 |
|
|
|
|
Viewing
1-10 of 28 User Comments
1
-
2
-
3
|
 |
 Vong
on Jul 25 2008, 1:10:33 AM writes:
Please stop making news stories a soap-box for your opinions on movies/actors...we don't care what you think about them, but we do care when it's brought up for no other apparent reason than to get people angry. |
| Profile | E-mail | WWW | Buddy |
|
 KcMsterpce
on Jul 24 2008, 10:12:53 PM writes:
DVD MAKES RATINGS KINDA POINTLESS ANYWAY
Every movie gets "Unrated" editions these days, so it's not as big a deal to have movies cut for theatrical release like 10 years ago when VHS was still dominant, and there weren't as many "Director's Cuts" or one of the 1000 other alternate versions easily available. |
| Profile | E-mail | WWW | Buddy |
|
nc_seventeen
on Jul 24 2008, 9:58:07 PM writes:
RYAN REYNOLDS CAN ACT
Did you even SEE The Nines? |
| Profile | E-mail | Buddy |
|
anomaly7
on Jul 24 2008, 9:08:24 PM writes:
Why is it okay for stores to sell "Unrated" DVD's, but movies in theaters have to be rated? All unrated really means is they haven't been submitted to the MPAA, so why can't a movie going to theaters do that? Either way, the system is bogus. |
| Profile | Buddy |
|
 thebrodyman
on Jul 24 2008, 7:27:51 PM writes:
LAME
Hey hey hey, I like Ryan Reynolds!
I think it is a bit ridiculous that this is getting an NC-17, when these dime-a-dozen horror movies can have graphic violence, nudity, and much more, and they gets R's. I mean you can even have mass violence in PG-13 movie now-a-days. I just think the MPAA as a whole is pretty bogus. |
| Profile | WWW | Buddy |
|
 Crazy Dud
on Jul 24 2008, 7:03:23 PM writes:
The MPAA, ever since I can remember, has always been much more strict when rating low budget and/or independent films, but much more lenient on big budget studio films that need a certain rating to make their money back.
Basically, if the MPAA applied the same standards to EVERY film, could not be bought, and if all theaters would show movies of any rating (other than porn), there would be far less reason to complain about the MPAA. |
| Profile | E-mail | WWW | Buddy |
|
 Jaybro7
on Jul 24 2008, 4:37:06 PM writes:
Thisis bullshit. Rambo had bodies torn in half, women getting raped, little boys getting abused, KIDS getting blown up with limbs, heads and intestines thrown about. But this is N7-17? I know its prob cuz Porno is in the title. Whatev |
| Profile | E-mail | Buddy |
|
 HoyleHaw
on Jul 24 2008, 4:19:12 PM writes:
I heard Grindhouse didn't have problems, which surprised the hell out of the filmmakers. Then again, maybe they pre-emptively cut the film.
Personally, I think since Smith is not stranger to the MPAA, and this thing is a comedy about porn, they oughta just keep the NC-17(or unrated) and make a huge viral campaign so people still turn out to see it.
And this coming from a guy living in the so-called Bible Belt. |
| Profile | Buddy |
|
 Frosty_86
on Jul 24 2008, 3:40:52 PM writes:
Kevin Smith should pull a Michael Bay and get Stephen Speilberg to use his awesome powers to protest the rating and get it changed to R without anything major changing. I swear I think they dont like Kevin and its probably the fact porno is in the title |
| Profile | Buddy |
|
 The Bodyguard
on Jul 24 2008, 3:29:50 PM writes:
If this remains NC-17, I won't be able to see it till DVD. No theater around here will touch it, Bible Belt and all and I am deep in it. |
| Profile | E-mail | WWW | Buddy |
|
|
Viewing
1-10 of 28 User Comments
1
-
2
-
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladies and gentlemen, the MPAA does it again. Kevin Smith's latest 
