Poster Store  |  Join / Register  |  Log In  |  RSS Newsfeeds  |  Advertise  |  Newsletter  |  Contact Us
   

 News Schmews Etc!
 Worthington's Crime
 Up in the Air clips
 Brothers dream clip
 Review: New Moon
 Megan will live on
 The Hot Five!!
 Season of Witch...
 MOVIE POLL # 524
 Abrams' Salt and Gorn
 Jane Eyre gets cast
 Hoffman no Focker?
 Review: Bad Lieutenant
 Jason Segel's new song
 BTS of Wolfman!
 One more for Thor
 4th Underworld coming
 Gladiators gets writer
 Buddy Holly...
 Review: The Blind Side
 Review: Fantastic...
 DVD: March of the...
 Mel talks Mad Max 4
 DVD: Heat
 Spielberg Under Dome
 Samurai Jack update
 Ratner does Bollywood
 Bloodrayne 3, really?
 Conan Moon funny
 A Precious poster
 Remember Me trailer
 Pitt falls into Void
 Cast This: Cpt. Price
 Oscar docs list
 Most overpaid actors
 Orphanage loses...
 Amy's 10 Best Days
 Warhammer 40K movie
 Another Spidey rumor
 Cycler gets a movie
 Download with Freeman
 DVD: Rocky: The...
 DVD: Logan's Run
 Daybreakers PSA
 Eddie Murphy's next?
 Blood Simple remake...
 Weitz stops directing?
 Four for Ga'hoole
 Daybreakers poster 3
 New Olympians trailer
 MovieMaker promo
 Latest movie scripts!
 French Avatar poster
 Boll's Far Cry trailer
 Contest: Fight Club!
 Three Wolf Moon
 Up via Russ Meyer
 Miley's new trailer
 The Ten Spot 2/2 -...
 Jason Lee & Lennon

  Gabriella Lucia Hot-mi
  Ashley Greene hotness
  Fox spreads for NYT
  MichT Does Vicky's
  Swift is Leggy
  Hot for the Cook
  Hottie Clip #475
  ScreenCaps - Jessica...
  Wow WTF Meester?
  Katy in Red
  I See Her Danes!
  AshG Loves Burton
  Give Me, Kate!
  Battle of the Babes #79
  Emmy Gets Gapped
  Paquin Marries
  Fox's SNL Shoot
  Carmen Sex Tape?

  IFC Goes Netflix
  News: Capitalism: A...
  News: Cliffhanger (BD)
  EXCL: Angels/Demons...
  DVD: March of the...
  DVD: Heat
  DVD: Pandemic
  Who's Renting What?
  News: The Burning Plain
  DVD: Dark Country
  DVD: Rocky: The...
  DVD: Logan's Run
  Update: Cloudy with...
  News: The Keeper
  Update: Pandorum
  Awfully Good #101
  DVD: Dead Air
  DVD: Thirst

  More Paranormal...
  Lost Boys 3 Hottie
  Jason, 'Busters &...
  Couple Cool Vids
  Kill of the Day #279
  Avatar runtime revealed
  Descent 2 U.K. TV spot
  3 cool new Road clips
  My Ex plot/trailer
  New Moon breaks record
  Sign ROTLD book...
  New Season/Witch...
  Panic Attack short!
  Worthington's Crime
  Your 69 cents: New Moon
  Asylum rips Paranormal
  Review: Law Abiding...
  The Factory update

Paranormal similarity? Oct. 22, 2009
Comments: 23
88%
\"\"
Source: JoBlo

The low-cost spooker PARANORMAL ACTIVITY has proven to be quite a phenomenon. And while I haven't had a chance to see it yet myself, I couldn't help but notice it seems to bear some resemblance to a movie I did see several years ago -- another little household horror indie called IN MEMORIUM.

Made in 2005 by filmmaker Amanda Gusack (who went on to MGM's recent DVD thriller THE BETRAYED, starring Melissa George and Oded Fehr), IN MEMORIUM also took the DIY approach to the premise of capturing the domestic supernatural on camera.

Although its similarities to IN MEMORIUM are probably just a casualty of the collective unconscious, PARANOMAL ACTIVITY had the fortune of finding a considerable audience, while Gusack's film made the festival rounds but remains without distribution. Perhaps that will change in the wake of PA's success, since there's clearly a market for it.

I reviewed the movie for another online outlet a few years back, and I've reposted it below. You can also check out the IN MEMORIUM trailer down there, see some clips over at B-D, and learn more about the film at the official site.

When aspiring filmmaker Dennis (Erik McDowell) is diagnosed with terminal cancer, he decides to leave his legacy in filmed format. Along with girlfriend Lily (Johanna Watts), he rents a small house and wires it with microphones and motion-activated cameras to keep a grim record of his final weeks as he withers away. But the footage isn't exactly what Dennis had hoped for as an unwanted tenant from the afterlife has decided to make a guest appearance in his documentary, causing his illness to accelerate and making his remaining days a literal nightmare.

The faux-documentary approach has become a customary method of circumventing budgetary issues for independent, low-tech filmmakers, but it's not often nearly as effective as writer-director Amanda Gusack's morbid and creepy horror film IN MEMORIUM. Gusack's actors do a convincing job of being utterly terrified by the proceedings, and perhaps more importantly, they feel like an organic couple who would subject themselves to such a morose notion as filming one's eventual demise (Watts' fondness for wearing baby-Ts around the home certainly doesn't hinder the film's watchability).

There's no musical score, only the ambient sounds of creaks and chilling groans, while the unwelcome spirit is only glimpsed through shadows and freaky static-filled video, all with rather unnerving success -- I started watching the movie at 10pm one night and truly regretted it after the lights were turned off. For many horror fans, that's as sincere an endorsement as you'll find.

Latest Comments

23 Discussions (Expand All) | Show: Oldest First | Newest First | Most Popular

+0
Vote Up Vote Down
 
korollocke
5:07PM on 10/24/2009
One of the makers of blair witch was an usher in the theater where last broadcast was shown.
One of the makers of blair witch was an usher in the theater where last broadcast was shown.
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
 
1013 Briar Lane
quatermass
3:00PM on 10/24/2009
Then there's this:

[link]
Then there's this:

[link]
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
 
Obmulap
11:56AM on 10/23/2009
Sorry about that double post, remember kids don't refresh your page once you post....and now you know.
Sorry about that double post, remember kids don't refresh your page once you post....and now you know.
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
 
Obmulap
11:55AM on 10/23/2009
Unfortunately if it does get released now it will only be compared to Paranormal even though it was obviously done first.
Unfortunately if it does get released now it will only be compared to Paranormal even though it was obviously done first.
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
 
Obmulap
11:35AM on 10/23/2009
Unfortunately if it does get released now it will only be compared to Paranormal even though it was obviously done first.
Unfortunately if it does get released now it will only be compared to Paranormal even though it was obviously done first.
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
 
The Last Broadcast
Chenjoe6172
11:25AM on 10/23/2009
Blairwitch got in a bit of trouble back in the day for being a little too similar in premise. I actually like it better than BW. Except the ending.
Blairwitch got in a bit of trouble back in the day for being a little too similar in premise. I actually like it better than BW. Except the ending.
-1
Vote Up Vote Down
 
similarity?
Fancyclaps
10:38AM on 10/23/2009
this movie looks EXACTLY the same as PA.
this movie looks EXACTLY the same as PA.
-4
Vote Up Vote Down
 
JimmmyChopblock
9:32AM on 10/23/2009
Just because something is marketed as a "phenomenon" by viral marketing douchebags, doesn't actually make it a phenomenon.

Personally I don't know anyone who would pay to see some shitty movie that the ...
Just because something is marketed as a "phenomenon" by viral marketing douchebags, doesn't actually make it a phenomenon.

Personally I don't know anyone who would pay to see some shitty movie that the trailers are either A) too embarassed to actually show any fucking footage from the film or B) apparently advertising a movie about a guy who flys for .8 seconds and idiot kids in a theater jump up and down and make noise all to a bad night vision filter.

Stop telling me about how much I somehow "demanded it" and actually show me a real trailer about the movie so that I can decide whether I want to spend money on it or not. Don't just try to guilt me with some shit ass viral marketing campaign into feeling like "omg i have to see this cuz everyone else iz!"
Show Full Comment
7 Replies
Expand
 
 
MrPink077
1:55AM on 10/27/2009
Don't feed the troll...
 
 
GreySkull
1:55PM on 10/23/2009
You're alright Davis... you're alright...

lol
 
 
Dave Davis
1:38PM on 10/23/2009
Haha - what would even be the point of arguing? It's abundantly clear that A) the movie, its marketing and its success have personally offended you somehow, and B) you know more about everything than myself or anyone else.
 
 
JimmmyChopblock
12:48PM on 10/23/2009
It's actually kind of hilarious that you would claim that my "beliefs" don't "align with reality", when it can all be proven by a simple fact check.

Or do they just not believe in fact checking anymore on Joblo? Is hype-mongering and rumor-milling the new big thing for you guys?
 
 
Dave Davis
12:27PM on 10/23/2009
Then I'd say you're going to believe what you want regardless of whether it aligns with reality.
 
 
JimmmyChopblock
11:44AM on 10/23/2009
It only started out on a handful of screens because that was the marketing plan. This movie always had the backing to be in every theater from the beginning and it was always planned to be in every theater whether "you demanded it" or not. No matter what happened they would have ran those "you demanded it" ads to make people think there really was a huge drive for this piece of crap.

It's not a phenomenon, period. In fact, barely anyone has actually bothered seeing it - mostly due to issues I've already mentioned (insultingly obvious crowd manipulation, no real trailers, etc). You can put any piece of garbage in the theater and as long as enough people know it's there you're probably going to make around 30 mil - this is nothing special.

It's just hype-turds who want to feel like they're part of something trying to jump up and down about a garbage fest that the trailers are too scared to show us some actual god damned film footage of the fucking movie they're advertising for.

The only "phenomenon" that can be used to describe PA is a common one - herd mentality.
 
 
Dave Davis
11:31AM on 10/23/2009
The fact that PA started on just a handful of screens and has since made around $35 million is what makes it a phenomenon. Whether the movie or the marketing personally interests you is irrelevant to that status.
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
 
dellamorte dellamore
2:54AM on 10/23/2009
I didn't have a problem with the look of PA, you can get an HD camera for 400 or so now, they are becoming commonplace. It worked well for what the director was trying to do.

The footage in Mem is supp...
I didn't have a problem with the look of PA, you can get an HD camera for 400 or so now, they are becoming commonplace. It worked well for what the director was trying to do.

The footage in Mem is supposed to be of the lower end surveillance camera variety, which is fine for this idea, it should chill on a different level than PA.

I'm looking forward to it, the small number of people that had the chance to see it seem to all agree it's scary.

I'm expecting someone to pick it up for distribution very soon.
Show Full Comment
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
 
JohnLocke2342
1:56AM on 10/23/2009
Donnie Darko has a point... if the character spent as much as he claims he spent on the camera he used in PA then it better look clear.
Donnie Darko has a point... if the character spent as much as he claims he spent on the camera he used in PA then it better look clear.
-1
Vote Up Vote Down
 
Similarity?
Donnie_Darko
1:30AM on 10/23/2009
Yea, I'll give you that. But unlike some of the complaining about PA being HD (which is should be, it's not 20 year old footage... even I have and HD camera), this looks WAY too edited, if it's supposed to be a "found...
Yea, I'll give you that. But unlike some of the complaining about PA being HD (which is should be, it's not 20 year old footage... even I have and HD camera), this looks WAY too edited, if it's supposed to be a "found footage" kind of thing... is it? I could read the synopsis, but I dunwanna. I'd still watch it tho.

Oh, and PA was awesome... especially for free. :)
Show Full Comment
+1
Vote Up Vote Down
 
Looks pretty good.
Avian005
12:16AM on 10/23/2009
I find the gritty look much more realistic than the Hi-Def in PA.
I find the gritty look much more realistic than the Hi-Def in PA.
-1
Vote Up Vote Down
 
Much Better!
MarcoG
11:31PM on 10/22/2009
From just a few clips of footage from this trailer, it looks 10x better than whatever the hell was (or wasn't) in PA. The fact that this actually looks like cheap, real footage is what sells the film. The polished, Hi...
From just a few clips of footage from this trailer, it looks 10x better than whatever the hell was (or wasn't) in PA. The fact that this actually looks like cheap, real footage is what sells the film. The polished, Hi-Def look of PA takes whatever "reality" the film is trying to portray right out of it. Everything looks too "hollywood" for something that's supposed to look all amature. I wanna see this!
Show Full Comment
-1
Vote Up Vote Down
 
I like the concept
rriddle
9:52PM on 10/22/2009
however, it does look extremely amateur where as paranormal activity was a little more polished. Wouldn't mind seeing this one, though.
however, it does look extremely amateur where as paranormal activity was a little more polished. Wouldn't mind seeing this one, though.
-2
Vote Up Vote Down
 
i already
LoCkEd_N_LoAdEd
7:44PM on 10/22/2009
saw PA twice and it still gets to me. in memorium looks fake but creepy too.
saw PA twice and it still gets to me. in memorium looks fake but creepy too.
+4
Vote Up Vote Down
 
AS FOR PARANORMAL ACTIVITY ...
Dark Knight
7:30PM on 10/22/2009
...it's only good when you watch it first time. Second viewing shows serious lack of decent plot and bad characterisation. But first time, it's a hell of a scare.
...it's only good when you watch it first time. Second viewing shows serious lack of decent plot and bad characterisation. But first time, it's a hell of a scare.
Viewing page 1 of 2 back more









Daily Quote Archives | Box-Office | Movie Games | Stanley Kubrick Tribute | Chat Room | JoBlo Comic Strip | Contests | Links
Advertise on this Site | JoBlo in the Media | JoBlo.com Newsletter | Site Credits | Privacy Policy | Contact Us

© 1998 - present JoBlo Media Inc., All Rights Reserved Hello | JoBlo is a trademark of JoBlo Media Inc.
All movie titles, pictures, etc... are registered trademarks and/or copyrights of their respective holders

Hosting provided by the good folks at Nexcess.net
  Site Design by Face3media