13/2008

The Incredible Beta

My first impression was that the CGI is unfinished.
My first impression was that the CGI is unfinished.
Your Reply:



+0
6:17AM on 03/13/2008
Man, the trailer for the Ang Lee was so much better. This one looked pretty standard.
The helicopter scene looked really bad by the way.
Still looking forward to it though.
Man, the trailer for the Ang Lee was so much better. This one looked pretty standard.
The helicopter scene looked really bad by the way.
Still looking forward to it though.
Your Reply:



6:00AM on 03/13/2008
I don't see how this will be any better or even different from the 'original' version a few years ago...but I guess we can't say til it releases. The trailer didn't even make me slightly eager to see it however :
I don't see how this will be any better or even different from the 'original' version a few years ago...but I guess we can't say til it releases. The trailer didn't even make me slightly eager to see it however :
Your Reply:



+0
5:52AM on 03/13/2008

Hmm

I'm from Sweden and i could see the trailer...weird..had to see it without volume. Stupid irl job, looked pretty cool though.
I'm from Sweden and i could see the trailer...weird..had to see it without volume. Stupid irl job, looked pretty cool though.
Your Reply:



5:33AM on 03/13/2008

Hulk Smash!

This one make me forget Ang Lee even tried to make a Hulk film. I can't wait to see Abomination and Hulk go toe to toe, though I think that this is going to be exposition heavy early on, and let the fists fly later.
This one make me forget Ang Lee even tried to make a Hulk film. I can't wait to see Abomination and Hulk go toe to toe, though I think that this is going to be exposition heavy early on, and let the fists fly later.
Your Reply:



3:22AM on 03/13/2008

I loved it...

It just rocked. That's really all I have to say about it. I'm very excited.
It just rocked. That's really all I have to say about it. I'm very excited.
Your Reply:



3:00AM on 03/13/2008
its been a terrible year for joblo
its been a terrible year for joblo
Your Reply:



+0
2:53AM on 03/13/2008
Hmm...I dunno. I'll reserve judgment until I see the finished product. Could be good, though.
Hmm...I dunno. I'll reserve judgment until I see the finished product. Could be good, though.
Your Reply:



1:12AM on 03/13/2008

I'm remaining optimistic.

This has to be one of the most poorly put together trailers I've seen. It took too long to get to the Hulk reveal.

Despite all that it still looks better than Ang Lee's 50% good / 50% awful Hulk film. I'm still excited based on Norton alone. Also just the thought that Robert Downey Jr. has a cameo is amazing. I've always wanted a connected comic film universe.

Even if the Hulk movie isn't great I still think it'll be dumb fun. It can't be any worse than Nick Nolte, gamma dogs, and the
This has to be one of the most poorly put together trailers I've seen. It took too long to get to the Hulk reveal.

Despite all that it still looks better than Ang Lee's 50% good / 50% awful Hulk film. I'm still excited based on Norton alone. Also just the thought that Robert Downey Jr. has a cameo is amazing. I've always wanted a connected comic film universe.

Even if the Hulk movie isn't great I still think it'll be dumb fun. It can't be any worse than Nick Nolte, gamma dogs, and the Hulk reflecting on the outdoors.
Your Reply:



12:32AM on 03/13/2008

Meh... Norton Rocks, but as the Hulk... I Dunno

We'll just have to wait and see how this one plays out. I thought the build up in the trailer was good, but thatere wasn't enough... I dunno, energy?! I just didn't feel excited, it didn't feel very epic. Also, everyone is right, the CGI needs work.
We'll just have to wait and see how this one plays out. I thought the build up in the trailer was good, but thatere wasn't enough... I dunno, energy?! I just didn't feel excited, it didn't feel very epic. Also, everyone is right, the CGI needs work.
Your Reply:



12:01AM on 03/13/2008
I thought I'd be way more hyped after seeing the trailer, but it just not that impressive. I suspect it gives away too much story and Hulk's unveiling was kind of weak sauce. Why didn't they save the helicopter fall for the movie? I'll still see it.....damnit.
I thought I'd be way more hyped after seeing the trailer, but it just not that impressive. I suspect it gives away too much story and Hulk's unveiling was kind of weak sauce. Why didn't they save the helicopter fall for the movie? I'll still see it.....damnit.
Your Reply:



11:57PM on 03/12/2008
...That and I think Ang Lee's version is really good. That is the main reason I don't care too much.
...That and I think Ang Lee's version is really good. That is the main reason I don't care too much.
Your Reply:



11:55PM on 03/12/2008
I don't really care for Norton, I personally find his style of acting more annoying than good. This looks like more of the same from him. As far as this role goes, he is most definitely a large step down from Eric Bana.

But you know what? I want nothing more than be proven wrong. I love it when that happens. Seriously. Maybe this movie will be amazing and make me like Ed Norton. I would be perfectly OK with that. We'll see.

Not having expectations and being surprised or mildly satisfied
I don't really care for Norton, I personally find his style of acting more annoying than good. This looks like more of the same from him. As far as this role goes, he is most definitely a large step down from Eric Bana.

But you know what? I want nothing more than be proven wrong. I love it when that happens. Seriously. Maybe this movie will be amazing and make me like Ed Norton. I would be perfectly OK with that. We'll see.

Not having expectations and being surprised or mildly satisfied is better than hyping something only to have it blow.
Your Reply:



11:34PM on 03/12/2008
The trailer looked awesome and I will probably watch it 10 or 20 more times tonight. People shouldn't be bashing the trailer because obviously the first trailer isn't going to reveal many things, it just tries to get your interest. In this case it passes with flying colors.

I was a little iffy at first when I heard Norton was starring in it because even though he is my second favorite actor, I didn't think that this would be his type of movie. After seeing the trailer and hard work by
The trailer looked awesome and I will probably watch it 10 or 20 more times tonight. People shouldn't be bashing the trailer because obviously the first trailer isn't going to reveal many things, it just tries to get your interest. In this case it passes with flying colors.

I was a little iffy at first when I heard Norton was starring in it because even though he is my second favorite actor, I didn't think that this would be his type of movie. After seeing the trailer and hard work by Norton and crew (mostly Norton) you can obviously tell that this Hulk movie will be better than the first one (I also enjoyed the first one).

Seriously I wish this movie was opening in theaters this weekend. I am so stoked, pumped, and excited for this movie it's not even funny. This summer is going to be awesome for movies.

Even though I had The Dark Knight as my most anticipated movie, it is now a 3-way tie between The Dark Knight, Iron Man, and The Incredible Hulk.

By the way rasporange pant, I love how you just totally rip Edward Norton. I mean obviously you're interested in the movie because other wise why would you bother to even post about the movie. Edward Norton is one of the best, most underrated actors out there today and you know it.

In Norton I Trust.
Your Reply:



10:52PM on 03/12/2008
...Really? This only makes me appreciate Ang Lee's version more. I didn't expect anything from this trailer and I got less than that. This'll probably suck balls and then we'll have a reboot of this reboot in 2012. That shot of him falling from the chopper is terrible.

I'll see it for Liv Tyler, William Hurt, and Tim Roth.

Fuck Edward Norton.
...Really? This only makes me appreciate Ang Lee's version more. I didn't expect anything from this trailer and I got less than that. This'll probably suck balls and then we'll have a reboot of this reboot in 2012. That shot of him falling from the chopper is terrible.

I'll see it for Liv Tyler, William Hurt, and Tim Roth.

Fuck Edward Norton.
Your Reply:



10:09PM on 03/12/2008
I loved the Hulk CGI, Bana in the role, and Danny Elfman's score in Ang Lee's movie, but otherwise I agree that it was a dud. I wasn't completely blown away by the trailer, but I'm not disappointed. The effects don't seem quite up to par with the first movie and even have a "Van Helsing" feel to them, but they seem decent for an early look. Another trailer will have to reveal more. I'll probably see the movie.
I loved the Hulk CGI, Bana in the role, and Danny Elfman's score in Ang Lee's movie, but otherwise I agree that it was a dud. I wasn't completely blown away by the trailer, but I'm not disappointed. The effects don't seem quite up to par with the first movie and even have a "Van Helsing" feel to them, but they seem decent for an early look. Another trailer will have to reveal more. I'll probably see the movie.
Your Reply:



+0
10:04PM on 03/12/2008
It seems to early to have another Hulk film. I still have painful memories of the last one.
It seems to early to have another Hulk film. I still have painful memories of the last one.
Your Reply:



10:04PM on 03/12/2008

give it a chance

i actually think that the trailer looked pretty damn good. you guys who are bashing it need to remember back to the first Iron Man trailer we were given, it looked just as "sloppy" if not more then this trailer. i like the look of Hulk, i just don't like the long hair. overall, it's not going to be as monumental as the bats or iron man but it's going to lend a helping hand to the success of the comic book movies this summer. i'm stoked.
i actually think that the trailer looked pretty damn good. you guys who are bashing it need to remember back to the first Iron Man trailer we were given, it looked just as "sloppy" if not more then this trailer. i like the look of Hulk, i just don't like the long hair. overall, it's not going to be as monumental as the bats or iron man but it's going to lend a helping hand to the success of the comic book movies this summer. i'm stoked.
Your Reply:



9:59PM on 03/12/2008
I still don't know what to make of this movie, although I'm really excited by its potential. Enjoyed the trailer and will definitely be there opening day, but Ang Lee's version is a guilty pleasure. I really feel like they are holding A LOT back, which is a good thing. Here's hoping it fixes most of the first one's short comings
I still don't know what to make of this movie, although I'm really excited by its potential. Enjoyed the trailer and will definitely be there opening day, but Ang Lee's version is a guilty pleasure. I really feel like they are holding A LOT back, which is a good thing. Here's hoping it fixes most of the first one's short comings
Your Reply:



9:57PM on 03/12/2008

To John Locke

I wasn't comparing this movie to any of those movies. I said that it simply looked good enough to sit beside them and help make this a good year for comic book movies. It looks good, at least to me. And I don't think it will be bigger than Iron Man and I know it won't top TDK. I just believe it looks pretty solid and I see no reason why it can't be up there with those movies, if not in box office, but hopefully quality. And I never mentioned Indy 4.
I wasn't comparing this movie to any of those movies. I said that it simply looked good enough to sit beside them and help make this a good year for comic book movies. It looks good, at least to me. And I don't think it will be bigger than Iron Man and I know it won't top TDK. I just believe it looks pretty solid and I see no reason why it can't be up there with those movies, if not in box office, but hopefully quality. And I never mentioned Indy 4.
Your Reply:



9:53PM on 03/12/2008
Congratulations James on your one year anniversary at Joblo!
I for one really dug the trailer. I think the CGI looks fine if not great. Abomination definitely looks cooler than Hulk, but that is because the filmmakers can have more leeway with his design without fanboys getting their panties in a bunch. The Hulk pretty much has to stay the same. Big, green, muscular, purple pants, human-like. He's just not that interesting looking a monster compared to something out of Hellboy or Pirates. But
Congratulations James on your one year anniversary at Joblo!
I for one really dug the trailer. I think the CGI looks fine if not great. Abomination definitely looks cooler than Hulk, but that is because the filmmakers can have more leeway with his design without fanboys getting their panties in a bunch. The Hulk pretty much has to stay the same. Big, green, muscular, purple pants, human-like. He's just not that interesting looking a monster compared to something out of Hellboy or Pirates. But I dig, I think the CGI here is just as good as the CGI in the Iron Man trailer. It's just more difficult to do a human than a robot, and besides, that final shot in the Iron Man trailer where he is walking away and the tank blows up? The CGI on the suit is kind of weak...
Your Reply:



9:27PM on 03/12/2008
The Hulk looks like a toy. I think that the CGI is worse than Ang Lee's Hulk. What the hell are these people thinking when they spend so much money on a movie and produce such piss poor effects! Sad! I was looking forward to being blown away by the new Hulk and I must say that it is very disappointing!
The Hulk looks like a toy. I think that the CGI is worse than Ang Lee's Hulk. What the hell are these people thinking when they spend so much money on a movie and produce such piss poor effects! Sad! I was looking forward to being blown away by the new Hulk and I must say that it is very disappointing!
Your Reply:



9:05PM on 03/12/2008

Hmm

You know what? Ang lee's version, from what I remember looks just as good as this, especially the CGI. Hopefully this film will be much more FUN!Hell it better be, but I think they gave away too much on the trailer...unless maybe it has some pretty cool plot twist that we don't know about. As for Norton, he is ok, he is a great actor, but for some reason man...I'm missing BANA. But oh well, I still want to see it, hopefully it will be great.
You know what? Ang lee's version, from what I remember looks just as good as this, especially the CGI. Hopefully this film will be much more FUN!Hell it better be, but I think they gave away too much on the trailer...unless maybe it has some pretty cool plot twist that we don't know about. As for Norton, he is ok, he is a great actor, but for some reason man...I'm missing BANA. But oh well, I still want to see it, hopefully it will be great.
Your Reply:



9:05PM on 03/12/2008

Hmm

You know what? Ang lee's version, from what I remember looks just as good as this, especially the CGI. Hopefully this film will be much more FUN!Hell it better be, but I think they gave away too much on the trailer...unless maybe it has some pretty cool plot twist that we don't know about. As for Norton, he is ok, he is a great actor, but for some reason man...I'm missing BANA. But oh well, I still want to see it, hopefully it will be great.
You know what? Ang lee's version, from what I remember looks just as good as this, especially the CGI. Hopefully this film will be much more FUN!Hell it better be, but I think they gave away too much on the trailer...unless maybe it has some pretty cool plot twist that we don't know about. As for Norton, he is ok, he is a great actor, but for some reason man...I'm missing BANA. But oh well, I still want to see it, hopefully it will be great.
Your Reply:



8:31PM on 03/12/2008

UGH!

The CGI looks WORSE this time around, and the Hulk's face looks nothing like Norton. With Bana's film, there was at least SOME resemblance . . . and the directing looks generic. Say what you want about Ang Lee's film, but at least he made it stand out.
The CGI looks WORSE this time around, and the Hulk's face looks nothing like Norton. With Bana's film, there was at least SOME resemblance . . . and the directing looks generic. Say what you want about Ang Lee's film, but at least he made it stand out.
Your Reply:



8:31PM on 03/12/2008
notice the hulk is just as tall as the last one... will people complain like the last film, probably not
notice the hulk is just as tall as the last one... will people complain like the last film, probably not
Your Reply:



8:18PM on 03/12/2008

forbidden?

doubleposting (sorry...)
doubleposting (sorry...)
Your Reply:



8:14PM on 03/12/2008

forbidden?

i thought england is in the US ... (little joke from germany) ;)

the trailer looks good. not great - but good.

and: (please dont shoot me) i loved the ang lee HULK ;) maybe a little bit to "green" ;)
i thought england is in the US ... (little joke from germany) ;)

the trailer looks good. not great - but good.

and: (please dont shoot me) i loved the ang lee HULK ;) maybe a little bit to "green" ;)
Your Reply:



8:14PM on 03/12/2008
Don't agree with most of the CGI complaints here, but this trailer doesn't get me as pumped as say, the trailers for Iron Man.
As for Norton, i love the guy so i'm sure he'll be great, it's just odd that every time we hear him, he sounds more relaxed and in control than stressed and about to lose it.
Don't agree with most of the CGI complaints here, but this trailer doesn't get me as pumped as say, the trailers for Iron Man.
As for Norton, i love the guy so i'm sure he'll be great, it's just odd that every time we hear him, he sounds more relaxed and in control than stressed and about to lose it.
Your Reply:



8:04PM on 03/12/2008
Ehhhhh... I'm digging the trailer a little bit, but there's no mystery to it. It pretty much gives away the whole movie... Norton is the Hulk, government wants the Hulk, government creates their own version of the Hulk, their version goes batshit, the Hulk saves the day. Boring.

That said, I actually like Norton in the role, but I do agree that he looks nothing like the final version of the Hulk. Besides that, everything about this movie looks better than Ang Lee's snoozefest.

This
Ehhhhh... I'm digging the trailer a little bit, but there's no mystery to it. It pretty much gives away the whole movie... Norton is the Hulk, government wants the Hulk, government creates their own version of the Hulk, their version goes batshit, the Hulk saves the day. Boring.

That said, I actually like Norton in the role, but I do agree that he looks nothing like the final version of the Hulk. Besides that, everything about this movie looks better than Ang Lee's snoozefest.

This definitely isn't on the same level with Dark Knight, Indy 4, Iron Man, or even Hellboy 2... I probably won't be spending my money on it.
Your Reply:



8:02PM on 03/12/2008

looks good

looks alot better tan the first one!
looks alot better tan the first one!
Your Reply:



+0
7:55PM on 03/12/2008

holy fuck

This looks like it could be better than Ang's flick, I like that they gave Hulk a well known villain (Abomination) this time, who by the way looks pretty bad-ass, that scene at the end was sooo tight! I also love the new retro look of the film, now we need to see some poster art! I agree with most about the cartoonish GCI but this maybe still the first stages of it, but still looks pretty cool, I really can't wait!
This looks like it could be better than Ang's flick, I like that they gave Hulk a well known villain (Abomination) this time, who by the way looks pretty bad-ass, that scene at the end was sooo tight! I also love the new retro look of the film, now we need to see some poster art! I agree with most about the cartoonish GCI but this maybe still the first stages of it, but still looks pretty cool, I really can't wait!
Your Reply:



7:52PM on 03/12/2008
well now i don't even need to see the movie. good effects i think. roth and abomination perfect but man does ed norton look out of place. i mean when you see the hulk it's like he must have landed on norton or something cause there's no way he could have transformed into that. definitley Bana was better. they needed him out and Ang Lee gone that was all in my opinion.
Good trailer.
well now i don't even need to see the movie. good effects i think. roth and abomination perfect but man does ed norton look out of place. i mean when you see the hulk it's like he must have landed on norton or something cause there's no way he could have transformed into that. definitley Bana was better. they needed him out and Ang Lee gone that was all in my opinion.
Good trailer.
Your Reply:



+0
7:51PM on 03/12/2008
Your Reply:



7:49PM on 03/12/2008

Director not dictator

Directors aren't dictators. That's old Hollywood. Prod companies, big name stars, writers, etc. all work together--film is a collaborative event, especially when you've given your lead carte blanche with the script, which further blurs the lines between [link] And they need Norton--his name, his clout, etc.--behind this film. The point is to revive a dying franchise. Hence, he was brought in and given power--power that he deserves. All of the films on which he may have been called "diva"
Directors aren't dictators. That's old Hollywood. Prod companies, big name stars, writers, etc. all work together--film is a collaborative event, especially when you've given your lead carte blanche with the script, which further blurs the lines between [link] And they need Norton--his name, his clout, etc.--behind this film. The point is to revive a dying franchise. Hence, he was brought in and given power--power that he deserves. All of the films on which he may have been called "diva" were better films after his collaboration. I say he's earned his arrogance and his good name.

Regarding the trailer: it's interesting to note the pervasive darkness here, and I like the idea of foregrounding a plot line instead of only highlighting the Hulk. Some good hook lines, too.

Your Reply:



7:38PM on 03/12/2008

The CGI must be better....

...cause the budget of the movie is $130 million!
...cause the budget of the movie is $130 million!
Your Reply:



7:33PM on 03/12/2008

Rushed!

The movie looks terrific but I honestly think that the trailer looks like it was rushed. The CGI is still miles from being complete for sure but we're still a few months away so a lot can change.
The movie looks terrific but I honestly think that the trailer looks like it was rushed. The CGI is still miles from being complete for sure but we're still a few months away so a lot can change.
Your Reply:



+0
7:24PM on 03/12/2008

well let me say

Bana > Norton for this role, and i think everyone is going to end up agreeing the other one wasnt so bad when they see this one. Hoe exactly did that Hulk look much bette?
Bana > Norton for this role, and i think everyone is going to end up agreeing the other one wasnt so bad when they see this one. Hoe exactly did that Hulk look much bette?
Your Reply:



7:23PM on 03/12/2008

ehhh

Let me start off by saying that the Incredible Hulk will see decent success, and is NOWHERE near the indiana jones, dark knight, iron man trifecta that is this summer's blockbusters. Those are 3 epic fucking movies.. and the hulk just looks like it will be forgotten after this year. I'm sick of hearing that the hulk is "this summer's best movie" or "its up there with the dark knight and indiana jones!" no.. its not.

And that CGI is somewhat embarassing. Knowing that you're making a HULK
Let me start off by saying that the Incredible Hulk will see decent success, and is NOWHERE near the indiana jones, dark knight, iron man trifecta that is this summer's blockbusters. Those are 3 epic fucking movies.. and the hulk just looks like it will be forgotten after this year. I'm sick of hearing that the hulk is "this summer's best movie" or "its up there with the dark knight and indiana jones!" no.. its not.

And that CGI is somewhat embarassing. Knowing that you're making a HULK movie makes you realize two very central things. The entire main character will be CGI, and so will the focus villain. That beig said couldn't they try a bit harder to get some realistic effects? Abomination running looks like a video game character.. he has no human motion... at all. At least do some kind of Gollum/King Kong kind of effects.. mirror the actor's motions.
And that Hulk looks identical to the older one.. I'm all for a hulk movie, but this dissapointed me.
Your Reply:



7:19PM on 03/12/2008

oooo

I'm lovin the shit out of it! It looks damn good. I love the Hulk design. I myself am a huge fan of Ang Lee's Hulk as well and this looks very different, but good as well. *crosses fingers*
I'm lovin the shit out of it! It looks damn good. I love the Hulk design. I myself am a huge fan of Ang Lee's Hulk as well and this looks very different, but good as well. *crosses fingers*
Your Reply:



+0
7:15PM on 03/12/2008
Someone get the thing on youtube so us foreigners can watch the damn thing!
Someone get the thing on youtube so us foreigners can watch the damn thing!
Your Reply:



7:14PM on 03/12/2008
i dont know how i feel. i mean the last minute of the trailer is just a scene. kinda gay..
i dont know how i feel. i mean the last minute of the trailer is just a scene. kinda gay..
Your Reply:



+0
7:09PM on 03/12/2008

We'll see

Being a huge fan of the Ang Lee film (Yeah all 8 of us), I am pretty sure I won't enjoy this one as much, but I will still be there opening night. I too have faith in the cast.
Being a huge fan of the Ang Lee film (Yeah all 8 of us), I am pretty sure I won't enjoy this one as much, but I will still be there opening night. I too have faith in the cast.
Your Reply:



7:09PM on 03/12/2008
this is such absolute wank. the idea of the interent was to connect every computer in the world now whenever i try to watch new trailer the freshest it comes up saying it's not available in your area. what is the point of that exactly? they walways say copyright and legal issues. why not just put it up for the whole world create more publicity no? this bullshit. what is anyone going to do with that trailer? oh no! it'll make me want to see th movie more. fucking crap. i gott wait for someone to
this is such absolute wank. the idea of the interent was to connect every computer in the world now whenever i try to watch new trailer the freshest it comes up saying it's not available in your area. what is the point of that exactly? they walways say copyright and legal issues. why not just put it up for the whole world create more publicity no? this bullshit. what is anyone going to do with that trailer? oh no! it'll make me want to see th movie more. fucking crap. i gott wait for someone to put it up on youtube and meanwhile read all the comment people have left calling it amazing. this is such an absolute load. i shall wait like the paitient little sheep i am though.
Your Reply:



7:07PM on 03/12/2008

For those outside the US

[link]

Don't say I never give you anything hombres!!
[link]

Don't say I never give you anything hombres!!
Your Reply:



7:01PM on 03/12/2008

Hello

I have faith in the Norton. However whats with the dim lighting and the typical choir music during battle??? More Hulk less plot would have been nice and MTV next time make sure we can see it bigger in your player.
I have faith in the Norton. However whats with the dim lighting and the typical choir music during battle??? More Hulk less plot would have been nice and MTV next time make sure we can see it bigger in your player.
Your Reply:



6:55PM on 03/12/2008

GAH

THAT FUCKING FONT!!!
FUCK!
JUST KEEP USING THE SAME FONT FOR EVERY FUCKING ACTION MOVIE!
...DAMNIT!



other then that, looks pretty dice.
THAT FUCKING FONT!!!
FUCK!
JUST KEEP USING THE SAME FONT FOR EVERY FUCKING ACTION MOVIE!
...DAMNIT!



other then that, looks pretty dice.
Your Reply:



6:52PM on 03/12/2008

Odd Trailer Pacing

Yeah, something did feel off about that trailer. I wasn't as psyched as I thought I would be but I still have faith in Norton!
Yeah, something did feel off about that trailer. I wasn't as psyched as I thought I would be but I still have faith in Norton!
Your Reply:



6:51PM on 03/12/2008

Okay, I watched it again.

I'm gonna give it the benefit of the doubt. It's difficult to tell from the teaser, but the Hulk CGI doesn't look horrible. That said, it doesn't immediately look better than the previous Hulk CGI, which was pretty damn good even if you hated the movie.
His face seems to have more detailed features, which is interesting.

But I feel like I just saw most of the movie in that trailer... and a good half of it I had already seen five years ago.

It was in a movie called "Hulk"... Anyone
I'm gonna give it the benefit of the doubt. It's difficult to tell from the teaser, but the Hulk CGI doesn't look horrible. That said, it doesn't immediately look better than the previous Hulk CGI, which was pretty damn good even if you hated the movie.
His face seems to have more detailed features, which is interesting.

But I feel like I just saw most of the movie in that trailer... and a good half of it I had already seen five years ago.

It was in a movie called "Hulk"... Anyone remember that one?
Your Reply:



6:47PM on 03/12/2008

huh

What a strange trailer. The movie LOOKS good, but I'm surprised by what they showed for the first trailer -- half of it seems to be a bunch of scenes from the third act climax. No real sense of pace or teasing, they just kind of... put it out there.
What a strange trailer. The movie LOOKS good, but I'm surprised by what they showed for the first trailer -- half of it seems to be a bunch of scenes from the third act climax. No real sense of pace or teasing, they just kind of... put it out there.
Your Reply:



6:47PM on 03/12/2008

Oh holy hell

Yes. Yes. Yes. Awesome. Could this be the best year for comic book movies? Hulk looks awesome. Iron Man looks Awesome. And The Dark Knight. . .need I say more? This trailer was very good and Norton looks like he did a fine job.
Yes. Yes. Yes. Awesome. Could this be the best year for comic book movies? Hulk looks awesome. Iron Man looks Awesome. And The Dark Knight. . .need I say more? This trailer was very good and Norton looks like he did a fine job.
Your Reply:



6:47PM on 03/12/2008

I've gotta watch that again

Didn't look like shit, but I wasn't super psyched either...Tim Roth is the best, most evil looking villain EVER. The effects? Not bad...let me watch it again...
Didn't look like shit, but I wasn't super psyched either...Tim Roth is the best, most evil looking villain EVER. The effects? Not bad...let me watch it again...
Your Reply:



+0
6:46PM on 03/12/2008
Why must they restrict content so that users outside the US can't see it :(
Why must they restrict content so that users outside the US can't see it :(
Your Reply: