Warner Bros Discovery implements a fix for Max’s insulting “Creator” credits display

Max, creator credits,

Among several missteps since management exchanged hands at Warner Bros Discovery, botching the rollout of Max‘s “Creator” credits is one of the most egregious. Max, the recently-renamed streaming service from Warner Bros Discovery, quietly fixed an insulting design flaw in the platform’s credits generator, leaving many writers, directors, and producers out of their work. While Max now gives credit where it’s due, the reset will take another week to affect the platform entirely.

When Max launched in late May, the streamer listed every producer, writer, and creative position as a “Creator” on a television series or film. A typical flaw example points to Succession, created by Jesse Armstrong. Armstrong created the show, but according to Max’s ire-eliciting format, executive producers Will Ferrell and Adam McKay got listed in the same section of alphabetized names. The new design breaks contributions down to their core, including areas for Creators, Director(s), Writers, and Producers, Developed By, and, in specific cases, Based on Source Material.

The shotty design angered DGA and WGA members, who are fighting with studios for proper representation and compensation across the entertainment industry. While the Zaslav-run company attributes the format of the original credits to a glitch in the system, many saw the faulty presentation as a slap to the face.

“For almost 90 years, the Directors Guild has fought fiercely to protect the credit and recognition deserved by Directors for the work they create,” said DGA President Lesli Linka Glatter on May 24. Adding, “Warner Bros. Discovery’s unilateral move, without notice or consultation, to collapse directors, writers, producers, and others into a generic category of ‘creators’ in their new Max rollout while we are in negotiations with them is a grave insult to our members and our union.” Driving her point home, Glatter clarified that proper representation for contributions on any film-related project is necessary, and changes to the system are non-negotiable. “This devaluation of the individual contributions of artists is a disturbing trend and the DGA will not stand for it. We intend on taking the strongest possible actions, in solidarity with the WGA, to ensure every artist receives the individual credit they deserve.”

With its tail between its legs, Max responded to the outcry by saying, “We agree that the talent behind the content on Max deserve their work to be properly recognized. We will correct the credits, which were altered due to an oversight in the technical transition from HBO Max to Max and we apologize for this mistake.”

While the glitch excuse may be legit, some creators wonder why it took Max so long to initiate a fix. According to Max, they’re assigning more people to the correction of the oversight. “There’s literally 1000s of films, TV shows and specials that need to be fixed and reviewed,” a WBD insider explained to Deadline on Wednesday. “It just took time.”

Woof! Tempers are flaring in Hollywood, eh? Between this, the WGA strike, and a deadline to resolve issues closing in, making movies is getting more challenging by the day. Here’s hoping for progress in the coming days.

Source: Deadline

About the Author

News Editor / Columnist

Favorite Movies: Death to Smoochy, The Big Lebowski, Fear and Loathing in Las read more Vegas, The Crow, KPop Demon Hunters, The Sword in the Stone, Spirited Away, The Fisher King, The Shining, Planes, Trains, and Automobiles, The Burbs, The Babadook, Summer Wars, The Princess Bride, Mad Max: Fury Road, The Game, In the Mouth of Madness, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Monsters Inc., Amelie, The Crow, Fight Club, O Brother, Where Art Thou?

Likes: Getting lost in waves of sound while cocooned in a pair read more of serious headphones, comic book characters, film, and television, a delicious tumbler of whiskey, scientifically-inclined Canadians, wearing pajamas in public, pancakes, bacon, and long walks on the beach

The comment section exists to allow readers to discuss the article constructively and respectfully, focused on the topic at hand.

What’s Not Allowed

  • Abusive language, insults, or harassment toward other users or staff.
  • Hate speech of any kind is strictly prohibited.
  • Bickering, bullying, personal attacks, or baiting others to argue
  • Extended off-topic debates, especially those centered on politics or religion rather than the article topic
  • No AI content or SPAM