Chronicle screenwriter Max Landis voices why he thinks Man of Steel gets Superman wrong

JoBloJoBlo

Max Landis is a nerd. He loves comic books and superheroes and knows about the characters as well as anybody. He is also a screenwriter who has written in the genre (the excellent CHRONICLE) and knows how Hollywood works as well as anybody. His father, John Landis, raised him in the industry. While is opinion is just that, an opinion, he gives a very well thought out answer regarding why he thinks MAN OF STEEL is not a good Superman movie. He equally weighs both his nerd credibility as well as his Hollywood acumen in one of the most spot-on perspectives I have seen in a long time.

I did enjoy MAN OF STEEL when I saw it, but the further I get away from viewing it, the more the backlash against the film begins to make sense. While I am able to enjoy MAN OF STEEL for what it was, I can understand the fans who disagree with the final act of the film and what it does to the character’s new origin and the future of the series.

This ten minute video contains massive spoilers and NSFW language regarding MAN OF STEEL, but if you have seen the movie, you really should watch this. The parallels between MAN OF STEEL AND TRANSFORMERS did occur to me when I saw the movie, but Landis explains it better than I ever could.

Here is my favorite excerpt from the video:

“I guess what I’m saying isn’t so much an opinion on the Man of Steel. It’s more about the way superhero movies have become… at the end of all of these movies, all I’m seeing is fire and death. And that confuses the living shit out of me, because everybody’s going to these movies and they’re all making so much money. And at the end, a hero stands tall as all of society crumbles behind him. That isn’t a superhero to me, a guy who stands there when everyone else is dead. That’s like a rock star. I don’t want to see movies about rock stars. Put the hero back in the super hero movies, because I think ‘super’ might have taken over.”

As a movie, I enjoyed MAN OF STEEL. As a superhero movie, it does feel very similar to THE AVENGERS. But, as my colleague Paul Shirey said so eloquently in his latest C’Mon Hollywood, the destruction is getting a bit much.

Source: Cinema Blend

About the Author

TV Critic / Columnist
6,343 Articles Published Started writing in 2012

Favorite Movies: Being There, The Shining, The Royal Tenenbaums, Suspiria, Seven, North By read more Northwest, Citizen Kane, The Monster Squad, Begotten, Fight Club, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, Army of Darkness, Children of Men, Blade Runner, The Big Lebowski, Casino, Pi, Dumb and Dumber, The 400 Blows, Small Change, Bonnie & Clyde, Cool Hand Luke, Moulin Rouge, Gangs of New York, Shallow Grave, The Rock, The Incredibles, Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, The Gate, Prince of Darkness, Oldboy, The Dark Knight, The Lord of the Rings, The Tree of Life, The Exorcist III, Midnight Special

Likes: To piss you off, unpopular opinions, the novels of Stephen King, read more obscure bands that even hipsters dont know, things that go boom, Reeses Pieces, Cate Blanchett, reading paper books, watching people falling down, a good jump scare, listening to a full album in one sitting, rooting for the underdog, red band trailers, rare steaks, cool beer labels, smooth whisky, properly proportioned image files, top ten lists, VHS tapes, and actually scary movies

The comment section exists to allow readers to discuss the article constructively and respectfully, focused on the topic at hand.

What’s Not Allowed

  • Abusive language, insults, or harassment toward other users or staff.
  • Hate speech of any kind is strictly prohibited.
  • Bickering, bullying, personal attacks, or baiting others to argue
  • Extended off-topic debates, especially those centered on politics or religion rather than the article topic
  • No AI content or SPAM