The Wizard of Oz: the inevitable remake - in 3D, of course | Movie News

The Wizard of Oz: the inevitable remake - in 3D, of course
Comments: 32
terometer
31%
Strike Back below!
by: Dave Davis Mar. 9, 2010

Tim Burton's trippy triple-dimensional ALICE IN WONDERLAND snatched up over $200 million worldwide during its opening weekend, so studios are unsurprisingly looking for their own vivid mainstream 3D freakout.

Why not the mother of all nightmare-inducing "family" movies, THE WIZARD OF OZ? Yes, the LA Times says that Warner Bros. plans to force Dorothy back into the realm populated by frightened feline, heartless robot, brainless straw man, wicked witch, tuneful dwarfs, agitated trees, a giant disembodied shouting head, and an army of terrifying flying monkeys, oh god the monkeys.

The studio is reportedly eyeballing a couple of already-in-development projects to reshape and push forward, including OZ (from SHREK FOREVER AFTER co-writer Darren Lemke), and a darker variation from scribe Josh Olson (A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE) focusing on a granddaughter of Dorothy who returns to Oz to fight evil.

The source material, L. Frank Baum's book "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz", is in the public domain, but the original movie version is owned by MGM (which is apparently owned by WB).

The studio is reportedly still in the early phase on the OZ update, but have already put the word out to A-list directors.

Source: LA Times

Add to MFC Profile

Extra Tidbit: I think I'll just ease on down the road.

32 discussions Expand all
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
CrashOverride
12:06AM on 03/11/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
So let's sum it all up: Wizard of Oz, Return to Oz, and Tin Man. No, I'm not including The Wiz, but I also left out the Muppet's Wizard of Oz so bite me. Return to Oz with Fairuza Balk was an intensely terrifying continuation into the Oz legacy, and I think Tin Man complemented the two perfectly! Unless Samuel L. Jackson plays the Wizard, as is portrayed above... I have no interest.
So let's sum it all up: Wizard of Oz, Return to Oz, and Tin Man. No, I'm not including The Wiz, but I also left out the Muppet's Wizard of Oz so bite me. Return to Oz with Fairuza Balk was an intensely terrifying continuation into the Oz legacy, and I think Tin Man complemented the two perfectly! Unless Samuel L. Jackson plays the Wizard, as is portrayed above... I have no interest.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
CrashOverride
12:06AM on 03/11/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
So let's sum it all up: Wizard of Oz, Return to Oz, and Tin Man. No, I'm not including The Wiz, but I also left out the Muppet's Wizard of Oz so bite me. Return to Oz with Fairuza Balk was an intensely terrifying continuation into the Oz legacy, and I think Tin Man complemented the two perfectly! Unless Samuel L. Jackson plays the Wizard, as is portrayed above... I have no interest.
So let's sum it all up: Wizard of Oz, Return to Oz, and Tin Man. No, I'm not including The Wiz, but I also left out the Muppet's Wizard of Oz so bite me. Return to Oz with Fairuza Balk was an intensely terrifying continuation into the Oz legacy, and I think Tin Man complemented the two perfectly! Unless Samuel L. Jackson plays the Wizard, as is portrayed above... I have no interest.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
CrashOverride
11:59PM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
So let's sum it all up: Wizard of Oz, Return to Oz, and Tin Man. No, I'm not including The Wiz, but I also left out the Muppet's Wizard of Oz so bite me. Return to Oz with Fairuza Balk was an intensely terrifying continuation into the Oz legacy, and I think Tin Man complemented the two perfectly! Unless Samuel L. Jackson plays the Wizard, as is portrayed above... I have no interest.
So let's sum it all up: Wizard of Oz, Return to Oz, and Tin Man. No, I'm not including The Wiz, but I also left out the Muppet's Wizard of Oz so bite me. Return to Oz with Fairuza Balk was an intensely terrifying continuation into the Oz legacy, and I think Tin Man complemented the two perfectly! Unless Samuel L. Jackson plays the Wizard, as is portrayed above... I have no interest.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
skippy2057
4:00PM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Doing a remake of the '39 film is daft, but that's never stopped 'em before. I thought John Boorman was involved in a CGI version of Oz over of France? As far as I recall, it was supposed to be non-musical and more of a straight version of one of the books (I guess the '39 movie wandered quite a bit from the books).
Doing a remake of the '39 film is daft, but that's never stopped 'em before. I thought John Boorman was involved in a CGI version of Oz over of France? As far as I recall, it was supposed to be non-musical and more of a straight version of one of the books (I guess the '39 movie wandered quite a bit from the books).
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
korollocke
3:35PM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
if do something creepy along the lines of return to oz with the wheelers and tic toc I might go for it.
if do something creepy along the lines of return to oz with the wheelers and tic toc I might go for it.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
iheartnomnoms
1:17PM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
what was wrong with the first one?

if it's burton, i hope depp plays the wizard and not the scarecrow ...
what was wrong with the first one?

if it's burton, i hope depp plays the wizard and not the scarecrow ...
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
a1ant
12:59PM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
As long as they make this a "sequel" of sorts and continue the story from the original film (ala Alice in Wonderland) I can see this working.
As long as they make this a "sequel" of sorts and continue the story from the original film (ala Alice in Wonderland) I can see this working.
 
+2
Vote Up Vote Down
X-KID
11:19AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Burton's Oz?
I wouldn't be surprised if they already have Tim Burton in mind to direct and Johnny Depp to star...
I wouldn't be surprised if they already have Tim Burton in mind to direct and Johnny Depp to star...
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
Spacegojira
10:44AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
They should just make "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz". Something more true to the book. Not every fantasy needs a war scene Hollywood!
They should just make "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz". Something more true to the book. Not every fantasy needs a war scene Hollywood!
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
Bellatrix
9:40AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
UUUGGGGHHHH. Fuck.
UUUGGGGHHHH. Fuck.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
sebgecko
6:26AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Yes! I am so much into RnB, Hip-hop and now 3D!!!!!!!!!!

brrrrrr

[link]
Yes! I am so much into RnB, Hip-hop and now 3D!!!!!!!!!!

brrrrrr

[link]
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
critic_h8er
6:09AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
NO.



NO, NO, NO, NO, NO...



NO!!!!
NO.



NO, NO, NO, NO, NO...



NO!!!!
 
-1
Vote Up Vote Down
Heisenberg
5:54AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I want no one but Burton Directing this. His wacky vision has worked wonders for AIW, now let's see him do Oz. I also think it would be awesome to see Depp play 3 characters, The lion, the scarecrow and tin man. I hope to jesus that this happens. The original is a classic, but it's still just an adaption of a book. There shouldn't be anyone saying that no one else is allowed to adapt the book...
I want no one but Burton Directing this. His wacky vision has worked wonders for AIW, now let's see him do Oz. I also think it would be awesome to see Depp play 3 characters, The lion, the scarecrow and tin man. I hope to jesus that this happens. The original is a classic, but it's still just an adaption of a book. There shouldn't be anyone saying that no one else is allowed to adapt the book with their own vision.
 
+2
Vote Up Vote Down
Netforce
5:36AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
And I thought Tin Man series was supposed to be a remake. Hate the idea of remake but I love the picture in this article, haha.
And I thought Tin Man series was supposed to be a remake. Hate the idea of remake but I love the picture in this article, haha.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
brewsky99
3:59AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
what i have heard its been in development for years and its at the same stage as it was 2 years ago,its just a example of a paper trying to repackage a old story.
what i have heard its been in development for years and its at the same stage as it was 2 years ago,its just a example of a paper trying to repackage a old story.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
SuperMarcey
2:35AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Saw this coming, but instead of remake, how about they just go to the source material and do their own thing?
Saw this coming, but instead of remake, how about they just go to the source material and do their own thing?
 
+6
Vote Up Vote Down
scrotalache924
2:25AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
HELL F***ING NO!!!!
No, absolutely not. If they do this then I will never ever go see another Warner Bros. film again. Nope, not even another Batman movie, though it will pain me to do so. This is one step away from remaking Casablanca or Gone with the Wind. Stay away from the real classics, Warner Bros. NOW, if they do decide to make a somewhat original "sequel" or separate entity of the series, FINE, but DO....
No, absolutely not. If they do this then I will never ever go see another Warner Bros. film again. Nope, not even another Batman movie, though it will pain me to do so. This is one step away from remaking Casablanca or Gone with the Wind. Stay away from the real classics, Warner Bros. NOW, if they do decide to make a somewhat original "sequel" or separate entity of the series, FINE, but DO. NOT. REMAKE. THE ORIGINAL! What the hell happened to originality anyways?!
2 Replies
 
tomcom
1:49PM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
oh, yeah... forgot to say "nice avatar", scrotalache924
oh, yeah... forgot to say "nice avatar", scrotalache924
 
tomcom
1:48PM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Actually, I believed that the original was ALREADY one of the classic "untouchables" that would never be remade (I am a purist and definitely old-school). I'm pretty sure this is one of the signs of the Apocalypse.
Actually, I believed that the original was ALREADY one of the classic "untouchables" that would never be remade (I am a purist and definitely old-school). I'm pretty sure this is one of the signs of the Apocalypse.
 
+4
Vote Up Vote Down
Lucky Denver
2:02AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Anyone who didn't see a Wizard Of Oz remake coming needs a firm slap up side the head. I'm not excited but I'm not surprised.
Anyone who didn't see a Wizard Of Oz remake coming needs a firm slap up side the head. I'm not excited but I'm not surprised.
 
+7
Vote Up Vote Down
Brer B8a
1:35AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
This sounds retarded. Come up with some new shit Hollywood.
This sounds retarded. Come up with some new shit Hollywood.
 
+4
Vote Up Vote Down
morix
1:32AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
To WB: Produce a sequel (like Return to Oz) or a new story that takes place in Oz (like Tin Man) if you must, but don't remake the original!
To WB: Produce a sequel (like Return to Oz) or a new story that takes place in Oz (like Tin Man) if you must, but don't remake the original!
1 Reply
 
muveadict
11:04AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
'The studio is reportedly eyeballing a couple of [link] projects to reshape and push forward, including OZ (from SHREK FOREVER AFTER co-writer Darren Lemke), and a darker variation from scribe Josh Olson (A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE) focusing on a granddaughter of Dorothy who returns to Oz to fight evil.'
cited from the article you are commen...
'The studio is reportedly eyeballing a couple of [link] projects to reshape and push forward, including OZ (from SHREK FOREVER AFTER co-writer Darren Lemke), and a darker variation from scribe Josh Olson (A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE) focusing on a granddaughter of Dorothy who returns to Oz to fight evil.'
cited from the article you are commenting on.
 
-1
Vote Up Vote Down
Ocelot_Snake
1:27AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
They need to follow the book if they move forward with this
They need to follow the book if they move forward with this
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
track100
1:15AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I loved John Ritter in The Dreamer of Oz [link] He's one of the first things that pops in my head when someone mentions Oz. You should all check it out.
I loved John Ritter in The Dreamer of Oz [link] He's one of the first things that pops in my head when someone mentions Oz. You should all check it out.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
kabuto1138
12:52AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Fan Trailer
There is a trailer for this idea... sort of



[link]
There is a trailer for this idea... sort of



[link]
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
IQuitMrWhite
12:51AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Ok, but it's not a remake. I mean, if they go with this OZ idea, it's more of a sequel, or a [link] of a classic story. I don't see how this is any different than doing a new version of Robin Hood or Peter Pan...The Wizard of Oz is a classic film and deserves respect, absolutely. If this gets put in the right hands, who is to say this...
Ok, but it's not a remake. I mean, if they go with this OZ idea, it's more of a sequel, or a [link] of a classic story. I don't see how this is any different than doing a new version of Robin Hood or Peter Pan...The Wizard of Oz is a classic film and deserves respect, absolutely. If this gets put in the right hands, who is to say this won't be good? It has a chance...just like Tron: Legacy has a chance, or any other sequel/remake of a classic movie.
 
+2
Vote Up Vote Down
Zo!
12:34AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I don't care what anybody says but this is still the scariest movie of all time. Nightmare inducing is right
I don't care what anybody says but this is still the scariest movie of all time. Nightmare inducing is right
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
Dr.Frankenstein
12:25AM on 03/10/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
It was a no brain'er this would get remade at some point,of course in 3D is a given.
It was a no brain'er this would get remade at some point,of course in 3D is a given.
 
+7
Vote Up Vote Down
Terminal_83
11:51PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
I know what will happen. They'll remake the original 1939 movie. It will be very similar. People will just say it's another adaptation. It's going to happen, it happened with "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory."



Why not write something original?!



Focus on creating your own mythology. Something the studio can set the bar for and influence future generations. Get off...
I know what will happen. They'll remake the original 1939 movie. It will be very similar. People will just say it's another adaptation. It's going to happen, it happened with "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory."



Why not write something original?!



Focus on creating your own mythology. Something the studio can set the bar for and influence future generations. Get off the Oz train and try something new, for godsake.
 
+8
Vote Up Vote Down
The_Soloist
11:50PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
This is a really REALLY bad idea. The Wizard of Oz is a classic and in no way does it need to be remade. Let me guess, Tim Burton directs and Johnny Depp is The Scarecrow...
This is a really REALLY bad idea. The Wizard of Oz is a classic and in no way does it need to be remade. Let me guess, Tim Burton directs and Johnny Depp is The Scarecrow...
 
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
Derek237
11:46PM on 03/09/2010 Add as a friend | MFC profile
As long as it's not a direct remake I guess it'd be okay...it's not as if the wacky sequel with Fairuza Balk tarnished the legacy of the original. Bring it on!
As long as it's not a direct remake I guess it'd be okay...it's not as if the wacky sequel with Fairuza Balk tarnished the legacy of the original. Bring it on!