Latest Movie News Headlines

Review: Maleficent

Maleficent
May. 29, 2014by:
6 10

PLOT: Disney's "Sleeping Beauty" reimagined, with a focus on villainess Maleficent, who curses baby Aurora to a dastardly fate only to regret the decision once she becomes her guardian and surrogate mother.

REVIEW: With MALEFICENT, Disney takes most of the bite out of "Sleeping Beauty" in order to turn it into a treacly fantasy about maternal love and female empowerment. There's nothing wrong with those themes, of course, but this defanging ultimately turns a movie that has more than a few compelling moments of edgy darkness into something more predictably palatable for the whole family. It's probably too much to ask Disney to be subversive, but they have all the goods here and they end up just missing the mark.

The "goods" are actually embodied by Angelina Jolie, who was born to play a wicked witch. It has been ages since I've actually seen her on the big screen (seriously, what the hell was the last movie she was in?) and in that time I've forgotten what an alluring presence she can be. In MALEFICENT's best scenes, Jolie overpowers the entirety of the CG world around her, her intoxicating eyes the only visual effect the movie requires. If the film had allowed the character to be sinister, Jolie would be turning a classic character into her own - it would be unforgettable. But that's not the case.

No, MALEFICENT reimagines the "Sleeping Beauty" tale and its villain to such a degree that we're only really privy to Jolie playing up Maleficent's wicked side for less than a 1/4 of the running time. Screenwriter Linda Woolverton has given Maleficent a backstory filled with anger and sorrow, a tender, motherly side and an opponent who is 100 times worse than she is. In other words, Maleficent has been turned into the most unlikely Disney Princess ever.

After a prologue that sees Maleficent as a young, winged fairy who falls in love with a peasant named Stefan, we become aware of the reason for her transformation into vengeful baddie: Stefan, now an adult and thirsting after the the throne, drugs her and cuts off her wings in a display of loyalty to the king. Years later, Maleficent crashes King Stefan's celebration of his baby girl's birth and curses the child to fall into a deathlike sleep on her 16th birthday. The father has the baby, named Aurora, sent away to live in the woods with a trio of silly fairies, while Maleficent bides her time and watches over Aurora as she grows.

But Maleficent's watchfulness unexpectedly turns her into a guardian; now a teenager (played by Elle Fanning, perfectly acceptable), Aurora encounters Maleficent and befriends her, spending most of her days playing amidst the goofy forest creatures and CG splendor while Maleficent's stoney heart gradually softens. Maleficent realizes her mistake and tries to lift the curse, but to no avail - and when the inevitable occurs and Aurora becomes sleeping beauty, the quest to find her "true love's kiss" begins.

MALEFICENT was directed by Robert Stromberg, a production designer on ALICE IN WONDERLAND and OZ THE GREAT AND POWERFUL. It's heartening to see that this film is much better than those two eyesores, if only by virtue of a moodier atmosphere and less inane clutter. That's not to say MALEFICENT isn't crowded with CG every step of the way - each frame is filled to the brim with digital plants, beasts, flakes, sunbeams, thorns, etc. It's almost as if Stromberg and his team couldn't bear it if there was one inch of negative space. However, it can't be denied that the film is quite often lovely to look at. Stromberg's years working on other people's greenscreens (he won an Oscar for AVATAR, a fact that is plainly obvious here) ably prepared him for his debut, and if what you're looking for is pure visual dazzle, you absolutely get it here. Dean Semler's cinematography is also captivating, and the 3D format is put to very good use. (These days I always judge a 3D movie by how much my eyes begin to bother me, and never did they once during MALEFICENT.)

But it's MALEFICENT's wavering tone that solidifies it more as visual treat than fully satisfying movie. Disney needs its sidekicks and comedy relief, so we get too many scenes where the three protective fairies bicker and make a mess of things, while the forest is inhabited by all manner of stuffed animal-ready creatures that simply look ridiculous and out of sorts with their surroundings. But you match those scenes against the ones where King Stefan, now a paranoid madman (played way over-the-top by Sharlto Copley), spits bile and vows death upon Maleficent, and the movie seems like it's being made by two different people. These darker sequences are more intriguing than the standard magical forest tropes, suggesting Disney had notions of fully diving into the grim possibilities inherent in the story. Alas, the gloomy sections sit uncomfortably beside the cutesy stuff.

Still, MALEFICENT has just enough going for it: Jolie is a magnetic presence, and Stromberg proves capable of providing stimulating sights. The finale gives us an apocalyptic showdown between Maleficent and Stefan (complete with a fire-breathing dragon, naturally) that is rousing and vivid enough to be considered too intense for the younger ones. And the runtime is a merciful 97 minutes, hence it moves along at an agreeable pace and doesn't overstay its welcome. It's just too bad it feels like its own wings have been clipped by a studio not willing to push the envelope just a little bit further.

Source: JoBlo.com

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

8:31AM on 06/05/2014

Go in with no pre conceived thoughts

Saw this today and was impressed, i found it quite touching and uplifting in parts. Angelina played the part beautifully, the first ten minutes or so showing Maleficents early years was nice and showing her reasons and subsequent regret of placing her curse. I'd easily give this a very solid 7/10.
Saw this today and was impressed, i found it quite touching and uplifting in parts. Angelina played the part beautifully, the first ten minutes or so showing Maleficents early years was nice and showing her reasons and subsequent regret of placing her curse. I'd easily give this a very solid 7/10.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+0
1:07PM on 05/30/2014
One of the reasons why I have no interest. No doubt, it will be a hit. But they keep doing these reimaginings of classics and they take out much of what we loved about the originals. It didn't work for Wonderland, it didn't work for Oz, and I knew it pretty much wouldn't work here. But of course, this will still do well, so they will continue to make these films.
One of the reasons why I have no interest. No doubt, it will be a hit. But they keep doing these reimaginings of classics and they take out much of what we loved about the originals. It didn't work for Wonderland, it didn't work for Oz, and I knew it pretty much wouldn't work here. But of course, this will still do well, so they will continue to make these films.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
12:59PM on 05/30/2014
This review hits it on the mark. I was thinking (and hoping) this would be a film about a very sinister Maleficent, especially since Disney says "she is the most iconic villain," but it's not. I found myself being disappointed as the movie went on and they were turning it into more of a soft film but as it ended I did enjoy the story and would still recommend it. It would have been great if they released this along with a PG-13 or R-rated version for adults where it shows Maleficent as the
This review hits it on the mark. I was thinking (and hoping) this would be a film about a very sinister Maleficent, especially since Disney says "she is the most iconic villain," but it's not. I found myself being disappointed as the movie went on and they were turning it into more of a soft film but as it ended I did enjoy the story and would still recommend it. It would have been great if they released this along with a PG-13 or R-rated version for adults where it shows Maleficent as the complete unsympathetic and wicked villain that we all thought she was.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+0
4:21AM on 05/30/2014

It's for little girls

A certain movie is made for a certain crowd. The bigger the audience the bigger the reward. I'm a male that loves dirty humor but I also enjoy a well made chick flick from time to time. I think this site was a little too harsh on Million Ways to Die in the West because I laughed (and so did the entire audience) throughout. As a mature male, did I enjoy Million Ways more than Maleficent?....Yes! But it's mainly because Maleficent is geared towards a younger female audience. I think an
A certain movie is made for a certain crowd. The bigger the audience the bigger the reward. I'm a male that loves dirty humor but I also enjoy a well made chick flick from time to time. I think this site was a little too harsh on Million Ways to Die in the West because I laughed (and so did the entire audience) throughout. As a mature male, did I enjoy Million Ways more than Maleficent?....Yes! But it's mainly because Maleficent is geared towards a younger female audience. I think an older (and male) viewer will enjoy Maleficent the first 20 minutes. It takes the right steps to set up the story and character development. But once it shifts into the main 'Sleepy Beauty' plot then that's where the movie goes down hill. The writing is very very lazy. I feel like the script is written in action form. "So this person does this and then this person does this"... with no real dialogue. After the princess is grown to 15 years of age, the writing gets worse. I found the king to be an idiot and I completely missed where the queen died. It seemed he didn't care about her one bit. The movie was so predictable and was way too safe for a younger audience. But I'm a grown male with no children. So of course I'm gonna choose Millions Ways over this.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
8:32PM on 05/29/2014
I loved it, and 8 out of 10. Angelina Jolie was perfect and Sam Riley just stole the show. I don't think Copley was over the top; I thought it was a very Shakesperean performance, King Lear-esque.
I loved it, and 8 out of 10. Angelina Jolie was perfect and Sam Riley just stole the show. I don't think Copley was over the top; I thought it was a very Shakesperean performance, King Lear-esque.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
4:44PM on 05/29/2014
Probably would have been better if they didn't throw Paul Dini's script out.
Probably would have been better if they didn't throw Paul Dini's script out.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
2:16PM on 05/29/2014

Off topic - Edge of tomorrow

went to see edge of tomorrow just now..it was great..on par with xmen i suppose
went to see edge of tomorrow just now..it was great..on par with xmen i suppose
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+0
1:31PM on 05/29/2014
I'll be seeing it this weekend. Not b/c I want to, but b/c I'm hoping it'll increase the chances of intercourse with my wife. she wants to see it.....
I'll be seeing it this weekend. Not b/c I want to, but b/c I'm hoping it'll increase the chances of intercourse with my wife. she wants to see it.....
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
2:18PM on 05/29/2014
Same boat. South Park put it best when they had a whole episode dedicated to manipulating the fairer sex into giving bjs by just bringing them to a show they want to see.
Same boat. South Park put it best when they had a whole episode dedicated to manipulating the fairer sex into giving bjs by just bringing them to a show they want to see.
1:20PM on 05/29/2014
Anyone getting tired of all these fairy tale prequels, reimaginings, etc ??? Because I sure am!
Anyone getting tired of all these fairy tale prequels, reimaginings, etc ??? Because I sure am!
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:03PM on 05/29/2014
Pretty much what I expected - either 6 or 7/10.
Pretty much what I expected - either 6 or 7/10.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
12:48PM on 05/29/2014
When one of the kindest things said in a review is essentially "It was over before long," I think I'll be staying far away.
When one of the kindest things said in a review is essentially "It was over before long," I think I'll be staying far away.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
12:46PM on 05/29/2014
Reading this, it felt like the critic viewed this film as worse than is because it failed to be what they wanted it to be before they watched it instead of what it actually was. I'll refrain my final verdict as to whether or not I agree until after I see the film for myself.
Reading this, it felt like the critic viewed this film as worse than is because it failed to be what they wanted it to be before they watched it instead of what it actually was. I'll refrain my final verdict as to whether or not I agree until after I see the film for myself.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
12:45PM on 05/29/2014
I expected nothing but mediocrity and got it. And good God, Angelina could open cans with those cheekbones.
I expected nothing but mediocrity and got it. And good God, Angelina could open cans with those cheekbones.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Movie News Headlines


Top
Loading...
JoBlo's T-Shirt Shoppe | support our site... Wear Our Gear!